A legitimate government is ENTITLED to a monopoly of violence


It is clearly and openly supported by a majority of its subjects and subject to repeated endorsement.  It is democratic in nature.  It respects and protects all unalienable, universal and NATURAL rights–freedom of speech, press, religion, etc.   It protects minorities from the tyranny of the majority and treats them as equals.  It has mechanisms of violence (the military and police) but uses them exclusively to protect the rights mentioned previously.  Private militias representing particular factions have no right to existence because they have no no raison d’etre and because their sole effect is to foment induce internal strife, including atrocities against segments of the population.  


Instead of protecting universal, natural and unalienable rights, illegitimate governments trample them.  Instead of using the police and military to protect rights, it uses them for oppression.  It may also employ vigilantes and death squads for this purpose.


They must obey provided any government that acts legitimately.  No legitimacy = no obligation.  Even then, the people must seek peaceful redress of grievances in lieu of revolution.  Where such efforts are repeatedly spurned and petitioners brutalized, the people have the right of rebellion.  The government loses its “right” to demand a monopoly over violence. 


No.  It closely resembles those in Zimbawe, North Korea and Burma.  In all four, the word “freedom” is a dirty word and to seek it can get you arrested or worse.


“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created EQUAL, that they are endowed by their Creator (NOTE: not Khamenei pr Mesbah Yadzi) with certain unalienable Rights (meaning no one can take them away), that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…

“…to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers FROM THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED (not Khamenei or hardline clerics)

“…whenever any Form of Government (the Islamic Republic) becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it (the right to revolt), and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes (minor disagreements won’t suffice); and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.  But when a long train of abuses and usurpations (as under Khamenei), pursuing invariably the same Object (money and power) evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism (as in Iran today), it is their right, it is their DUTY (get it?), to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

…The history of the present King of…(substitute Iran’s Supreme Leader) is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over (substitute Iran)…

SOURCE: American Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776, paragraph two.

NOTE:  Anything in parentheses is from FG. 

Jefferson is very clear that the “enlightment” ideas he describes apply to all men at all times, not just Americans in specfic conditions on 1776.

Meet Iranian Singles

Iranian Singles

Recipient Of The Serena Shim Award

Serena Shim Award
Meet your Persian Love Today!
Meet your Persian Love Today!