| Title | Date | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Boycotting Ahmadinejad's U.S. Visit? | Aug 30 | 89 |
| Sarah Palin & Those who laugh last! | Sep 03 | 84 |
| Charlie Rose interviews Ahmadinejad | Aug 26 | 71 |
| Behnam's pleas before his execution | Aug 27 | 55 |
| Genesis of Shi’a Islam | Aug 28 | 50 |
| Person | About | Day |
|---|---|---|
| Shanbehzadeh | Saeed & Naghib, father and son, Bushehri musicians | Sep 04 |
| Maziar Bahari | Documentary filmmaker talks about Iraq and Iraqis | Sep 04 |
| Mehdi Rohani | "Eagle of Iran" | Sep 03 |
| Sheida Hodge | Cross cultural training | Sep 03 |
| Jolly old man | Sings "Aabe Nabaat" | Sep 03 |
| Farinaz | Rapper Farinaz performs "Be Name Zan" ("In the Name of Women") | Aug 30 |
| Bboy Parviz | Best break dancer, ever! | Aug 30 |
| Reza Farnoush | Drag Queen | Aug 29 |
| Hamed Haddadi | First Iranian in U.S. pro basketball league | Aug 29 |
| Farnoosh Torabi | TheStreet.com TV correspondent | Aug 29 |
re
by vhedf (not verified) on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:53 AM CDTHi! i found a lot of films here, of course if you are using rapidshare premium account http:// megauploadfiles.com
megaupload search
It's too late but
by Abarmard on Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:11 AM CSTIt's too late now but I believe that with Shah we would be an advance country with a great economy. UAE would be placed in Bandar Abbas (as it was supposed to be the hub). We would benefit from oil and service economy. I don't claim that the revolution was done by the west, but I do believe that the west had a hand in overthrowing or speeding the overthrow of Shah.
Now that Shah is gone and we know what we could be, we should not fall for the same traps and be played. We must believe in our nation and focus our attention to our people inside the country. I am not sure what would be the best solution, and if you are not sure don't rush into something. Yet I read one comment in Iranian.com that I absolutely agree with and that is we need to help the Iranians inside by pushing the western regimes to lift the sanctions. Economical path is a valid method to political openness, especially for Iran. People will take care of business once they have time to "itch their head".
Whatever
by Anonymous whatever (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 08:37 PM CSTWhatever shah was or was not, whatever he did or did not, iran and iranians had their best days in at least 200 years during his reign: peace, economic growth, development, education, and prosperity for a vast majority, except of course for those who focused on opposing him to grab power, like islamists and leftists. those days are long gone and frequent travelers to iran know that attitudes inside iran is much different these days, and many young and old long for those good old days, and curse the shah but for letting them down and handing the country to mullas.
John Carpenter
by bahareh (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 07:28 PM CSTYo Johnny,
We're sorry, won't you come on home...
YOU ARE THE LOOSER!!!
The greatest man...
by Laleh (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 07:26 PM CSTWhat a great man, we really did not deserve him! He was too good for us.
:)
by leading nader and all his degrees like a little doggie (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 07:15 PM CST:)
I am an American who worked in Isfahan during the 70's
by Dick Cox (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 06:53 PM CSTThe Shahinshah was a great visionary who wanted to modernize his nation. And sometimes he had to resort to iron fist to put down the mollahs and after 911 we understand why. All in all he was a great patriot and great friend of America.
Afarin bar to farzande pake Iran
by Kiana (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 06:07 PM CSTKaveh Jon,
I totally agree with you.
Thank you
Khafeh show Bacheh haroomzadeh!!
by John Carpenter II (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 06:05 PM CSTListen to your Dad and shut your trap. Ok?
but...we have democracy now!
by no_name (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 04:21 PM CSTSay what you want, but we have a real democracy now...we even have a space program, nuclear technology, we assemble pegut, benz, we are doing scholarly work on the history of Holocaust, we are building jet fighters, and the list goes on. If you are reading and nodding along you are an idiot!
We have yet to do the basic refinery work and we need India and China to do it for us. We should have been the jewel of the Mid-east and be the financial, trade, cultural and technological hub in the region. But instead we got the Napoleon-syndrome loud mouth, a crippling oil infrastructure, and embarrassment to our great culture.
Let's blame ourselves, az mast ke bar mast!
Mohammad Reza Shah was a disaster
by John Carpenter III (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 04:15 PM CSTThe biggest idiot from the 1940s until 1979 was Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
He was a nut who believed that Imam Mahdi could cure his cancer. What a nut.
The Shah was a loser.
His White Revolution failed.
His 2500 year celebration was a waste of money.
His SAVAK led to a revolution.
And even Khomeyni was smarter than Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
Implement what?
He did nothing for Iran.
Any advance made during 1925-1979 would have happened no matter who was in charge.
Do you believe the Mullahs are the reason that Iran has internet access?
Come on, be REAL.
The Shah was a loser. The Pahlavis are losers.
he was right
by MRX1 (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 02:36 PM CSTand had he stayed in power and got the chance of implementing policies he wanted to do, the whole region including Iran would have looked far different than what it is today. Sadly he took a fight with people, organizations and governments that were far more powerfull and more curel than he ever imagnied. Indeed this was begining to an end.
The Idea Was a Great One, But.........
by Kaveh Nouraee on Mon Feb 11, 2008 01:09 PM CSTUnfortunately it had no chance of success when the U.S. and British governments threw so much money at OPEC to maintain the status quo.
Had Mohammad Reza Shah's idea been implemented and put into practice, we would be seeing a much different balance of economic power in the world today.
Re: People who are looking towards the west
by Wondering (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:54 AM CSTXerXes said it best. While it is useful to realize that Shah's mistake was to pick a fight with someone way bigger than him with no internal support - whether his fault for being disconnected from his people or simply going to fast, it is more important to take the lesson that not only the Western Imperialist has no interest in improving Iran, but in fact they are keeping the country in the shape that it is because it serves their criminal purposes. It is time to realize that the mullahs are nobodies - just puppets. And those who target mullahs, ignoring the Western imperialists, or worse, ask the Western imperialists to help for a regime change, are just fools not realizing what is going on. Apparently Reza Pahlavi is now hoping that the West will remove mullahs and bring him or someone democratic in power. What these people don't realize is that the Western imperialists have no interest in bringing democracy and modernization to Iran. It would be completely against their wishes. Reza Pahlavi has NOTHING to offer the Western imperialists. The mullah's regime is FAR better to them than anything else right now. I hope we will realize this and stop targeting the wrong "enemy."
I told Shah but he did not listen
by Miz-abdol-azim khaneh Ghareeb (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:36 AM CSTI told him in 1970, that the best alternative for Iran would be to close the British embassy and all its consulates, stop assembly of Paykan autos and start building Mercedes Benz. I also suggested that we bring Shahreh-no Tehran to where the British Embassy is located and make it easier for the fornicators to have fun!
First he agreed, but then Farah interferred and the case was dropped and here we are! LOOOL
People who are looking towards the west
by XerXes (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 09:06 AM CSTPeople who are looking towards the west to solve the Iranian issues must watch this and realize that IT IS the west that we are like the way we are...
Dejavu
by Alborzi (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 06:06 AM CSTWasn't this the logical conclusion of what
M ossadegh did 28 years before?
to All self appointed oil experts
by Oil engineer (not verified) on Mon Feb 11, 2008 05:14 AM CSTHow many nations can you name who are "connected" to their country's oil negotiations? Did you expect him to be submissive to the oil powers? Then you would have said he was just a puppet in the hands of the multinationals. You guys speak through your bottom's orifice.
Boil
by Aboil Danesh (not verified) on Sun Feb 10, 2008 07:59 PM CSTOil business is genericly and fundamentally is a gang deriven business-- just like heroin cartels...
In this bonding and bond business you are either in it or you are not... but the catch is once you are in it you must be in it for the rest of your time-- zero tolerace for the quitters-- no if and no but...
Bond! James bond! 007 Gold finger!
As you see baby I am joining the criminal oil cartels loud and clear by chnaging my name from Abol Danesh to Aboil Danesh...
Ahh I love these nice houses with all soft marbles all around it like sweet pussy...
He stood against the oil powers and lost!
by farrad02 on Sun Feb 10, 2008 07:26 PM CSTStatements like that and the creation of OPEC was the begining of the end for his reign!
Disconnected indeed
by Majid on Sun Feb 10, 2008 06:15 PM CSTAnd that was the MOTHER OF ALL MISTAKES !
That was the begining of the end, PERIOD !
Re: fattollah...
by Khasteh (not verified) on Sun Feb 10, 2008 05:28 PM CSTGod bless him. He had his own fair share of mistakes, but his heart was in the right place. May he rest in peace.
Nafti jan and Afsous Khan
by Fatollah (not verified) on Sun Feb 10, 2008 04:03 PM CSTNafti jan, Yoy said it brother! Afsous khan, easeier said than done!
Disconnected from his people
by Afsous (not verified) on Sun Feb 10, 2008 03:40 PM CSTThe problem with the Shah was that he sold himself to the world powers for so many years that he couldn't free himself from their domination easily. The huge petro-dollar fortune of the golden years in the 70's gave him some false confidence to make little noises against the western influence from time to time as seen, for example, in this video clip. At the end, the masters couldn't tolerate such misbehavior from a servant and finally got rid of him. He should have relied on the support of his own people and not the foreigners.
What we had here was the failure to communicate
by Nafti (not verified) on Sun Feb 10, 2008 01:09 PM CSTUnfortunately the regime did not get its own people involved in these issues, consequently they made people ignorant and susceptible to opposition for false promises like "we bring the oil money to your door steps".
Post new comment