BBC: Story of the revolution

email us

US Transcom
US Transcom

Shahin & Sepehr


Sehaty Foreign Exchange

Advertise with The Iranian

January 24-28, 2000 / Bahman 4-8, 1378


* Prostitution:
- Alarmed

- Distasteful, but valuable


* Christian roots:
- Abandon emotionalism
- Selectively polite

* Immigration:
- Sad joke
- What a land
Iranian of the century:
- Load of bullocks

- Opinions so obviously Iranian
- Fitzgerald's debt to Khayyam
Robin Wright:
- Fantasy

* Iran-U.S.:
- All political

- Just a game

email us

January 28, 2000

* Alarmed

I am alarmed by the disparity between your "feature" pieces. One high and one like this ["Nice ladies, amigo?"]

What can I say? I am not a moralist nor do I oppose freedom of expression. However, I wonder why such a piece should be included in The Iranian? What are the informative, investigative, or literary aspects of this piece qualifying it for publication? How can one generalize about a community by visiting one brothel and talking to three girls?

No serious editor will find this kind of individual observation worthy of publication. Please do not allow The Iranian to be brought to the level of pieces like this >>> MORE

Akbar Mahdi

Go to top

* Distasteful, but valuable

I do understand your concern. This piece ["Nice ladies, amigo?"] does not meet high journalistic standards. But I think it is still interesting as a personal account of an aspect of Iranian life in America which is never officially talked about. Several of my friends have told me about how often Iranians go to the brothels in Tijuana and I have always wondered what goes on there and why. I think this is a social phenomenon that should be noticed.

Of course I would have preferred an article by a professional journalist or a scholar. But I think personal stories can be valuable -- even if they are unprofessional, distasteful or about controversial subjects. Maybe such crude stories will open some eyes and pave the way toward more serious discussions and studies.

And another important point, I think, is that Internet-based publications such as cannot be compared to traditional magazines and newspapers. The Internet is more personal and interactive, and therefore it is not as polished and heavily edited as the print media. That's why I prefer the Internet. It is more real, and being real is not always pretty or tasteful >>> MORE

Jahanshah Javid

Go to top

January 27, 2000

* Fantasy

All I want to know is how much was Robin Wright paid to write this ["The last great revolution"].

Was she actually writing about Iran? It seems like she has written about a fantasy land that the Islamic government keeps insisting that it exists but nobody believes them.

Well, now they have found someone that believes in that fantasy.


Go to top

* Load of bullocks

The result of your survey is a load of bullocks ["Iranians of the century"]. The Shah of Iran tried to turn Iran into a normal, free country and people like you survey religeous freaks and name some shithead ["Mohammad Mossadegh"] as the Iranian of the century.


Go to top

* Abandon emotionalism

I am afraid I have hurt Mr Tabib's feelings more than I intended to, assuming that he is of a more robust stock than is the case ["Blind patriotism"]. My contempt is not for Mr Tabib's person but for his opinion. I am sure he is a valuable member of society who contributes in his own way.

Now to the crux of the argument: there is some talk of patriotism in the opening passage of Mr Tabib's letter. It amuses me that he did not get my point last time. Whether Christmas is of Persian or not has no bearing on my national pride so that his quote, as touching as it may be is superfluous.

As for juxtaposition of my obligation to respond and my perceived harshness, I merely invite him to look up the difference between etiquette and politeness. I also invite Mr Tabib to abandon his emotionalism and speak factually instead of plead for sympathy >>> FULL TEXT

Arash Salardini

Go to top

January 26, 2000

* Selectively polite

Since when has it been recorded in the short history of Iranians in America where a guy goes up to an Iranian woman to introduce himself, and gets anything other than a rude, arrogant response? ["Most polite people in the world"]

I should qualify this: since when has it been recorded where a man, NOT driving a BMW or other expensive car, goes up to a good-looking Iranian woman and gets anything other than a rude, arrogant response?

This I want to know. Or MAYBE beautiful Iranian women reserve their haughtiness, arrogance, and complexities only for Iranian men. It's a different story for those fortunate khaareji men who have a decent look about them.

As for Mr. Guillen, all I have to say is that yes, Iranians are very polite people, but only to non-Iranians.

My friend, if you knew Iranian culture any better you'd realize how some Iranians treat their fellow countrymen/women, and it is anything but 'polite' and 'classy'.


Go to top

* Sad joke

I read that article on discrimination against Iranians in U.S. border posts, fingerprinting and stuff like that.

Now, this is a new discovery, they would not only make Iranian citizens miserable to get all kinds of U.S. visas but they would also keep a spouse from coming to U.S. to gurantee that his wife would go HOME after graduation.

And this rule does not apply if the husband is the student. YES.. Only WOMEN have to CONVINCE the consular officer that they need to share their moments with their husband. Because it's set by DEFAULT that men do... No questions asked. Equal opportunities...Just another SAD joke.

Raha Zand

Go to top

January 25, 2000

* Iran. What a land

Iran. What a land. What a people.I have lived away from it for almost 30 years, but, have visited frequently. I love the country, the people, the desert, the brick walls, the trees, the crows, and the trenches of water that run in every direction.

I am so saddened by the conditions in Iran. The pollution, poverty, dirt, illiteracy, lack of medicine and medical facilities. At a time when the world is accelerating toward technology to better human's living conditions, Iran is holding back the people in the dark ages.

"Internet" is sold by Kilo-Bytes, making it expensive and impractical for many. What do you think would happen if Iranians got educated? Tehran is drowned in its smoke. People are dying at ages of 40 and 50 of heart attacks and strokes due to stress and over-exhaustion by working two jobs >>> FULL TEXT


Go to top

* Opinions so obviously Iranian

It is interesting to have seen this survey and the myriad of results ["Iranians of the century"]; as well as the different opinions so obviously Iranian in the fact that they are heated and opinionated!

Being a polisci-major during my undergrad I debated with several Iranian classmates on this very issue about 10-years-ago: "personality cults" versus "media attention" versus "real results" (whether for good or for bad on any particular nation-state, such as Iran) are the real questions when deciding on who is a man-of-prominence deserving the title, "man of the century".

For Iran, it is interesting on the one hand to note that there isn't anyone prominent in the arts or sciences during this turbulent century, unlike the Iran of bygone-eras with names like Abu Ali Sina, for instance >>> FULL TEXT

Cyrus Rafaat

Go to top

January 24, 2000

* All political

I went to two soccer games -- Iran vs. Ecuador and Iran vs. USA. There was a huge difference. Both in players and audience. However, it was all about politics and our lives in the U.S. We started our lives here because of politics and now we somehow want to sweep our past under the rug so we can justify our lives here and ease our conscience.

The games in general were representative of our dual lives, a paradox of being semi immigrants. One foot here and one foot ready to move. Or maybe now both feet are planted here but our past haunts us. The audience was so determined to be civilized and not to appear political . Was that for the benefit of American brothers or for the Islamic Republic brothers? Did we want to show that we are not terrorists? That we are apolitical soccer-loving immigrants? We were also determined not to put the seal of approval on the Islamic Republic in a obvious way.

Yekee bood..Yekee nabood >>> FULL TEXT

S. Irani

Go to tp

* Just a game

Let me start by saying that what a well written .....Reflection ["All tied up"]. I never thought one could read SO much into a soccer match. I suppose you can also foretell the weather by the way your bunions act up?

The Iran-USA soccer match was a friendly game. I wasn't there but watched the game on TV. I wish I'd have been there to celebrate it with the other Iranians and Iranian-Americans. My face would have been painted with both the Iranian and US flags AND I would have been waiving one of those double sided flags.

In case you have forgotten, we're NOT living in Iran. This is the USA where one can participate in demonstrations at lunch break, and head back to work afterwards without a stopover at Evin prison. SAVAMA or Passdaran don't have much bearings on our daily lives here. So, even though you feel that the battle for our individuality as Iranians is lost, and we are disillusioned, how have you won this battle?

You should feel rather content, since I know you're not happy, that you can write out your "reflections" and not get hauled into Evin for high tea! Obviously, no nation is without faults. While one brach of the US government/society is trying to extend ties to Iran yet another is building attack/strategy scenarios in case Iran comes in possession of nuclear arms. One hand washes the other. It has been like this in the US for quite an extended period of time.

However sometimes a game is just that.....a game. This was a GOOD game.

Ali S.

Go to top

* Fitzgerald's debt to Khayyam

I enjoyed the enthusiasm that emanated from Mr. Kadivar's article "Great Omar" and subtitled "Khayyam's debt to Fitzgerald". I too agree that Fitzgerald's translation is a masterpiece which will remain the very pinnacle of the art of poetic translation.

However, Mr. Kadivar is wrong, for Khayyam owes nothing to Fitzgerald. Khayyam's poetry survived hundreds of years prior to Fitzgerald, and will survive many more. In iran, many are able to recite a few of the Rubaees, but only a few know Fitzgerald. Therefore it is incorrect to suppose that "with no Fitzgerald there would have been no Omar". Despite assertions by some English authors, Fitzgerald's never surpasses the brilliance of the original. And brilliant it is.

Khayyam's poetry is a jewel that will last for as long as there is humanity; Fitzgerald made this jewel available to more humans. It is much more likely that Fitzgerald would have been forgotten had he not been so inspired by the Rubaees, and so one can say that perhaps with no Omar there would have been no Fitzgerald.

Korosh Khalili

Go to top

Copyright © Abadan Publishing Co. All Rights Reserved. May not be duplicated or distributed in any form

 MIS Internet Services

Web Site Design by
Multimedia Internet Services, Inc

 GPG Internet server

Internet server by
Global Publishing Group.

Letters archive

email us