Letters

September 2005
September 28

Top


And we are proud of this?

On Iranian women footballers "Fahimeh & Marzieh can play":

So we should be proud of this? Should we really be proud that Iranian female football players are dressed so ridiculously??

Funny, their opponents are Muslim women as well, but you don't see them dressed like bugs. 

Apparently in Iran women are viewed only as sexual objects that's all and even a sweaty and smelly player while playing on football field (empty one I may add) can still turn men on.

How sad, how really sad!!

A.K. Mehrassa

Top


Insulting women's dignity

On Iranian women footballers "Fahimeh & Marzieh can play":

It's a good to hear that the "second gender" is allowed to participate in athletic activities such as football, horse riding, etc under theocratic rule. 

The system still remains insultive to the dignity of women by asking them to cover themselves all the way so no male becomes aroused by them. 

Do the males in this sosiety lack control over their primitive desires and impulses? Or is it the rulers of such system who are still in a primitive stage of their devleopment, like our primate ancestors!

Hataw Sarkawt

Top


He's British!

On Sivand Dam and the debate over damage to archaeological remains in Fars:

How funny it is, since it was only last week that my article about the Hoover Dam in Las Vegas was published "Come together". In that article, I explained the reasons as to why our culture (Farhang) is so much carved and affected by the turbulent waters of our geographical location in the Middle East. I went on to compare such with the role of the Colorado River in the formation of the Grand Canyon. As you know, It was during the depression that America built the Hoover Dam and no it was not named after President Hoover! But the result of this dam has been incredible and many good things have resulted from this structure.

On the other hand, I have been reading about the Sivand Dam that has raised tremendous amount of concern in the Iranian communities all around the world. It feels as if we should try to stop the erection of this structure, since the final result could threaten the existence of our past, history and identity as Persians. And how sad is that? Especially when we compare the intent of these two nations and the final results of these two dams.

One of The recent articles that caught my eyes was published two days after mine by a British archaeologist by the name of David Stronach ["Wish there was more time"]. As an Iranian, I strongly object to this article published by a British!

What Mr. Stronach doesn’t understand, is the fact, that he already has three strikes against him (for those of you who understand baseball), before he even steps up to the plate to render us his opinion! Please allow me to explain what I mean!

First, he is a foreigner! This is strictly a matter of Iranian internal affairs and the Iranians are the ones that must talk, exchange, view, and even fight their own battles in such cases, and in no shape or form, does it merit the intervention of other foreign nations or for that matter foreigners to express their ideas regarding these matters. Strike number 1!

Second, he is British! Given the state of closeness between Tehran and London, and the history of the British people in Iran and in the surrounding countries, one comes to question the British’s intentions, since she has only exhibited world dominations for centuries and her influential interventions to benefit from such participations has been proven in the past.

The hidden relationship between the Mullahs and the Monarchs is also well known and is not talked about publicly. When the joke in Iran is that, under every beard of a mullah, the words “made in England” is tattooed, it says a lot! Therefore, considering such a level of mistrust between the suffering Iranians, who by the way are in the millions, in which they oppose this regime is enough of a reason that a British citizen’s opinion is the last thing we need to hear from! And whatever Mr. Stronach viewpoint may have been, it should not have been published on this IRANIAN site. And As a matter of fact, now we have the element of suspicion to deal with this situation and we must question in more details as to the whys' and seek more answers!

Two motives may be at works here: one, he is innocent and merely is trying to voice his opinion and two, he is an agent of the British Government who is trying to agitate Iranians which brings us to the question of why? Why would the British Government want to agitate and muddy the waters pertaining to this dam? In either case, we as Iranians have the responsibility to study and dissect both scenarios and to arrive at the motivation reasons. It is only then, that we will be in a position to act accordingly with such information. Strike Number 2!

Third, even the British are not that stupid! They know that the current Islamic regime of Iran has only had one agenda that they have always maintained and still secretly do… that being to change Iran into an Arabic state and do away with everything that was of Persia or of a Persian ancestry! And building a damn dam that would threaten the only historical site in which represents our Persian ancestry is but an example of my point! Otherwise we would not be having such debates regarding Pasargard and persapolis. Strike number 3!

Even I referred to this point in my last week’s article:

“Persia once was an empire that ruled many lands. Her vast spread covered many of today’s nations. We are from a very rich civilization, culture and history. Our values have luckily been intact for many of our past generations and this generation is no different. As the only country attacked by the Arabs, and with a brutal force that governed over 700 years to change Iran, her culture, her language and her people. They failed and we stand tall and unaltered! Even Egypt fell to such persuasion and lost everything of their non-Arab heritage. That makes me feel proud of my nation. I hope it makes you as well.”

These three reasons alone are adequate for us Iranians to object to this article by Mr. Stronach and to really voice our disgust regarding anything that a citizen of a nation that is in support of all the atrocities done to us and to our people in Iran. This should be a huge concern for all Iranians and we should insist to analyze this matter regarding this dam more closely before it is put in operation and we must demand that the Islamic Republic of Iran to place everything on hold. Until an international group of experts and unbiased observers picked by the Iranians both inside and outside of Iran could be assembled to study these threats independently and free of the Iranian Government’s influences and to release their findings regarding this dam to the world.

Matt Bina

Top


You put lives at risk

On call for "Guerilla street theatre in Tehran"

"I am sure that this is not against THE LAW... as far as having any precedence or legal code against costuming... what is interesting is that one's gender becomes unidentifiable."

When was the last time you went to Iran? How much do you know of the "LAW" in Iran?

The Iranian moral police or revolutionary guards DO NOT carry any law abiding standards. They are paid agents to beat up on any sort of protestors of any kind--they would like your ideological acts blasphemy against the regime. They are brutal but not STUPID!

By inviting kids to do this sort of act, which I doubt anyone would volunteer unless they are on drugs, you put their lives at risk.

Have you not heard of Ms. Kazemi's horrible fate?

K Sheila


Self-sufficiency trick

On Iran's nuclear policy:

The Iranian government's main excuse for pursuing Nuclear enrichment cycle is what they call "Khodkafaei" or self sufficiency or independence from the world (read west) for nuclear fuel.

While the nuclear reactors, equipment, spare parts, software, training, etc are all dependent on the other countries, talking about Khodkafaei is moot. In the 21st century no country is independent. Even US is dependent on other countries for many things including oil.

Also as it turns out the total known and unknown estimate of the Uranium that exists in Iran's mines is only sufficient to run the 7 planned reactors (like Bushehr) for a maximum of 10 years. What would Iran do after that? If the west decides to impose sanction on Iran, tons of enriched Uranium won't help a bit. There won't even be any spare parts for the reactors.

Iranian goverment says they don't trust the west and rejected European's offer for 30 years of supply of enriched Uranium, but they expect the west to trust the words of the Iranian leader, who says (Fatwa) that the Nuclear bombs are forbidden (Haram) in Islam.

Ayatollahs are known for changing their Fatwa every now and then, so who is more trustable, an Ayatollah who claims is elected by god to lead the muslims against the west and could change his Fatwa any time, or a group of Eurpean countries which have shown always obide by their international obligations?

S. Davari

Top


Sivand dam will cause damage

On Touraj Daryaee and Kamyar Abdi's "Safe & sound" and Touraj Daryaee's "Drowning in noise":

I understand as an Iranian academic and professor of ancient history your interest is in traveling back and forward to Iran, and you accuse others who have raised alarms about the consequences of the Sivand dam as having a political agenda, does this also include the UK based Guardian newspaper? Do you think the Guardian newspaper has a political agenda?

Also can you please explain why Mr. Mar'ashi did not deny the damage which the Sivand dam will cause to our national heritage but simply said "civilisations have to build on top of previous ones"?

Kind Regards,
Potkin Azarmehr
//azarmehr.blogspot.com

Top


Next time, try common sense

On Afshin Molavi's book excerpts "Seeing the future in their eyes" and "Revolutionary illusions":

This is in regards to the excerpt from The Soul of Iran: A Nation's Journey to Freedom. It's still so surprising to me when I read about people like Mr. M, who was supposed to be so educated, fervently support a revolution and not have any clue about the mullah's intentions.

People like him, the 60's/70's generation, are exactly the type of naive filth that are responsible for today's Iran. Did they honestly see Khomeini as a saint? Did people like Mr. M honestly think mullahs were going to step aside so the 'educated' class could simply start running the show? This is, to me, the definition of naivety and stupidity.

I was about ten in 1979, and even I knew it was going to be an Islamic state. I can only now think that their hatred for the US and the Shah severely impaired their vision and thought. So much for their 'education'.

And then you have morons like Mirdamadi, the 'hostage taker'. Millions like him stepped in during the early 70's and became the ones who determined Iran's direction with the creation of the revolution and the murderers and hooligans that were attached to it. And all these Iranians are building Iran.

Wow, so impressive. What they actually built is the government and society they now despise. Hardliners and former hostage takers are now against the mullahs. Students are all pro-west. Hmmmm, didn't see any of that coming.

A quote from the 'educated' Mr. M: "...and I cry every time I visit Dubai or Turkey, and see their success and compare it to ours." Mr. M, you only have yourself to blame for that. The next time you decide to support murdering buffoons and 'nationalists' like Khomeini, try some common sense.

Soheil

Top


Fuckbrain war-commemoraters

On Pouya Alimagham's book excerpts "We remember":

I just read the latest Neo-Hezi propaganda regarding the Iraq war that the president of the "Iranian Student Alliance in America" has spun together to commemorate the "start" of the bloody 8 year war with Iraq, which would have been a weekend exercise for His Majesties Armed Forces if the likes of Talabe Alimagham's elders and betters had not decided to summary-execute the top brass and chase the rest into exile.

I must say firstly, that I am Iranian, in America, and a student... and I never voted for this dim-wit: either his title is inflated like his ego and the propaganda-machine of the terrorist sultanate he supports, or that is a blatantly inappropriate name to pick for his little Neo-Hezi circle-jerk he's got organized there in northern California Now the Neo-Hezi propaganda machine wants to milk this 8 year disaster for all its worth: in two hundred years, goes the centrifuged spin, it is the fi! rst time Iran didn't lose an inch... (Why is it with these people, that it is always about "inches"?)

How about the hundreds of thousands of innocent people that you, fuckbrain war-commemoraters, justify putting to death because your supreme monkey wouldn't just call for truce after all Iranian territory was gotten back half-way through the war? EXACTLY because of the same bullcrap that aghaye ra'is Alimagham regurgitates: wanting to go to mother-fucking Karballa.

That is aggression, my dear juje Hezbollahi; Karballa is without question in Iraq and outside the jurisdiction of your so-called holy-defense (of your sultanate, and the fuckheads who have occupied it.) And how about the other slogan you left out.. how about "through Karballa to Jerusalem"... That is the line of thought that just might wipe Iran off the face of the earth, you dumb-fuck. You know I've heard they have pills that get you "inches" nowadays... look into! it, Mr. president.

Amir Irani-Tehrani

Top


Clever or disturbed

On articles by Hamid Karimianpour:

I read your "'Til time do us part" and the pursuing "Model of love" articles and would like to, calmly, make a couple of statements. I say calmly, because in your clever mind, you may appeal to these statements as reflection of rage and excess emotion to prove your point. I'm not going to give you that satisfaction.

1) I don't know where you are writing from or which version of English you're writing in: There is "formalized" as well as "jeopardised". If it's a typo, then so be it. Ineptness in no crime. If it is otherwise, then:

2) You are either a very easy to read clever, or an emotionally disturbed, person. Or you have an agenda. If you're the first two, then vaat-de-faak. If you are the last, then:

3) People like you are the reason that censorship should be legal, especially for the sand nigga eye-rainians like you. For y'all don't simply deserve freedom of expression. You may say that, that freedom is an integral right for a human being. To which I say, yes a human being, not the likes of you. Khodaa kamtar-etoon koneh! Begoo amen.

4) You are, however, very close to come out. If that's indeed what you're trying to do in the second article. In that case, if you're not ashamed of it yourself, just come out. See if anybody would give a flying &^%$

5) Had you held your first born --conceived from your own legal wife-- on the day of his/her birth, you would not have compared a marriage with a business deal. They are both deals, but not business deals. If you haven't: thanks heaven, you are another reason that abortion should also be legal. I hope you don't become any poor soul's father. Look up Sacrifice. Out-dated concept? Maybe. Honorable? No doubt. Not for you? Then, say so. Express YOURSELF. Don't prescribe. I think you should move to Fayziyaa (Qom) Seminary, lotsa sex and no marriages there: your utopia.

At the end, knowing JJ and the way he has the Iranian.com set-up, I know he's not going to refrain from publishing excrement like that. But he should show some restraint when it comes to his devotion to freedom of expression (Nothing's Sacred, which I totally agree with, except his definition of nothing,) and just good old common sense. In all honesty, I don't know what I would do if I were JJ! Publish you or not! I probably would have published you. But then I'd expect replies like this too. Two (more) pieces of doodoo does not a mostaraah make.

Seyed Moussavi

Top


Prejudice free council

On articles Jahanshah Javid's "Heechee kam nadaaran"

One friend just sent me your article that you wrote in July.

My name is Cyrus. I will be 46 years old tomorrow. I am a Baha'i. I am married with 2 boys, a software engineer living in Melbourne, Florida. I am also proud to be an Iranian Baha'i. I came to US when I was 19.

I just cried and laughed while reading your article on the Baha'i Faith. Who are you? In my whole life I have never heard/read a non-Baha'i Iranian write about my religion like this. You're a great man! I hope one day I get to meet you. I live only 1 hour from Orlando, FL. If you ever travel to Orlando, please call me. I really like to meet a prejudic free Iranian man like you. You're a unique individual (endangered species).

In my community I am working hard with my non-Baha'i friends to create a prejudice free environment. We have formed an organization called "Brevard Multi-Cultural Unity Council". Please visit our website: www.BrevardMUC.org

If you have time, please visit my other 2 websites:

www.BahaisOfBrevard.org
www.RabbaniTrust.org

As you see I am trying very hard to put my belief into action.

May God bless you and your family more!

Sincerely,

Cyrus Motlagh-Mariamabadi

Top


>>> All past letters

© Copyright 1995-2013, Iranian LLC.   |    User Agreement and Privacy Policy   |    Rights and Permissions