Thanks for the explanation. I couldn't connect the dots because in the past you had used these characters in other roles. For example, the US guy looks like George Michael in Michael Jackson's clothes and I think in the past he was used as a Monarchist or Shahi. And the Iraqi guy was used as a Communist before.
I f U.S. can take 300,000 soldiers all the way across the world to illegally invade a sovereign nation that posed no threat to it (and now make clear it will be staying there for the long term,) how can it accuse the next door neighbors of "interfering" in "internal" matters of Iraq? If anyone is interfering in the region, shouldn't that be the U.S. government first and before all else? I'd say get out first and then we may believe your well intentions, otherwise you are actually inviting the interference you supposedly detest so much.
Thank you for your comments, both Mahmood and others.
by 135 (not verified) on Wed Jun 11, 2008 09:12 AM PDT
The character represents US Army in Iraq
.
The isurgencies(roadside bombing, car bombing, suicide bombing, etc) in Iraq is blamed on Iran.
Actualy whatever happens in neigbouring countries or region which does not fit in US political agenda, Iran is to be held responsible for, despite of having no hard evidence.
In some cases, the insurgencies are planned, funded and operated secretly by a ruling system in order to convince, convert or intimidate the public mind on a specific subject, or intentionally cause friction between two political or religious groups. These sort of operations mainly categorised as False-Flag. A very recent example is the rising tension between sunni and shi'it in mid-east.
The news of the day
by Qioumars on Wed Jun 11, 2008 01:37 PM PDTاحمدی نژاد: حسرت یک نیشگون از ایران به دل بوش مانده
Vive Mahmoud khareh
Now it makes sense
by Anonymouse on Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:54 AM PDTThanks for the explanation. I couldn't connect the dots because in the past you had used these characters in other roles. For example, the US guy looks like George Michael in Michael Jackson's clothes and I think in the past he was used as a Monarchist or Shahi. And the Iraqi guy was used as a Communist before.
For Mahmood Mahmoodi
by eyeranian on Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:44 AM PDTI f U.S. can take 300,000 soldiers all the way across the world to illegally invade a sovereign nation that posed no threat to it (and now make clear it will be staying there for the long term,) how can it accuse the next door neighbors of "interfering" in "internal" matters of Iraq? If anyone is interfering in the region, shouldn't that be the U.S. government first and before all else? I'd say get out first and then we may believe your well intentions, otherwise you are actually inviting the interference you supposedly detest so much.
Thank you for your comments, both Mahmood and others.
One goes another country, destroys a nation
by Abarmard on Wed Jun 11, 2008 09:49 AM PDTThen blames the other for interfering!
A comical reality
Iran did it again
by 135 (not verified) on Wed Jun 11, 2008 09:12 AM PDTThe character represents US Army in Iraq
.
The isurgencies(roadside bombing, car bombing, suicide bombing, etc) in Iraq is blamed on Iran.
Actualy whatever happens in neigbouring countries or region which does not fit in US political agenda, Iran is to be held responsible for, despite of having no hard evidence.
In some cases, the insurgencies are planned, funded and operated secretly by a ruling system in order to convince, convert or intimidate the public mind on a specific subject, or intentionally cause friction between two political or religious groups. These sort of operations mainly categorised as False-Flag. A very recent example is the rising tension between sunni and shi'it in mid-east.
I can't undrestand what the
by Mahmood Mahmoodi (not verified) on Wed Jun 11, 2008 05:09 AM PDTI can't undrestand what the last pic means.
Good point
by Abarmard on Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:08 AM PDTThat's how it is :)
Post new comment