NUCLEAR
All-important question of Iran's ongoing enrichment activities
The newest and much-anticipated International Atomic Energy Agency report on safeguards activities in Iran was sent to the IAEA Member States on February 22, 2008 and almost immediately leaked to the press. As usual, no one was completely satisfied by it but everyone could find in it something that upholds his or her particular point of view. And as usual, the most important part of the report – that dealing with Iran's ongoing uranium enrichment program, with the potential to provide the material for a nuclear explosive device -- was relegated to the end of the report
>>>
2.3 million Americans (1 in 99) currently reside in Federal, State or local prisons in the U.S.
>>>
JANG O JALAL DAR LOS ANGELES
>>>
VIEW
Don’t claim that no one warned you
In eloquent speeches presidential candidate Obama has made copious promises, understandably to attract voters. He talks about “change,” without really spelling out change from what to what. It just sounds good: “change.” A great sound bite, indeed. Change is exciting, while status quo is viewed as stagnant and boring. It is all part of the political game of telling people what they want to hear, getting elected, and worrying about delivering later. The electorates are both short on memory and long on forgiving. So, the farce of empty high-sounding promises fills the air at campaign times. But there are instances that a promise during vote-gathering can later haunt the person
>>>
President Bush made a right decision to respond promptly to Turkey
>>>
بنیادگرایی فرای اینکه خوب است یا بد- که به دیدگاه من بد است- یک پدیده قابل درک اجتماعی است و به میزان رادیکال تر بودن ورود جریان مدرنیته واکنش به آن شدیدتر خواهد بود.
>>>
With Iran strong enough to repulse any invader any future war between iran and America is ours to lose
>>>
Finally I could write something with farsi fonts
>>>
Join the Obama 2008 campaign. See major endorsements
>>>
OBAMA
How far does a candidate have to go to prove his/her loyalty?
Obama was asked two nights ago, in the debate in Ohio, about Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan’s endorsement of his campaign. He replied that he denounced the endorsement. He was then asked if he had rejected it. Obama replied that he doesn’t think there is a difference in the two. Tim Russert kept pushing it, “yeah you denounced it but do you reject it?” Ok, maybe it didn’t happen quite like this, but what the hell? The guy, Farrakhan, is goofy. He’s well on the other end of normalcy, especially when it comes to saying things. But why doesn’t denouncing him and his endorsement enough when it comes to the Jewish community?
>>>
اي عجب با ملت ما هرکسي پاسور زد ------ دست آخر سور زد
بر خلاف حکم بازي، سور خود با زور ------ دست آخر سور زد
>>>