Letters
April 5-April 9, 1999 / Farrvardin 16-20, 1378
Today
* Prejudice:
- She has never told her family
* Kosovo:
- Damned if you do...
- At a loss
- Milosovic's bloody trail
* April Fools:
- I'm offended
- Get a laugh
Comedy Central
- Sense of humor
- A wonderful luxury
- Sorry for myself
Previous
* Music:
- That which we all are
* Kosovo:
- Peacekeeping?
- At a loss
- Milosovic's bloody trail
* 13 Bedar:
- Understandable
email us
Friday,
April 9, 1999
* She has never told her family
I am a handsome, well-educated, professional African-American male who
met and fell in love with a beautiful, well-educated, professional Iranian
woman. We love each other very much but she has never told her family about
me. They are constantly trying to fix her up with Iranian men for marriage.
She is always telling me how frustrating it is to not be able to tell
them that she has already met someone that she loves (me) and that she
isn't looking anymore.
We sometimes talk about a future together but she is really afraid of
what her father and family may think. I truely love this woman and hope
to marry her someday. Please write me back. I need to talk to someone.
Eternally hopeful
Go to top
* Damned if you do...
I just finished reading Mr. Tehrani's article on the Kosovo war situation
["Why
Kosovo?"]. As I recall, when the Bosnians were being driven
out of their homes or massacred by the Yugoslavian army, many of us Iranians
commented that the mere reason NATO or the United States in particular
is not intervening is the fact that the victims are Moslems. Now that
the West is actually performing a positive role, some of us have managed
to come up with absurd scenarios as to why the United States has begun
taking military action.
Why do we always have to be so suspicious about everything? This story
is very simple. Milosovic got away with murder twice. His intentions in
the region are very unclear. You don't know where he will attack next.
Better stop him now.
The massacre of the Kurds, Cambodians and Africans are all valid points
and must be dealt with separately. Let's not confuse the issue here.
Just because the West did not stop the killings in Rwanda, it does not
mean they should not stop the killings in Kosovo. Two wrongs don't make
a right. I guess you are damned if you do it, damned if you don't.
Ghassem Namazi
Go to top
* I'm offended
Sorry. I don't appreciate the humor of the Senator article ["Iran
is a great country"]. As an American, I'd love to see the lines
of communication between both Iranians and Americans open - as well as,
eventually, the lines between our two governments. I don't see the humor
in this sad situation.
And, frankly, I'm offended in the portrayal of Americans in it. These
stereotypes (dumb American) along with characterizations of Iranians (militant
terrorists) are exactly what we need to overcome in order to have this
dialogue. Let's, at least, begin with a worthy site such as yours but
not adding to these stereotypes.
Marla Zometsky
Go to top
* Get a laugh
I read the letters that some uptight readers wrote in response to your
April Fool's prank ["Iran
is a great country"]. These people have got to get a life and
chill out. Whoever even said that Iran wasn't a great country and the
Iranians weren't the cat's meow?! It's this obsessive sense of false pride
that will never allow the Iranian mind to grow out of it's emotional
huvel.
Get a grip folks. I read the very same piece about Diane Feinstein
and Barbara Boxer and laughed. I'm also Iranian though, I seem to have
a sense of humor that some of the whinning readers truly seem to lack.
Thanks for YOUR humor The Iranian! Here's wishing all you a relaxed
and FUN filled new year!
Banafsheh Zand
Go to top
Thursday
April 8, 1999
* That which we all are
Listening to the lyrics of ashkha
va labkhandha (Sound of Music in Persian) brought tears to my eyes.
The years gone by; the memories and people left behind. And that which
I am today; that which we all are today.
Behrad Fardi
Go to top
* Peacekeeping?
The author of "Why
Kosovo?" writes: "Instead of Anglo-American bombing of Iraq
or NATO attack on Yugoslavia, the world could have by now established a
credible United Nations peacekeeping force to intervene in cases of outright
state aggression or genocide. That course would have been far less costly
and far more legitimate and humane."
While the idea is quite honorable in theory, the author seems to have
lost sight of the practicalities of such an approach. What makes such a
"peacekeeping" force credible? The stamp of the U.N.? The Iraqi
fiasco does bear the U.N. stamp. One can argue about its legitimacy but
the war on Iraq and the ensuing military activity is under the auspices
of the U.N.
How exactly would a "peacekeeping" force gain access into
a sovereign country (i.e. Yugoslavia) without either the cooperation/permission
of that government or by force (outright ground war)? The former was an
option but did not work (Yugoslav government did not agree) and the latter
is still an option - albeit an expensive one in terms of human lives on
both sides. In addition, while the cause of defending the Kosovars is novel
and humanitarian, it may not be strong enough to get the public (read votes
and money) to support it. Then again, it is too early to tell. It is only
day 15 of the bombing.
In addition, who determines where the peacekeeping force should go?
As the author has mentioned why not Turkey (to protect the Kurds), or Afghanistan
(ostensibly to protect the women) or various locales in Africa? When is
it intrusion and meddling in the affairs of a country and when is it peacekeeping?
And most important of all who is going to provide the resources (equipment
and personnel and money) for such a force? What exists now, whether NATO
or U.N., is as close to such a force as possible. And of course, its legitimacy
is debatable.
Aref Erfani
Go to top
Wednesday
April 7, 1999
* At a loss
Dr. Tehranian's interpretation of the war against Yoguslavia was quite
interesting since he himself admitted that no one seems to have an answer
to the riddle of why NATO is there ["Why
Kosovo?"].
He shares with others a nascent sense of not understanding this conflict
within the framework of the traditional politco-social studies. Is it imperialism,
capitalist expansion, war-mongering or plain and simple humanitarianism?
He is not alone, everyone from my own mother who always blamed everything
on the whim that "there must be something in it for someone,"
to even best socialist magazines such as "The Nation" (www.thenation.com) are pretty much at a
loss as to how to interpret this within the leftist frame of thought.
May I offer this explanation which occured to me when I was buying a
travel guide recently. Maybe, just maybe, map publishers such Rand McNally
are paying Milosovic to do this in order for them to print a whole set
of new atlases and maps with yet another county added to the world. Other
than that, we just might have to aceept that the plight of hundreds of
thousands of Kosovo Albanians being driven out of burning villages is cause
enough for NATO to do this.
Ramin Tabib
Go to top
* Milosovic's bloody trail
I admit that I'm a simple man who doesn't see the many hidden political
forces that cloud Dr. Tehranian's view of NATO's campaign over Serbia ["Why Kosovo?"].
In contrast, what I doubt most is what Dr. Tehranian sees as most clearly:
"... that an opportunity for peaceful resolution of international
and inter-ethnic conflicts is tragically being lost." I thought that
the repeated visits of the U.S. Special Envoy to Yugoslavia and even the
visit of the Soviet prime minister were ample opportunities.
In looking at what is happening in Kosovo today, I can't help but remember
that President Molosovic is the same man that spearheaded the humanitarian
tragedy in Bosnia. In judging his actions, we have the luxury of knowing
that it is not his first time to "ethnically cleanse" an entire
city. In fact, his pattern of actions have traversed a long and bloody
trail.
As nearly half a million woman and children pour across the borders,
many without their sons and husbands, this is not the time to explore theoretical
possibilities for a U.N. that might send troops in places where there is
genocide. The fact is that such a U.N. body has never existed, and with
the weakening of Russia and rise of the United States, perhaps never will.
Reza Shadmehr
Go to top
Tuesday
April 6, 1999
* Understandable
In "15
Bedar" you wrote: "Year by year our Persian festivities will
become less and less Persian. But we'll always have each other." That
is understandable. It happened to the British, Irish, Orientals, Indians,
Africans, and now Iranians. This situation is also true for Iranians who
live in Europe or other places.
Kids grow up and understand Farsi but do not talk Farsi. They listen
to rap music instead of traditional Iranian music. Is this bad? I do not
know the answer. If you do not like it what can you do? Take the family
to Iran for at least one month a year. Dollar is 805 tomans now and you
can buy airline tickets for $770.
Loved the pictures. I wish I was there. It is a blessing to live in
a metropolitan with a large Iranian population.
Hosain Massiha
(exiled in Louisiana)
Go to top
* Comedy Central
The Iranian Times is a news organization, not Comedy Central.
I am of course referring to your April Fool's prank "Iran
is a great country". Also, what is interesting is the notion put
forward by at least one of your readers that irresponsible
journalism is somehow covered by the First Amendment (you know, freedom
of the press). Freedom of speech is a right guaranteed for those with opposing
points of view. Your credibility as a reliable source of news has in my
view suffered a lot.
Shahram Mostarshed
Go to top
* Sense of humor
Dear Ali Hashemi-Nejad
Every one tries to make a dollar at the expense of something or someone,
it is what makes the world go around. I believe that it will be a more
tolerant and peaceful world if we all had a sense of humor and did not
take ourselves so seriously ["Iran
is a great country"].
I respect your opinion, and do share some of your concerns, but I do
not find the solution standing on a higher intellectual plateau, throwing
insults at others, for in the realm of things, who is to judge one's superior
or inferior intellect?
Babak Yektafar
Go to top
Monday
April 5, 1999
* A wonderful luxury
I enjoyed your rather tasteless April Fool's joke - it did make me smile
but it was rather too close to the knuckle ["Iran
is a great country"]! I really had a good laugh though when I
read the letter by Ali Hashemi-Nejad. To claim cultural
and class superiority and yet to not be able to spell invites hilarity
- not sympathy.
Humor is a wonderful teaching tool - and the responses to your prank
have made me think about the incredible luxury of free speech. It is not
purely an American luxury - it is a luxury that people try and uphold everywhere
around the world. I hope The Iranian Times will make more of the
story about a court case in Iran reported in this week's Economist (March
27-April 2) entitled 'Stop that laughing, please.' The fortnightly magazine
Adineh was banned for carrying a story with the headline 'Is joy
lost in our city? Is laughing a sin?' The article told the story about
a family dining in a restaurant and openly enjoying themselves when they
were asked by a man if they were not ashamed that they were laughing. This
was obviously too much for the group called the Headquarters for Combating
Vice and Promoting Virtue - they went to court to close the magazine and
were successful.
As we wander around what Mr. Hashemi-Nejad calls our
'cultural wasteland' he and the rest of us can thank our lucky stars that
we are free to poke fun, to misspell 'inebriated' (even when we presumably
are not!) and to criticize our politicians when they are silly - without
the threat of losing our livelihoods. Mr.Hashemi-Nejad
should learn to lighten up or rethink the privileges he claims by living
here - of course should he choose to return to Iran I think we could all
heartily recommend him for a job at the Headquarters for Combating Vice
and Promoting Virtue!
Minou
Go to top
* Sorry for myself
What an awful joke ["Iran
is a great country"]. I'm really sorry for myself for being a
subscriber [to The Iranian Times]. You are running a media and these
kinds of jokes are not acceptable at all. Can we trust you anymore? Have
you ever heard the TV or radio stations in this country [U.S.] giving the
wrong information ... or just joking about it?
Katayoun Hashemi
Go to top
Copyright © Abadan Publishing Co. All Rights Reserved.
May not be duplicated or distributed in any form