On Saturday a frontpage New York Times article reported:
“The United States and Iran have agreed in principle for the first time to one-on-one negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program, according to Obama administration officials, setting the stage for what could be a last-ditch diplomatic effort to avert a military strike on Iran.”
Few hours later White House denied the report.
The third and final U.S. presidential debate is to take place tonight. The scheduled topic is foreign policy; it is a sure bet the illegal weaponized nuke program of the Messianic Islamist regime ruling over Iran will be on top of the discussion.
On numerous occasions both candidates, President Obama and Mitt Romney, have declared their firm stance against the Messianic terrorists going nuclear.
Meanwhile, the Messianic Islamist terrorists are going full steam ahead with their weaponized nuke program.
To avoid war, given the patently clear unpopularity of the regime with the enslaved Iranians, what is the point beyond which alongside the failed policy of making good with the Messianic Terrorists, supporting regime change by Iranians for Iranians with logistical help from Democracy Central, DC, becomes an actionable option?
