The Nobel laureate, writing in Britain’s Observer, accused the pair of lying about weapons of mass destruction and said the invasion left the world more destabilised and divided “than any other conflict in history”.
Archbishop Emeritus Tutu argued that different standards appeared to apply for prosecuting African leaders than Western counterparts, and added that the death toll during and after the Iraq conflict was sufficient for Blair and Bush to face trial.
“The cost of the decision to rid Iraq of its by-all-accounts despotic and murderous leader has been staggering … More than 110–000 Iraqis have died in the conflict since 2003 and millions have been displaced. By the end of last year, nearly 4–500 American soldiers had been killed and more than 32–000 wounded,” Tutu wrote in the Sunday weekly.
“On these grounds alone, in a consistent world, those responsible for this suffering and loss of life should be treading the same path as some of their African and Asian peers who have been made to answer for their actions in The Hague.”
“But even greater costs have been exacted beyond the killing fields, in the hardened hearts and minds of members of the human family across the world.”
Tutu, a long-standing vocal critic of the Iraq war, also … >>>