How Useful Are Iranian Know-It-Alls And Their Advice? Part 8

Share/Save/Bookmark

How Useful Are Iranian Know-It-Alls And Their Advice? Part 8
by JahanKhalili
23-Nov-2011
 

The last blog entry in this series concerned what was REALLY in Cyrus the Great's cylinder.

Given all the false claims about it that Iranians were believing, it seems evident that none of them ever actually checked.

Iranians are good at making, sharing and believing rumors. The upper class "Westernized" Iranians are the best at it - better than their lower class religious countrymen.

They have a little "knowledge" economy. Its more advanced than the one Iranian villagers have. They spread rumors and gossip among themselves - across hundreds of kilometers!

 

With the aid of cellphones and computer chips! Their gossip spreads at the speed of light!

 

Aren't they superior? 

 

In Iranian culture, knowledge is gained by listening to other Iranians. Since Iranians love to be at the top of their little totem-pole-like society, they want to be the "know-it-all" that everyone listens to.

They are masters at believing bullshit. 

They even believe their OWN bullshit.

They made up that stuff about Cyrus's cylinder, and then they believed it.

But independent checking is beyond them.

In Iranian culture, knowledge does NOT come from investigation or research that is independent of authority.

While the Iranian reputation-dorks were busy consulting each other and spreading around bullshit, foreigners ignored them, and discovered things in Iran.

*****************************************

Above is a photo taken of the Behistun inscription.

Its discovery paved the way for ancient Persian to be read and translated.

How was ancient Persian deciphered and translated?

I'm no expert, and am really just beginning to learn about this. Anyone out there who knows more than me, please feel free to correct anything I say here.

However, it appears that the Behistun inscription - Iran's equivalent to the Rosetta Stone, which was an important discovery that helped pave the way for that language to be decoded and understood - was NOT discovered by Iranians.

Iran's past lay buried and forgotten for centuries and centuries - quite Ironically, under big oblivious self-important Iranian noses. Foreigners finally discovered it.

Iranians had of course known about the area before. Iranian poet Firdausi made up some interesting bullshit about it that wasn't true (In fact, it became a real hit. Iranians are good at something, at least).

But an Englishman named Robert Sherley was the first to finally bring it to the attention of Western scholars. He also made up some bullshit about it that wasn't true. (It seems to be part of human nature to make up bullshit about things that they haven't fully investigated). 

Carsten Niebuhr published the transcriptions in his book in Europe, allowing Georg Friedrich Grotefend and others to try deciphering them. Grotefend discovered that ancient Persian was alphabetic, and that each word was separated by a slanted symbol. He succeeded in deciphering some of the text. 

Sir Henry Rawlinson, a British Army officer, picked up where Grotefend left off.

Two foreigners - a British Army officer and a German scholar - played a key role in uncovering the mystery of ancient Persian cuneiform for the modern world.

 

Like the Rosetta Stone in Egypt, the Behistun inscription was decoded with the help of Western scholars using ancient Greek. The German scholar Grotefend was able to decipher some of it.

The British army officer - sir Henry Rawlinson - deciphered the rest.

It is thanks to this discovery - and the work of deciphering the characters - that we can read this ancient language Iranian language.

Without this discovery, no one would know what was in the cyrus cylinder.

So the usual question that everyone by now is wincing with anticipation at: why didn't Iranians discover this?

*******************************

Once again, I'm going to state here that the majority of Iranians were probably living under extreme poverty. They didn't have the luxury to care about such things.

They deserve neither scorn nor criticism.

The Iranians at the top of their social hierarchy however probably had at least the material means to engage in things other than a struggle for physical survival.

If they could build palaces and enjoy their wealth, and throw parties for each other, they could have gone out and studied what was in their surroundings. But they didn't.

Perhaps they had to play their role, and couldn't deviate from it, otherwise their competition would gossip about them and overthrow them for being "strange".

Iranian upper class society - as primitive as it is - is very competitive.

The upkeep of pomp is almost a matter of life and death.

Each Iranian is a miniature Shah or Ayatollah, who needs to keep his hold on his domain or get overthrown. All their energy is devoted to controlling things.

So while important Iranian tribal leaders counted their gold coins, received flattery and homage from their underlings, consulted with each other, or frothed at the mouth over some stupid half-imagined insult from another official, foreigners inside Iran ignored the ridiculous Iranian social hubbub because they were never a part of it. 

Therefor they had no trouble going out and investigating Iran's wilderness.

I didn't put the picture of either Rawlinson or Grotefend on this blog. An Iranian would have. That's because Iranians worship people. But Westerners are interested in the discovery itself. 

This should be a lesson to Iranians who want to do anything similar. A pioneering spirit requires ignoring the distractions of the society and people around you.

Iranian society - with its petty obsession about politics - retards individual creativity and ingenuity.

The social prattle of Iranians is noise to people who are truly curious about the world. There is nothing more fascinating to an explorer than the world, and nothing less so than exchanging flattery with idiots who aren't interested in it.

Even the most upper class Iranians who live in the West and who fancy themselves to be the most well-endowed fruits of their country, are sorry specimens.

They remain Iranians, despite everything.

None of them have that spirit of discovery that Westerners have had. All they are good at is bullshitting, getting titles, recognitions, and the mundane sort of social prizes that bureaucrats get.

They live to get a pat on their little heads from others.

No discoveries and certainly nothing groundbreaking has been achieved by these Iranians.

They gather in flocks, and fight over their titles the way little birds fight over crumbs, and they prance about in each other's company, competing to see who has the best plumage.

Meanwhile, American eagles and Western falcons soar the skies alone, looking for things.

They avoided gatherings and flocks, and struck out towards the unknown alone.

Their friend was the sky, their domain the earth.

The thrill of discovery awaits them, not Iranians.

So there you have it.

 

Its the Persian paradox. 

 

Iranian know-it-alls are the enemies of knowledge. 

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from JahanKhalili
 
JahanKhalili

The great cylinder

by JahanKhalili on

Yeah, its a nice little dildo for Iranian egos to get off on.

If they were actually interested in the cylinder itself, they'd have known what was in it; they'd have gone and read the translation. 


JahanKhalili

After his conquest

by JahanKhalili on

Who knows?

He needed a prize, and since there was no one bigger and more important than himself, he had one made for him. 

Iranians love an audience. Their main objection to these blogs is that it makes people think Iranians are idiots (which isn't far from the truth). They can't have that, of course. 

He might have even massacred those people he mentions in his cylinder, for all we know, but latter claimed it was "all good".

We have no way of verifying or corroborating any of it. 


JahanKhalili

What prompted the creation of the Cyrus cylinder?

by JahanKhalili on

Waders wonders.

We can only speculate, of course.

But knowing Iranians, Cyrus probably wanted to brag about himself and exagerate his achievements. 


JahanKhalili

Yes, of course

by JahanKhalili on

Most have you just try to dismiss what I showed you and not even deal with it. 

So, what's new? 


Waders

JK, Who created these cylinders for others to discover?

by Waders on

and what prompted the pre-Islamic Iranians to create these! 

As far as why Iranians this and that, this question is not particular to iranians alone although it is more relevant to us and non-westerners for the time being. 

We all ask these questions from ourselves at some point but many can wright it off as unimportant and take refuge from its hunting and degrading force,

in the after life pre-occupation and its limited instruction on how to deal with this world and others.

Its just simply is and easy pass thru enabled by out of context, and ambiguous religiously sanctioned promises of afterlife.

This apathy for making progress in this world is an acquired social ailment for many not a genetic disposition in Iranians. 

and although your un-constructive ways of expressing your perplexity and your fatal lack of knowledge in religion and its magnificent decisive influence in the direction of its masses, makes a reply unwarranted

yet many Iranians for the most part are genetically pitiful and fair minded when they deal with naive or humble souls and thus some reply.

So read on what sociopolitical role religion has played at least for the post industrial revolution period which concerns most of your bechins and leave the size of our nose alone unless you wish to alienate your two confused half even further! 

 

 


amirkabear4u

Baldrick know-it-all

by amirkabear4u on

you may consider this;

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACnqI1l4I9s

haha


JahanKhalili

Certainly, Rea

by JahanKhalili on

Little boy lost in the wilderness I am.

Its the only way to discover anything out there. 


JahanKhalili

Does compute

by JahanKhalili on

Because we are talking about a physical reality that our five senses tell us about.

Your God comparison doesn't compute, because God cannot be observed. 


Tiger Lily

JK< that is so cool!

by Tiger Lily on

I mean the quote about the pride and blame post. ;)

LOL!!!

 

As for the argument, that 

"If it was, the concept of race wouldn't have existed in all societies, throughout all points of history.


It wouldn't be universal."

 

does not compute! It's (one of ) the same argument used for the existence of god. Does not compute.

 


Rea

Read it all, dully, 1 to 8

by Rea on

Due respect, so far have not learnt anything. Except, there is a little boy lost in wilderness.


JahanKhalili

Taking Pride and Blame

by JahanKhalili on

I agree with that being unimportant.

"I remember once a fellow Jew remarking with satisfaction on the high percentage of Nobel Prize winners who were Jewish. I said, 'Does that make you feel superior?' 'Of course,' he said. 'What if I told you that sixty percent of the pornographers and eighty percent of the crooked Wall Street manipulators were Jewish? He was startled. 'Is that true?' 'I don't know. I made up the figures. But what if it were true? Would it make you feel inferior?' He had to think about that. It's much easier to find reasons to consider oneself superior than inferior. But one is just the mirror image of the other.'" -- Isaac Asimov

 


JahanKhalili

Race Not a Social Construct, Tiger Lily

by JahanKhalili on

If it was, the concept of race wouldn't have existed in all societies, throughout all points of history.

It wouldn't be universal.

But it is. 


Tiger Lily

Hia, JK. Nope, incorrect

by Tiger Lily on

That paper is rather desperate and  refers to specific visible phenotypes, which often skip generations etc.. Even in epi-genetics, the emphasis is on predominant diseases etc. within the human "race"/species.

In any case, I disagree with the whole lot of locational identity as the primary or basic concept in identity for many reasons. In a Global Village with immediate communication technology it's not conducive to anything to concentrate on such limited constructions. 

 

JK, my emphasis was on making good judgments. I have my own list of grievances with "Iranians", but I try not to judge an entire society, simply on that basis, although I'm well aware of predominant behavioral traits.

Btw, do I take any pride nor responsibility for the actions of Iranians past or present. very much as I'm not responsible for your opinions, as you say in your  blog heading. ;)

That doesn't mean that I don't appreciate them or not have a right to be abhorred...

P.S. You might be interested in this, that was posted last night:

//iranian.com/main/2011/nov/jahanbegloo-i...

 

 

 


JahanKhalili

BTW Mr. Ala

by JahanKhalili on

While you're skipping pork over here, adventerous Americans are over in Iran, sampling some Iranian wild pork, courtesy of the Islamic Republic!

Mmmm, mmmm!

//www.iranjasminsafarico.com/iran-wild-boar-hunting-safari.htm 


JahanKhalili

You Cannot Escape Judgement

by JahanKhalili on

Iranians who are masters of it, must finally be subjected to it themselves.


JahanKhalili

Cross Roads of the Conquerors

by JahanKhalili on

I agree with Tiger Lily's reference to Iran being like a four-way intersection for conquerors.

Conquest carries a price, and Iran has paid that price many times. 


JahanKhalili

Hi Tiger Lily

by JahanKhalili on

Race isn't a social construct.

Its genetic.

//www.world-science.net/exclusives/exclusives-nfrm/050128_race.htm


Tiger Lily

P.S. It was the Jews' fault

by Tiger Lily on

young Finkel and his cronies insisted on the phony translations and there you have it, before the Persians could even lift an eyebrow,  down in the history books of academia it was, as the gospel truth of a set of decrees for human rights, marketed by the Brits.

go blame them!


Tiger Lily

race is a social construct, apart from that,

by Tiger Lily on

I've told you before, that you cannot make good judgements about a society simply on the grounds of personal experience.

It's also plain silly to compare a newly emerged middle-class, especially after a revolution of a Third World country with a people, more or less established in their class system, who have their own differentiating traits from state to state, thousands of miles away.

 

Mohammad Ala. Iran has been the cross-road and the invaded of many 'civilizations' , hence your 'food' anecdote.

There must be loads of sociologypapers out there for both of you to study, as you show so much interest in the subject.

 

 


JahanKhalili

So Mr. Ala

by JahanKhalili on

I'm not only obliged to care about Iranians - who are my father's people.

I'm also obliged to care about my mother's.

Iranians don't get my exclusive loyalty. 


JahanKhalili

In fact

by JahanKhalili on

There is no political group in America itself that advocates for white Americans, enjoys the same legitimacy as non-white lobbies, and is allowed to lobby the US government on their behalf.


JahanKhalili

Respect Isn't a One Way Street

by JahanKhalili on

It has to be mutual.

If I see Iranians here bitching at white Americans over a conflict of group interests between them, I'll probably side with white Americans.

There is and was no one in Iran to represent the interest of Americans, and the Iranian government certainly would not allow any Americans there to lobby it on their behalf.

Iranians have no business trying to change the West or America to suit themselves.

I would much prefer that they express gratitude towards white America for the benefits that they've received from it.

None of you have experienced the conflict between Iran and the West as I have, and none of you can reach Westerners as well as I can, or understand them as well as I can. 


Mohammad Ala

I believe you care...

by Mohammad Ala on

Jahan jan;

A handful of white Americans who I know also do not eat bacon in the USA or other countries where we went to lecture or present papers.  Each person has his or her own reasons and I have mine.   I would love to eat your Mom’s cooking but I will skip the bacon.

Let us work together to improve Iranian community.  We need your help . . .  I believe you care otherwise you would not spend so much time here.  I appreciate your time and efforts to raise awareness and look forward to working together.

You did not “get” what I wrote about Iranians who discovered Iranian artifacts!!


JahanKhalili

So Mr. Ala

by JahanKhalili on

If I invited you over to eat my mom's cooking, and she fixed you some bacon, would you eat it?


Mohammad Ala

I am willing to learn . . .

by Mohammad Ala on

I travelled with American (white) colleagues to conferences and to other countries.  For example, in China, most Americans asked for Hamburger with fries or Pasta.  I ate whatever Chinese colleagues ate.

My life style, cars, etc. would demonstrate to you that I was not rich, but succeeded in America and even wrote a book that was used in many universities.  I used my own lecture notes for classes I taught and for most of the classes I did not require a textbook.

In your blogs, you show your bad side more than your good side… why?  Cannot we benefit from your wisdom to improve Iranian society?  I am willing to learn.


JahanKhalili

PS

by JahanKhalili on

I'm only half-Iranian.

Thankfully. 


JahanKhalili

Mr. Ala

by JahanKhalili on

Iranians benefit from the West. They study Western textbooks even in Iranian universities.

Whatever awards you won in competetion with Americans, you probably wouldn't have been able to win them without the Americans, their universities and their education.

As for food, Iranians eat American food while here. I don't know any American who lived in Iran who didn't eat Iranian food.

You're comparing yourself to the average American, instead of to Americans who do travel abroad.

The average Iranian doesn't travel abroad, either.

Nor are they so willing to try American food, in Iran.

I knew an Iranian family who threw away an American chocolate cake that their American neighbor had baked for them, because they considered it to be najes


JahanKhalili

Mr. Ala

by JahanKhalili on

If you know about archeological artifacts that were discovered by Iranians, please share that information.


Mohammad Ala

JK, Wrong...

by Mohammad Ala on

Jahan jan; you are wrong again.

Where I taught, there were 70 white American Phd's and 40 non-Americans.  The 80% of Outstanding Professor Awards were won by non-Americans.  I have twenty other Awards to demonstrate that I did compete and won the Awards.

I did most of my travelling in the USA using Amtrak bus or train and my station wagon which some nights I slept in it.  I was not well to do and I am now well to do now (LOL).

How about food?  Most Americans (white) are narrow minded about food and other matters.  I ate lunch with a faculty in one day and another day with a student every week when I taught.  I know what I am talking about.

Anyway, you are part of us, you are part of no good people, LOL.


JahanKhalili

Something you ignore, Mr. Ala

by JahanKhalili on

Despite your individual abilities or curiosities, the fact that you have to come here - or that so many Iranians have to - is evidence that Iran is lacking something.

There are many motivations for Iranians leaving Iran for abroad. One of them is the fact that there are more opportunities abroad for self-advancement than there are in Iran.

This does not reflect well on Iranians, of course.

But the fact that so many of them are here is not simply the result of their curiosity.

Also, what kind of curiosity are we talking about?

I met so many Iranians in Iran who only wanted to go abroad so that they could experience sexual freedom.

In fact, I'd say it is one of the most important reasons why the outside world - particularly the West - is attractive to Iranian men. 

That is the equivalent of an explorer or someone who is seeking knowledge for its own sake?

If so, there should be a new category of Nobel Prize - whoring, which Iranians would probably have a good chance at winning. 

I don't admire those people.

They want to come and fornicate with my mother's people - in other words, take advantage of them, while they are in the grip of the destruction of their culture and old ways and are succumbing to the corrupting effect of Hollywood and pornography?