New York Post

New York Post September 25, 2012: We’ve got a finger for you, too, Mahmoud! Iranian dictator
Mahmoud  Ahmadinejad spewed garbage in New York yesterday — scoffing that Israel will be
“eliminated,’’ but oddly flashing the peace sign later at the UN >>>
09/25/2012 - 08:24


is this freak supposed to represent iran??

by shushtari on

was the shah so bad?? that the idiots in 79 along with jimmy carter and the rest his moronic advisors decided to bring in a nutcase illiterate akhoond like khomeini to ruin iran?

why didn't they let dr bakhtiar establish a true democracy?

wouldn't iran be in a much better place with a true patriot like dr bakhtiar at it's helm?

just looking at this idiot lying through his nasty grill on CNN is embarassing enough- that a once proud nation has to have a bunch of fat, unshaven morons being it's 'representatives'

what a god""n shame


  Israel will be

by vildemose on


Israel will be "eliminated."

by Iqbal Latif on


In New York, defiant Ahmadinejad says Israel will be "eliminated."

Ahmadinejad threats and 'Mahdaviat'

In 2005, Ahmadinejad calling Israel a "tumour" and constant roaring the words of Ayatollah Khomeini that Israel should be wiped off the map is part of the plan to expedite 'The Dooms day.'The politics of those who believe in the 'Rapture' have a different meaning, when politics is enthused by the will of puritanical extremists to expedite the 'doomsday' the universal collateral damage means nothing. It is one thing to predict 'The Rapture' with no standing armies and quite another when you are on verge of a nuke.

Ahmadinejad's ideology of 'global chaos' is corner stone of Iranian state policy. President Ahmadinejad too is a firm believer in a Shiite version of 'Mahdaviat' like ultra-orthodox Sunni Juhaiman ibn Muhammad ibn Saif al Otaibi did. The case of entering the Holy Mosque in Mecca is originally linked to the expected Mahdi issue. It is argued that "Presidential obsession" with similar 'Mahdaviat' leads Mr. Ahmadinejad to "a conviction that leaves little room for compromise. He thinks that the Mahdi will come in near future as his knight in shining armour? The only missing link that in Presidents opinion delays Mahdi's arrival is that world is still far too peaceful, the degree of clash and disasters that will set the chain of celestial events of 'Mahdaviat' have to gather speed.

They entered the Mosque because they had a scenario for the course of the group, after swearing allegiance to Mohammed Abdullah Al-Mahdi (Muhammad Abdullah Al Qahtani). They adopted the scenario from the apocalyptic books of Dissentions and Signs of Doomsday. This scenario states that “The man swears allegiance at the corner of the Mosque, and this man performs a sit-in there and then an army comes from Tabuk only to be destroyed. Then this man comes out of the Holy Mosque, travels to Medina and fights the Antichrist.” Later on, he leaves Medina and travels to Palestine and fights the Jews there and kills them. Jesus Christ then comes back to break the cross and kill the swine. Afterwards, they will go to Syria and pray at the Umayyad Mosque and then Doomsday will occur. This was the scenario of the group according to the books of Dissentions and Signs of Doomsday.

The 'Iranian mess' is a component of that uncompromising ideological fixation. The altercation with America and Israel and wish to empower Iran with nuclear programs are all designed to lay the foundation for the Mahdi's return." Creation of universal strife and commotion is very much a part of Mahdaviat. Peace and cohabitation in the world means 'Mahdaviat' becomes superfluous. Iranian President is duty bound to help create environ which is conducive to Mahdi return, unfortunately 'universal peace' does not help the prophecies that are integral part of his understanding of the scriptures.

The President does puts his money where his mind is, in 2004, as mayor of Tehran, Mr. Ahmadinejad clandestinely instructed the city council to construct a magnificent boulevard to orchestrate and prepare for the Mahdi arrival, as a President he has allocated $17 million for a blue-tiled mosque closely associated with Mahdaviat in Jamkaran, south of the capital.

Present insanity, psychosis, wars and craftiness in politics of the Middle East has religious historical conjecture; higher the chaos and bigger the noise, the greater the chances of a divine intervention. Very few in the West can understand the undercurrents of self- obliteration so evident in Nasrullah's cult and multitude of suicide bombers. The question is to analyze events in context of the prophecies of 'doom and gloom' for the infidels as firmly believed by the leadership in Iran.



All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


Piece of mind

by trawetsdor on



wonders, Ahmandinejad's antics aside, how many of us would have
really heard it as "goh-khordan" if it was not brought to
our attention in written or spoken words by someone else? When
pre-informed,  one's mind gets quite fixed on the imagined
as much it does on the real. And we still call a man of 14
centuries ago lunatic because he took the imagined as real.

Shazde Asdola Mirza

A piece of Shiite indeed

by Shazde Asdola Mirza on

Many thanks to Ahmaghi-Nezhad, for fully exposing the IRI.

Immortal Guard

One should not touch the sensitivities of the Zio-Nazis!

by Immortal Guard on

Guys please refrain from touching the sensitivities of the Zio-Nazis!


Mehrdad jan, while you're at it, don't forget Kol Nidre.

by Zendanian on


Kol Nidre sung by Perry Como


Dear AI: first of all, happy Yom Kippur….

by Bavafa on

Are you implying that if one does not explicitly condemn every single injustice in the world, then he/she should not take any stance on some of the more gruesome and recent events that is taking place TODAY?  Do you know for a fact that I have not condemn the other injustices by Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, Syria, UAE and America?  

Palestinians crimes against Israeli citizens have been condemned by me in the past and will be so any time they do it, but not when it is against the occupying forces and in the defense/freeing their home land.  Likewise, I will condone any defense by Israelis if/when their country (what is recognized by UN) is invaded or occupied. 

  And you are wrong, I am among very few on IC that regularly and consistently condemn both IRI and Israel for their crimes against humanity, albeit far more IRI than Israel.  In my book and evidence certainly show that hypocrisy is on the account of those who give a pass to one nation/group and condemn another for more or less the same act.


'Hambastegi' is the main key to victory 




by Fesenjoon2 on

Thats the thing, though. If Israel were even to disappear tomorrow, the Islamic nezaam of Iran would find another "DOSHMAN" to villify and rally the muslims against. Israel is just a scapegoat (and a perfect one, because they are Jewish).

Doshman-parvaree is their fu**ing nature. 

They MUST have enemies, otherwise people like me and you will find out what a clusterf**k of a country they have created with their foolish incompetence. 


اما خداییش حال میکنما....!


خود مردتیکش برگشته توی نیویورک به نماینده های مجلس گفته "گه خوردند" که در مورد هیئت 160 نفریش سوال کردند!

اینها از برکات نظام مقدس اسلامه.






by Shepesh on

Even if the Israeli regime was to disappear tomorrow, the other states in the region would still feel threatened by IRI nuclear program and our own Human rights would remain as dismal as ever. 

First Amendment


by First Amendment on

Those who deny the definite difference between antisemitism, and anti Zionism don't know shit............



by Fesenjoon2 on

the answer's easy:

It's because the people who do this, are trying to distract attention away from Iran's acute problems. Otherwise there is NO JUSTFIABLE EXCUSE to focus our attention away from Iran's problems and focus on Israel-Palestine.


  • Are they related to us? No. (theyre Sunnis that dont even revere Hosein and Fatemeh!)
  • Are they our neighbors? No. 2 countries away. 
  • Do we benefit in anyway by siding with anyone in that conflict? No. Our national interests are in the PG and Caspian. Not in Gaza.
  • Is Israel the only state to be unfairly in conflict with some people? Hell no.


So THERE IS NO EXCUSE for Iran involving itself in this business.

Therefore the only excuse left is that those who keep bringing up the "evil Israeli-jew-zio-bahai" shit ARE JUST SIMPLY SUPPORTERS OF THE IRI NEZAAM. Plain and simple. 


Artificial Intelligence

Dear Bavafa

by Artificial Intelligence on

You say:

 "in my book, there is not that much different between a
regime that oppresses its own citizen and a regime that does the same
only to its neighbors.  Thus you see my condemnation of both regimes. "

Really? So if two nations are enemies and kill each others citizens for over 60 years  only the nation that has more killing power (Israel in this instance) should be condemned?  So Palestinians get a pass for all their past killings on innocent people? 

What about Russia killing all those Chechnyans? Have you ever condemned Russia here?

What about the Chinese in Tibet? Do you Condemn China here regularly?

What about Kashmir/India & Pakistan......

What about Sudanese? Syrians......... The list goes on and the Brutality is 100 times worse than the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.....

The list goes on, yet IRI crimes are mentioned and you scream ISRAEL here every day. 

Your comparisons and interjection of Israel into the mix  every time IRI is mentioned is very shaky and sad if you ask me. Please don't stop doing it on my account... Continue doing it. However, know that its full of Hypocrisy because of the mentioned cases above.

I am just giving you my two cents. Please do not be offended. 

Now I have to go and fast 26 hours for Yom Kippur.  I will not be able to respond.....Regards






Why should AN condemn Israel on behalf of Iranians?

by Shepesh on

Why is it any of our business? These condemnations and rhetoric has got us into enough trouble already. And why do some think it should be equal priority, and said in the same breath, to our huge domestic issues? We should be thinking and concerned about IRANIANS. not Arab v "Zionist", the IRI politic.


Vildemose: Agreed and in my

by Bavafa on

Vildemose: Agreed and in my book, there is not that much different between a regime that oppresses its own citizen and a regime that does the same only to its neighbors.  Thus you see my condemnation of both regimes.  

Dr Mohandess:  Fair is fair, exactly my point.   The coverage AN is getting is well deserved and you hardly can interpret my comment as a defense of him, only my criticism of the publication that when it comes to Israel, in my view, it is very one sided.  This is especially sad that they are in a free and open society and will not get the wrath of the justice dept, as it is not the case in Iran, if they were to apply the same standards to ALL.



'Hambastegi' is the main key to victory 




by Fesenjoon2 on

See how easy it is to identify closet islamists? These people are actually defending that monstrosity Ahmadinejad here!

I dont know what more confirmation is needed. 

Dr. Mohandes


by Dr. Mohandes on

Excuse me but in your opinion, what lobby organization(s) runs the iranian newspapers full of constant bullshit and lies and deceitful news and coverage, it is like you are picking up a piece of toilet paper that happens to have something printed on it??? 

Please, I have been dying to hear the truth from someone out there on this and looks like you are that guy or person.

so by all means pal, fire away and educate me. 

Dr. Mohandes

You Want Balanced?

by Dr. Mohandes on

bavafa jan

Fair is fair my man.

There is no room for complaint. he is getting the coverage that he deserves, and what is your beef with that? i just don't understand!

Would you have expressed the same sentiments if it were Hitler doing this?

It is not fair to express such sentiments regarding the media in the states, where they are much more fair and balanced than many others in various countries, despite any shortcomings they most certainly have, but then again so do media in other nations, and to a much wider and extended magnitude.

They tend to give crap to their own leaders and some foreign leaders alike. Can you say that with a straight face when it comes to other publications?

I am sorry, but did you expect to see the red carpet treatment or something? 


Bavafa: There is no

by vildemose on

Bavafa: There is no doubt the Israeli government is an occupying force and it's cruel and brutal to the occupiees (sp?). However, the Israeli government does in no way mistreats its own Israeli citizens in any shape or form  as comprable as to what IRI does to its own citizens.


All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


As would be expected….

by Bavafa on

One could see similar headlines if Netanyahu was going to Tehran to give a speech, same difference.  The only difference is that one would expect a more balanced in the land of free speech as opposed to Tehran where such thing is non-existence.

AN should run in Tel Aviv next election since he can not run in Tehran, he will be a good fit for that system just as well.


'Hambastegi' is the main key to victory 



Jew York Post?

by choghok on

No way Ahmaghinejad is sincere and truthful, but the reason New York Post brought itself to his level is pretty much the Israeli lobby. Ahmaghinejad talk was much softer than previous visits and still this attack happens this year.

Artificial Intelligence

I saw this at the local bage store this morning

by Artificial Intelligence on

As I live in the Tri State area. I started cracking up.  Ahmadinejad is a real piece of gand!

Anonymous Observer

Nicely done!

by Anonymous Observer on


Red Wine


by Red Wine on

ببین چه شده که دیگر صدای یانکی‌ها نیز برآمده است،پس این بِدین معناست که ایشان و طرفدارانَش (نواله خوران،عَر عر زبانان و ضحّاکیان ) مَ.. هستند.

به لغات نامهٔ استاد دهخدا رجوع می‌کنیم :

مدفوع . [ م َ ] (ع ص )رانده شده . (آنندراج ). دفعشده . نعت مفعولی است از دفع. رجوع به دفع شود. || بازایستاده شده . (ناظم الاطباء). رجوع به معنی اول شود. || (اِ) گه . گوه . براز. عذره . پلیدی . ککه . غائط. افکندنی . فضول معده که از مخرج خود برآید. (یادداشت مؤلف ).

این واژه عربی و اسم مفعول است و پارسی آن اینهاست:
وَمیک (وَم = دفع، سنسکریت + پسوند مفعولی یک)
پراسیک (پراس = دفع، سنسکریت + پسوند یک)
ویاژیک (ویاژ= دفع از سنسکریت: ویاس + پسوند یک)
اوژیسیک (اوژیس از سنسکریت: اوچیس= دفع + پسوند یک)
سِپام (اوستایی: سْپامَ)
پَساب (پارسی دری)

با سپاس از همکارانِ عالیقدرْ در روزنامه وزینِ نیویورک پُست.



by Fesenjoon2 on

finally....somenoe has the guts to say like it really is!

They should print one with Khamenei's picture too! 

The Prince

Dang! NY Post....

by The Prince on

beat me to the punch. I was about to write something calling this virus AN, a low life piece of shit, but I guess NY post was quicker! The gull of this garbage, that sat there and never gave one straight answer to any question... Another shameful moment for all Iranianas that this sorry excuse of a creature represents Iran.   


Messianic Islamist warmongers

by Fred on

The Messianic Islamist Rapists, "reformers" and all are warmongers.

The sooner the sane world helps the enslaved Iranians to overthrow this 34 years of nonstop misery, the sooner historic and strategic allies, Iran and Israel, can get back to safeguarding peace and tranquility in the Middle East.