It's official
PWC's reply to Guive Mirfendereski
February 8, 2001
The Iranian
In response to the editor's note in "Persian
Watch Dog", the public relations office of Persian
Watch Cat (PWC) has sent the following. It says I have refused to publish
its reply to Guive Mirfendereski's "Power
of one". However, the reply was
published in the letter's section. It was not published as a feature
because it is essentially an AP story. I guess this is the PWC's official
reply. So, here it is, again, this time as a feature. Also
see a personal letter from the PWC executive director -- Jahanshah
Javid
February 8, 2001 email:
To Editors of Iranian.com:
It is with great regret to witness your continuous refusal of publishing
the official response of PWC to "Power
of one" by your Mr. Guive Mirfendereski as a feature article.
Our above mentioned manuscript was submitted to you on February 3, 2001,
(see below) with our request for its prompt publication as a feature article
at the iranian.com.
However, on February 7, 2001, you wrote: "I have invited the PWC
to write a reply explaining why they believe Dr. Mirfendereski is wrong.
So far the PWC has refused."
It is with great sorrow to witness such announcements that are not consistent
with the truth. Once again, we request officially the publication of our
above mentioned response as a feature article in your iranian.com.
Any submission other than those from the PWC Public Relation (via the
email address "antidis@antidiscrimination.org")
is not authorized as an official response of this organization. Please
note that individuals, including members of the PWC or other organizations,
who write or submit manuscripts or letters to you in support of or against
the PWC shall do so at their own discretion.
We would appreciate if you do not associate unauthorized submissions
to the PWC. Similarly, individuals who may wish to take legal proceedings
shall do so at their own discretion. Please do not relate such intentions
or actions to the PWC.
We appreciate if you kindly adhere to the well-known ethical principles
of authorship and media advocacy. We hope that the iranian.com remains
a productive and unbiased media for over one million Iranian Americans.
PWC Public Relations
February 3, 2001 email:
As a response to Mr. Guive Mirfendereski's two recent articles ["Power
of one","Face
in the mirror"] and his many letters against Persian
Watch Cat (PWC) during the past several weeks and his defending Senator
Dianne Feinstein in his letters and articles, a historical piece of news
by Associated Press is presented for publication (see below).
This piece clearly indicates why Iranian Americans criticized Senator
Feinstein, who, until today, has refused to apologize for calling thousands
of Iranian students in the US "potential terrorists".
We hope that iranian.com remains a productive and unbiased media for
over one million Iranian Americans. Kindly consider this submission for
publication as your second main article of the day, as was the case with
Mr. Mirfendereski's previous articles in this regard.
PWC Public Relations
Iranian-Americans against Discriminatory Remark of Senator Feinstein
June 28, 1998, NEW YORK (AP) -- For the umpteenth time, Iran was under
fire in Congress. Sen. Dianne Feinstein was leading the calls on this occasion,
urging tighter background checks for students entering the United States
from Iran and other hostile countries.
Her concern: American universities could be training potential terrorists.
Feinstein's criticism of Iran was nothing new in Washington, but the response
she received was.
Soon after her February testimony, she was contacted by a group of Iranian-Americans
objecting to her comments. "We were severely insulted," said
Dr. Kamiar Kallaantar, a San Francisco physician who says there has never
been a terrorism case in the United States involving an Iranian student
or immigrant.
Large numbers of Iranians began coming to the United States during the
1979 Islamic Revolution that drove the shah from power. But with U.S.-Iranian
animosities seething _ Iranians held Americans hostage at the U.S.
Embassy in Tehran, Washington charged Iran supports terrorists, Iranian
leaders tarred the United States as the decadent "great Satan"-few
Iranians got involved in politics here.
Now, led by a savvy new generation and encouraged by the election of
a moderate president in Iran, Iranian-Americans are increasingly urging
the United States to make peace with their former homeland.
"To take political action is kind of a new frontier. I'm (just)
worried we're too late," said Shahriar Afshar, president of the Iranian
Trade Association, a group working to end U.S. sanctions on Iran.
In addition to lobbying members of Congress, Iranian-Americans are writing
newspaper columns and cooperating with other interest groups to pursue
their cause.
With about 1 million ethnic Iranians living in America, they are also
considering endorsing candidates. Iranian-American activists interviewed
for this story said they have no ties to any political faction in Iran.
But they clearly support Iranian President Mohammad Khatami's efforts
to improve ties with the United States, despite hard-line opposition in
his country. "It's a new era in Iran. Sure Khatami's got a difficult
time. Now we want to help him," Afshar said.
More than half the Iranians living in the United States are in California,
with large communities in New York and Texas, activists say. Most have
kept a low profile. Some were hindered by language or cultural barriers.
Others feared retribution over Iran's alleged ties to terrorism and
the hostage crisis. "Being an Iranian in the U.S. during the 1980s
was not an easy time," Afshar said. "We were from a country that
it was almost publicly acceptable to hate."
That appears to be changing with the generation of Iranian-Americans
who grew up in the United States.
"These children are very interested in rediscovering their roots.
They also have a sense on how things are done in the U.S. in a way their
parents did not," said Gary Sick, a presidential adviser during the
Iranian revolution and one of the Americans held hostage in Tehran.
Amir Zamaninia, a spokesman for Iran's U.N. mission, said his government
has no ties with Iranian-American groups. He declined comment on their
growing range of activities. Some U.S. corporations with interest in Iran
are joining the lobbying effort.
The San Diego-based Iranian Trade Association has attracted more than
20 corporate sponsors to its campaign against sanctions, said Afshar, a
30-year-old former worker in that city's trade office. Among his sponsors
is Conoco, which had a $1 billion oil-field project in Iran blocked by
the U.S. government in 1995.
Gary Marfin, Conoco's manager for government affairs, said the company's
alliance with Iranian-Americans is part of its general opposition to economic
sanctions. "About the only impact sanctions do have is lost business
and lost job opportunities in the U.S.," Marfin said.
Another group, Iranians for International Cooperation, seeks to promote
dialogue, cultural exchanges and economic ties between Iran and America.
Trita Parsi, a graduate student who leads the group from Sweden, said
opening Iran to the West will reduce tensions and ultimately help average
people in impoverished Iran. Noting that most exiles still have family
in Iran, he said ordinary Iranians want friendly ties with the West.
"Khatami has promised more personal freedom, the rule of law and
better relations with Iran's neighbors and the West. We agree with these
goals and want to do what we can to make their fulfillment possible,"
Parsi said.
Iranians for International Cooperation has also targeted perceived discrimination,
meeting recently with Feinstein's office after the senator's call for tighter
visa restrictions.
On the individual level, hundreds of Iranian-Americans have contacted
members of Congress since Khatami's election, said Rep. Robert Ney, R-Ohio,
who is a leading supporter of improving relations with Iran. "About
90 percent of these people ask us to please think about communication"
with Iran, he said.
