Thursday
June 14, 2001
Utterly oppose boycott
Dear Mr. Ahmadi,
I have yet to read a more articulate and complete consideration of all
the arguments for and against voting ["Rethink
and rebuild"]. Though I may not agree with all the points you
make, I very much respect your point of view and agree with your ultimate
conclusion that the citizens of Iran -those whose future is in Iran- absolutely
should vote. I absolutely and utterly disagree with anyone who calls for
a vote boycott.
The history of the world is littered with the dashed aspirations of peoples
who chose to stay on the sidelines, thinking that their abstinence from
engagement would actually change anything/delegitimize anything/say anything.
But absence of a vote is only a silence. And as such, I have nothing but
respect for those Iranians who chose to vote last week.
That said, I did not vote in the most recent elections, though I could
have. The reason: it has nothing to do with the specific content of Mr.
Khatami's program, or the nature of the Islamic Republic. Further, I do
have a valid Iranian passport and updated shenasnameh, enabling me to vote.
The reason I chose not to vote is my aversion towards long-distance nationalism:
I live outside Iran and -- even more importantly -- will continue to do
so for the rest of my life.
I will not suffer the consequences of my vote. When I vote, I vote for
how millions of others on the other side of the world live, affecting my
life only marginally. It seems to me unethical to have the choice to dictate
a particular political result, when I am immune from the short-comings or
benefits of that choice. That is why I didn't vote.
And let me tell you, I really wanted to. I really really really wanted
to vote, if for no other reason, so that I could stick my tongue out at
all the monrachists/mojahedeen/various other authoritarian groups who were
boycotting the vote. But my particular silence had everything to do with
how I believe politics should be conducted.
I have looked at how a Croat nationalist pizza baron -living in the safety
and oppulence of his new Canadian home- funded the arming of Croat separatist
in Bosnia triggering a war which will not affect his life, his property,
or his family at all. I have seen how funding by Hindu nationalists in
the US allowed the destruction of Babri Mosque in India, resulting in bloodshed
between the sectarian groups, while those who funded the destruction had
nothing to worry about in the comfort of their American homes.
I have seen how American citizens in their safe cocoons of New York and
Los Angeles have funded and supported the construction of settlements for
fanatical Zionists in the West Bank and Gaza, creating havoc, death, and
destruction, which does not affect their lives in the least. I don't say
that my voting for a particular regime in Iran has anything in common with
the war in Balkans, sectarian violence in India, or neo-colonialism in Palestine/Israel,
but nonetheless, it is a vote I cast, a choice I make, not for my society
(as I now live in Europe) but for others' society. I understand and respect
the wish of those who chose to vote outside Iran, even if they will never
return to Iran. Participation in the affairs of your country of origin,
beyond all my political drivel, seems to be a visceral need for all those
living in exile.
The choice I made was my own, made on the basis of *my* political philosophy
and *my* very own standard of ethics. As such, I have no regrets about
the choice I made. The choice of non-interference.
All the best,
Laleh Khalili
|
|
|