May 3-7, 1999 / Ordibehesht 13-17, 1378
* The Iranian:
- This is who we are
- Credit card
- Seeking mother
- Khar mard-e rend
- You simply lie
- More, please
- Attempt to reconstruct reality
- Iranian-American men just as bad
- Weird Western girls
- Aftab-mahtab-nadeedeh wife?
- Hymen reconstruction
- Are you out of your mind?
* The Iranian:
- I disagree
- Why so blatantly biased?
May 7, 1999
* This is who we are
In response to your
letter (Babak Banaei)... Many people would agree that Islamic views
are not all that you should see in Iranian culture. As much influence
that Islam had in Iranian culture, I am surprised that you expect not too
see any influence exerted on our culture by living in the U.S. This is
who we are and the way we live here in the U.S. and this is reality.
"Iran" and being "Irani" are not some small static
definitions in a box. Culture is what we make of it. Culture is not a
predetermined entity ... FULL
Go to top
* Daylight robbery
Mr. Tehranian's story was really amazing ["Turkish
coffee is good. But not that good"]. I have also been cheated,
on a few occasions and in different cities including Istanbul. However,
I could never imagine that local charlatans could dare come up with frauds
of such large amounts.
This certainly means that the same guys or similar con artists in the
same city have done this in the past and have gotten away with it, while
so called reputable organizations like Merrill Lynch and International
Visa ignored them. So these con men keep doing it with confidence.
This is what we call daylight robbery. If Visa did not have such a vast
and obvious monopoly in the credit card business, many people, including
myself, would have returned the cards over this incident. I always enjoy
Mr. Tehranian's articles, but this time while it wasn't fun, it was very
Go to top
* Seeking mother
I commend Mr. Cyrus Rafaat's courage for his article on relationships
Iranian girls?"]. Most people are probably not willing to openly
show what asses they are. This author has made sweeping generalizations
about women in Iran and in the U.S.
There are all types of people, living in every kind of society. The
"ghaatipaati" women he referred to exist in the U.S. and they
also exist in Iran, and every other society in the world. Similarly, good,
upstanding women exist in all societies and cultures.
It sounds to me like Mr. Rafaat is seeking not a wife, but a mother,
and therefore cannot accept an Iranian-American woman who would be so different
than his mother, which he described as a Mid-Western American woman.
An Iranian-American woman would be dealing with a constant struggle
between two cultures, which is the same struggle Mr. Rafaat with his mixed
blood probably deals with everyday.
Moreover, he never told us of the outcome of his khastegaari in Iran.
I imagine that any woman in her right mind who accepts marriage to this
fellow is seeking an easy exit from Iran to the U.S., not knowing what
kind of life awaits her here.
Go to top
May 6, 1999
* Khar mard-e rend
In response to Mr.
Almassi's letter about "zerangi": The way you described zerang
was wrong. A zerang person is not a cheat, liar, or opportunist. A zerang
person knows what to do in every situation and has the ability to pull
his gilim out of the water! (How do you like that? Persian idiom for you!)
What you are referring to is not zerang, that is khar mard-e rend!
Go to top
* Iranian-American men just as bad
Mr. Cyrus Raafat, I have been thinking about the same issue for a while,
as if you read my mind ["Real
Iranian girls?"] . I am so unhappy about the quality of the people
I have met here. After 20 years, I have met form the most intellectual,
gorgeous face and body, to the richest. But yet not a match. You are right
, most of them are so mixed up! They have no morals, virtues, or goals
in life.They seem educated or that they come form a good family. But when
you get closer, they all seem so fake! They have no idea what they want
in life. Sexual relationships are so easy for them. No belief , political
or spiritual ideals.
I sometimes think marrying in Iran may be the alternative. At least,
everyone knows their roles! People are more respectful. Husband and wife
have sharm va haya between themselves. Maybe , it is not such a bad idea
after all. I just do not know how my parents would react to me marrying
an Iranian man who does not speak English and has never lived in the West!
I do not know how my friends would relate to this marriage. Or, maybe I
should go to Iran and marry one of the guys who came form the U.S. looking
for a wife. At least, he will not have to teach me English, driving, shopping,
pay for my education and explain a new culture. Hay, his new bride will
be so much more sophisticated than all of his other friends' brides imported
It was funny reading your criticism of Iranian girls in the U.S. I hear
the same things from my girlfriends about Iranian men living here! Few
years ago, my blood would be boiling over your stereotyping. In a few years,
you too would look at life differently.Relationships are hard work. Nothing
that comes easy is appreciated for long. So, just because an Iranian-American
girl does not bat her eyelashes at you all the time, does not hang on your
every word, or is careful about her marriage choices, it does not mean
she does not have much to offer.
And more importantly: What do you have to offer her? How interesting
are you? What are your political views? what do you believe in, spiritually?
What books are you reading these days? What do you think about the war
in Yugoslavia? Are you a good role model for children? What kind of values
and ethics do you have?
Although I have my issues with all three cultures, I value love and
partnership. I value my family and friends. I have learned to look at the
person -- not the package. So, stop chasing packages, and get to know the
person, whoever she/he is! It is hard work but like a good gardener the
harder you work, the prettier your roses!
Go to top
I congratulate you on your sincere affection towards Iran and Iranian
Iranian girls?"]. Nonetheless, just as you are praising Iranian
girls for their dignity and self-respect, you contradict yourself by comparing
them to touchable (or untouched!) objects, pieces of cake and lower species
created and put there to serve as your virgin brides! Are you sure that
you understand the meaning of dignity?
Go to top
May 5, 1999
* You simply lie
I read the interview with Mr Abdolkarim Soroush (previously Abdolkarim
Haji Jafar) about reconciling Islam and human rights ["Travelers
on one ship"]. Since the revolution everybody remembers him as
a bearded man giving lectures on history and philosophy, in a language
that was 80% Arabic, 20 % Farsi. I remember it was very difficult to follow
At that time he was the nightingale of the Islamic Republic. I remember
those days (enghelaab-e-farhangi and the closure of all universities in
Iran for four years). While we were struggling so hard to meet all the
demands of the shoraay-e-enghelaab farhangi -- which Dr. Soroush was one
of its eminent figures -- to reopen the universities, Dr. Soroush was giving
sophisticated lectures to the public on TV.
He remembers well when he received my message about his lectures. I
told him, "You are giving these lectures for AVAAM (ordinary Farsi-speaking
people) but your highness should be aware that we do not understand you
because these lectures are for the KHAVAAS (people who speak your lingo)."
Knowing Dr Soroush, he climbed the ladder of Borj-e-aaj, with the help
of the Islamic Republic. I cannot believe in his sincerity, when he talks
about democracy and human rights . Knowing Islamic fegh'h, everyone
knows that they are not compatible. The Islamic Republic from Khomeini's
time up to now has been very clear about that. They even went so far that
they changed vealyat-e-faghih, to velayat-e-mostabeddeh-e faghih.
My request is for him to elucidate his process of ESTEHALEH to the public,
not the way he used to give lectures nor the way he is writing nowadays,
which is reminiscent of the writing in KALILEH & DEMNEH and he is very
proud of it. Dr. Soroush, you are NAMAK KHOR & NAMAKDAN SHEKAN. YOU
ARE A PERMANENT MEMBER OF HEZB-E-BAAD. You are still pretending. You simply
Go to top
* More, please
The Iranian needs more pieces like this! ["Soroush interview:
on one ship"]
Go to top
* Weird Western girls
This is the best article I've read here! ["Real
Iranian girls?"] This guy is great! I am a successful 42-year-old
engineer in California who has not found Ms. Right. Look at this fascination
with these "siaahs"
for instance, what does that tell you? It might not be fair to say that
all girls in the West are weirdos, but it seems all the ones I meet, are.
There are girls in Iran who do bad. But I bet they are like 3% of the
population. Here in America maybe 3% are good; big difference!
I think if I get rich in the U.S. I will go back to my country and get
a good girl. For now it seems hard to find one and after 17 years in this
country this story has inspired me to go and check things out.
Go to top
* Aftab-mahtab-nadeedeh wife?
I read your proud proclamation of chauvinism with utter disbelief ["Real
Iranian girls?"]. How truly hypocritical to admit to having been
a playboy and expect an aftab-mahtab-nadeedeh wife! Do you not hold yourself
to the same moral standards that you expect of your future partner in life?
What on earth makes YOU a better husband than an Iranian man living in
Iran or any of the more enlightened Iranian men living in the West?
There is nothing inherently wrong with wanting to marry a woman who
was raised in Iran - there are undoubtedly a good number of intelligent,
virtuous young ladies living there. However, the same is true about the
women living in the west. Ultimately, there are people of all kinds everywhere.
If you have not had the opportunity to meet some of the more hard working,
bright and accomplished Iranian women living in the U.S. in your lifetime,
you should question your own character, social circle and life style!
To make sweeping generalizations about all Iranian women born or raised
in the West and to call them all immoral, unchaste and lazy is disrespectful
and does nothing to prove your point, if you have one at all.
It is your mentality and those of men like you that has made hymen reconstructive
surgery one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in Iran.
Yes, the virgin wife that you will be importing could have an intact hymen,
but nothing remotely virtuous about her. Of course, your hypocrisy deserves
Chaste in San Diego
Go to top
May 4, 1999
* Hymen reconstruction
Mr. Raafat's obsession with female virginity ["Real
Iranian girls?"] is not only irritatingly uncool and medieval,
but is also surprisingly naive for a self-proclaimed playboy.
Precisely because of customers like him, reconstructing hymen has become
a common occurrence and a profitable business for doctors in Iran.
Iranian genius, with help from Japanese technology, rebuilds this precious
part of the female anatomy better and stronger than God himself had intended.
While this keeps the likes of Mr. Raafat happy, it perpetuates hypocrisy
and harms Iranian youth's desire for an open and healthy society.
Go to top
* Are you out of your mind?
Cyrus Raafat mentioned ["Real
Iranian girls?"] that Iranian girls abroad are "ghaatipaati"
and in his opinion any self-respecting American girl is better than them.
But, aren't you ghaatipaati when you are seeking a decent, virtuous, virgin,
chaste, untouched bride and at the same time admit to being a playboy?
And of course congrats for meeting 23 girls during only 35 days in Iran.
All they had to do to impress you was talking to you in English and "really"
wanting to know you. I wonder if what you really need is just some attention,
which you haven't gotten from Iranian-American girls.
And do you really think that if virginity is not an issue for someone,
it means they do not care if their bride sleeps with someone else the night
before their wedding? Either you are very simple or just completely out
of your mind.
Go to top
* I disagree
In penning his May 3rd letter "Why
so blatantly biased", Mr. Banaei illustrates that he has bought
into the Western notion of bias versus subjectivity, while he criticizes
the very paradigm his analysis is based on. What he is in essence objecting
to, is the fact that his viewpoint is not being addressed.
To adopt a different style, I disagree with Mr. Banaei for the following
reasons: Banaei levels accusations and offers critiques of Iranian writers
while failing to acknowledge that in general viewpoints reflect a bias.
His admonition of the contributors to The Iranian is quite humorous
given his "bias". Furthermore, by criticizing the writings of
Laleh Khalili and Shalizeh Nadjmi, he trivializes the legitimate concerns
and voices of Iranian women.
Couching this chauvinism in accusations of "zede Iran", Mr.
Banaei is only illustrating his simplistic understanding of the larger
issues facing the Iranian diaspora. Would he be content if women only wrote
what he believes or didn't write at all? After years of struggling as veritable
second class citizens, Iranian women are finding a voice and a forum to
It is curiously ironic that at a time when President Khatami is struggling
to guide the country on a course towards openness, tolerance and democratization,
we encounter this sort of myopic analysis. I have no problems with Banaei
speaking openly, and if I did, I certainly wouldn't accuse him of being
Go to top
May 3, 1999
* Attempt to reconstruct reality
From open letter in October 1997: Dr. Soroush was in a position of responsibility
when the Iranian academic community was under the most serious intellectual,
psychological and even physical assault. I do not recall hearing a word
of support from Dr. Soroush. I said I find it delightfully ironic that
my association comes to the defense of a man who regards himself as an
intellectual but was a part of the machinery that destroyed an intellectual
community. Be it a reminder to those who may be in the position of power
today. Be it an example for those who have eyes and can see ... FULL TEXT
Go to top
* Why so blatantly biased?
I cannot help but notice the "zede-enqelaab" or even "zede-Iran"
bias of your magazine. A simple browse over the list of articles available
reveals this. You have the assimilationist piece by Guive
Mirfendereski, an adolescent article by Pejman
Mosleh, a thoroughly boring piece of fiction by Massud
Alemi, a couple gharbzadeh-esque articles from Laleh
Khalili, the article from Shalizeh
Nadjmi that is little more than a thinly veiled rationalization of
her Black man fetish, the collection of pictures from the pre-Revolutionary
Air Force (who cares!?), the typically mediocre poetry of yet another
gharbzadeh young Iranian woman, Leyla
Momeny. ... Why is your magazine so blatantly biased? ... FULL TEXT
Go to top
Copyright © Abadan Publishing Co. All Rights Reserved.
May not be duplicated or distributed in any form