by Balouchi (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 08:02 PM PST
I used to support Ron Paul but with 5% approval rating even Ralph Nader will beat him like a rented mule, I truly do not know which piece of crap in this election will float to the top of the bowl first.
Insaine...Don't Worry ...
by AbolHassan Danesh (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 05:05 PM PST
insaine,
First, I will overule any such law
Second, the islamic Republic is for quite sometimes has been metamorphasized into a bahai Republic...
Third, what do we have for dinner? That is the question!
Fourth, when the republic is going the kick the habit of addiction to black heroin: Oil and Gas revenue.
Fifth, What do we have for lunch?
This will affect Obama, READ OBAMA READ
by insaine (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 04:38 PM PST
DRAFT IRANIAN LAW THREATENS GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
NEW YORK, 22 February 2008 (BWNS) -- The Iranian Parliament is considering
legislation that would institutionalize a series of gross human rights
violations, affecting many even outside of Iran.
Of greatest concern is a section that would mandate the death penalty for anyone
who converts from Islam to another religion, a provision that would affect not
only Baha'is but also Christians, Jews, and others.
The proposed law also would extend the government's reach over alleged security
violations outside the country, give legal effect to discriminatory practices
already in wide use, and redefine a series of
"religious" and other crimes so vaguely as to place in jeopardy virtually any
group facing government disapproval.
"If adopted, the code will permit the government and the clergy to act with
impunity against Iran's citizens on the sole basis of their religious
affiliation,". "This is not only an affront to the people of
Iran; it is an offense to all who seek to uphold fundamental human rights."
The new section on religious conversion -- defined as apostasy --
is especially severe, in that its language mandates the death penalty for anyone
who converts from Islam to another religion and does not immediately recant.
"The text uses the word Hadd, meaning that it explicitly sets death as a fixed
punishment that cannot be changed, reduced or annulled,". "In the
past, the death penalty has been handed down -- and also carried out -- in
apostasy cases, but it has never before been set down in law.
"The law also extends to naming as apostate any follower of a religion other
than Islam who had ONE PARENT who was a Muslim at the time of his or her
conception. Thus, for instance, the CHILD of a Muslim and a Christian who
chooses to adopt the Christian faith would be considered an apostate under the
terms of the law and therefore subject to EXECUTION,".
Another troubling section of the proposed code would extend "security" laws
OUTSIDE OF THE COUNTRY, exposing those outside Iran to the government's reach.
"Iran is apparently not content with targeting those it considers its opponents
only within its borders," THE Article 112 of the
proposed code refers to actions "against the government, the independence and
the internal and external security of the country."
"Since the notion of 'security' is not defined in the law, any action can be
qualified as such,".
The code's vagueness with respect to "offending the sacred" and other crimes
would give the government free license to act against any group it disapproves
of. "The code includes articles that refer to the commission of
unspecified crimes or felonies, as well as articles referring to those guilty of
'corruption and mischief on the earth,'" she said.
"It would also institute capital punishment for anyone who 'INSULTS THE PROPHET,'"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Such provisions place many groups, On extremely vulnerable position, since an 'insult' to the Prophet can be
defined in almost any context, especially where religious belief is concerned."
For the Sake of the Public Safety for the Americans*
by Abol Danesh (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:45 AM PST
...It must become mandatory for the American public know exactly what would be the size and girth of Obama's cock in full erection... the measure must be posted on the ballot both in inch and centemeters for public awareness before casting their ballot....
For you never know what you would be getting without full disclosure....
Hurrrray!....
Religion
by Iva (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 08:02 AM PST
if his father was a moslem then according to islamic laws, he is one too. I hope he has renounced his father's cult and truely believe in secular state.
There is nothing wrong..
by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 07:52 AM PST
Hid father was Muslim and his mom was Christian. There is nothing wrong if he has been exposed to both religions.
islamic schooling
by Iva (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:34 PM PST
I hear Obama had some islamic schooling in his younger days? Has anyone else heard that also?
if that's true that makes him very dangerous man.
RESUME OF BARACK OBAMA-
by Anonymousbama (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 09:29 PM PST
POSITION SOUGHT: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES —————————————————————————————— JOB DESCRIPTION: the successful candidate must have the ability to effectively manage and resolve a wide range of complex problems which significantly affect the welfare of 300 million Americans and billions of human beings in other countries around the world including but not limited to: national security, terrorism, economic recession, Iraq War, spiraling national debt, heath care crisis, shrinking job base, endangered middle class, educational deficit, immigration mess, global warming, loss of international prestige, competition for resources, etc.
It is essential for the candidate to have job related experience for two reasons: i) past experience is the most accurate predictor of future performance, and ii) the nature and urgency of our problems are such that the next president must be capable of addressing them on day 1.
In addition, the candidate must be a strong decisive leader who can provide a new sense of direction and overcome the institutional resistance which exists within the system. This means she or he must have the proper management philosophy, style, message, character, judgment, and moral courage. Why? Because in the immortal words of Harry Truman: “The buck stops here”. —————————————————————————————— QUALIFICATIONS: here are the job related qualifications of Barack Obama, as I perceive them:
PRIOR EXPERIENCE: Freshman Senator (D-Il). Illinois State Legislator, Community Organizer, President of Harvard Law Review. Lived and travelled abroad. Close ties to Daley Machine. He has written two books about his life which have inspired people. No significant legislative accomplishments. He is married, 2 children.
MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY: Insists he is not a Chief Operating Officer. Instead, he believes his role is to set the direction for the country, and hire other people (as yet unidentified) to actually run the government. Yet, the evidence to date from the campaign trail suggests he does not hold subordinates accountable for their actions (i.e. South Carolina campaign staff, Jessie Jackson Jr., General Mc Peak, Axelrod, etc.)
MANAGEMENT STYLE: In public, he favors huge meetings, inspirational speeches, and mass movement politics tilted toward young people and the media. But, behind the scenes he is the exact opposite, i.e. very deferential to powerful interests, and willing to concede a publicly held position as long as he can get a positive headline. Sometimes he gets political contributions too, i.e. Exelon. Uses consultants and lobbyists to steer his campaign and spread false stories about opponents. Plays the race card– offensively and defensively, with plausible deniability.
POLITICAL MESSAGE: Decries the old politics, i.e. clash of interests, baby boomer conflicts, lobbyist control, and claims to offer a new kind of politics, i.e. transcendence, common purpose, rule by the people. But this is an utterly utopian construct. You cannot govern without politics. Our country is too complicated for that. This approach has been tried before by people like Adlai Stevenson, Bill Bradley, Deval Patrick. It leads to political gridlock and nothing gets done.
PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE: He is a narcissistic personality. He preaches themes of empowerment and unity. But when challenged, he becomes very defensive, pouts and tends to demonize opponents, i.e. Wal Mart charge. And when he does not get his way threatens to pick up his marbles and go home, i.e. the veiled threat that he may not support the nominee if it is not him. Finally, his attitude toward women is suspect, i.e. the snub, likeable enough, turning his back, not feeling well, etc.
JUDGMENT: He claims that he is always right on day 1. He cites a speech in Illinois legislature opposing Iraq War as proof–but concedes that he does not know what he would have voted if he had been in the Senate at the time. He dismisses his 17 year political and financial entanglement with an indicted political fixer as a “bone headed mistake”. He leaves hard decisions to others and critiques them later.
MORAL COURAGE: He failed to show up for Kyle Lieberman, but criticized the votes of others who did. He voted “pass” 129 times on various pieces of legislation, on controversial issues. Says he pushed the wrong button six times. When he lost the Nevada primary, he left town without thanking supporters, delivering a concession speech and congratulating his opponent per customary practice. This has caused some to say that he is never there when you need him.
REFERENCES: Oprah, Ted Kennedy, Daley Machine, Rezko, Media Whores, Big Blogs, Limousine Liberals and Political Opportunists who know as well as we do that that he is unqualified for the job but seek to exploit that fact for their own personal gain. ——————————————————————————————– CONCLUSION: if you set aside all the hype about the first black president, and the one-sided media coverage which has defined his candidacy, it is becomes obvious that Barack Obama is not qualified for the job of President of the United States of America.
It is unreasonable to expect that he could deliver the kind of leadership which the country needs at this watershed moment in history. We do not need hope, and utopian rhetoric. We need a realistic vision, moral courage, coalition building, and the adroit use of the levers of power, if we are to succeed and prosper as a nation in the 21st Century.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just NOT Ready
I promise this African guy never get ellected he never get in power if CIA willing to kill hime. USA is country with war and war and war,,,if some one get in power and never get in war where usa are going to sale or test all this gun?
Quote from the old goat Bucanan
by Bored Iranian dude (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 07:32 PM PST
Man
Can
Be given
Any number of human attributes
As a way to recognize him
Such as being
Brave... Honest... Resilient...Beautiful
Etc., Etc. Etc.
But none is as great as
The attribute of "Greatness"
--Hsn Danesh
Persian rug....
by None_of_the_above (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:35 PM PST
Forget about the candidates. None of the above is my choice.
BUT, check out the beautiful Persian rug under their feet.
That is the real thing worth something in this picture.
McCain is the right President America needs at this time of
by American Redneck (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:27 PM PST
uncertainty around the world.
McCain should and will bomb the Islamic Republic for the right reason, to get rid of the Mulllahs and the terrorist IRGCs thugs.
God bless America and McCain.
www.ronpaul2008.com
by Anonymous236 (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:13 PM PST
Correction.
They're all bad candidates.
by Pentako (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:11 PM PST
They're all bad candidates. True change would only come from Mike Gravel or more importantly from Ron Paul, but people are not ready to see that. They think changing the color of the skin of the president or their gender is the change needed to progress into the future. With all the problems America faces (mainly due to its disastrous foreign policy) neither McCain, Hillary, or Obama will bring about change. Just because Obama is young, black, and a "good" vocal orator, doesn't mean he's the right candidate for change. After Bush, anyone looks good, I'll give you that, but real change won't sprout from these candidates. If you really cared, you wouldn't be swayed by their presence and speaking prowess on Tv, but you would do some research on their issues, and sooner than later you would find out how inadequate and disastrous they could be for the America.
Did you know that Hilary and Obama aren't the only democratic candidates running...there's also Mike Gravel, but you never hear anything from this man on Tv, because the media lion doesn't want you to hear what he has to say.
The same with the Republican party. It's only McCain and Huckabee left in the GOP race for presidential primaries, but Ron Paul as well. Fox has banned him, and most media outlets refuse to give him air time. His stances are the best out of anyones, and he is the only candidate to be consistently making money for his campaign every quarter rather than being in debt...like McCain, or accepting money from lobbyist like Hilary.
Time has come to think about your choices, not be spoon fed like you always are.
by Anonymous666 (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:09 PM PST
Dead wrong buddy. Obama is the one. You don't believe me, I'll chat with you after November. Just don't say "that was a lucky guess".
Obama is the strongest candidate
by Al Sefati (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:08 PM PST
The guy can talk, he has strong character, he is not too much to the left or too much to the right, he does not have the baggage of either Clinton or McCain, he is simply the strongest candidate.
McCain and whoever his running mate is gonna be easy as like eating chocolate cake for Obama.
And Clinton's days are numbered, I really doubt he can get both Ohio and Texas!
Re: nice
by rose (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 05:49 PM PST
Hillary not taking order from anyone? You must be kidding! She has already been sold to the Jewish lobby long time ago.
Obama or Hillary..which one is a better puppet
by nice (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 04:59 PM PST
Believe it or not, past 4 years, white interest groups were building Obama.
Do you remember between all Democrats who were the speaker in presidential election 4 years age? OBAMA. You know what... he is a puppet that white interest groups will play with him very well, that is why so much investment is on him (donations).
On the other hand Hillary is an established, stubborn, and strong lady that is not taking order form anybody so she is going down...
They first outline their 4-8 yeras foreign policy and then come up with someone (future president) thats fits the profile. It's very likely McCain wins, why? because in they 8 year term the neocons didn't have enough time to 'do' Iran. They got entangled in Iraq, threfore they decided they need another 4 years and for that along with the neocon democrats (they exist) they came up with this plan. A woman a black and McCain. Who will win? Mccain and definitely not Obama.
Obama doesn't stand a chance of becoming president. They won't let him. The white America is not ready for this to happen. The whole thing is just a show to tell everyone around the world they're actually a real democracy (non-racist democracy)
I used to support Ron Paul
by Balouchi (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 08:02 PM PSTI used to support Ron Paul but with 5% approval rating even Ralph Nader will beat him like a rented mule, I truly do not know which piece of crap in this election will float to the top of the bowl first.
Insaine...Don't Worry ...
by AbolHassan Danesh (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 05:05 PM PSTinsaine,
First, I will overule any such law
Second, the islamic Republic is for quite sometimes has been metamorphasized into a bahai Republic...
Third, what do we have for dinner? That is the question!
Fourth, when the republic is going the kick the habit of addiction to black heroin: Oil and Gas revenue.
Fifth, What do we have for lunch?
This will affect Obama, READ OBAMA READ
by insaine (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 04:38 PM PSTDRAFT IRANIAN LAW THREATENS GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
NEW YORK, 22 February 2008 (BWNS) -- The Iranian Parliament is considering
legislation that would institutionalize a series of gross human rights
violations, affecting many even outside of Iran.
Of greatest concern is a section that would mandate the death penalty for anyone
who converts from Islam to another religion, a provision that would affect not
only Baha'is but also Christians, Jews, and others.
The proposed law also would extend the government's reach over alleged security
violations outside the country, give legal effect to discriminatory practices
already in wide use, and redefine a series of
"religious" and other crimes so vaguely as to place in jeopardy virtually any
group facing government disapproval.
"If adopted, the code will permit the government and the clergy to act with
impunity against Iran's citizens on the sole basis of their religious
affiliation,". "This is not only an affront to the people of
Iran; it is an offense to all who seek to uphold fundamental human rights."
The new section on religious conversion -- defined as apostasy --
is especially severe, in that its language mandates the death penalty for anyone
who converts from Islam to another religion and does not immediately recant.
"The text uses the word Hadd, meaning that it explicitly sets death as a fixed
punishment that cannot be changed, reduced or annulled,". "In the
past, the death penalty has been handed down -- and also carried out -- in
apostasy cases, but it has never before been set down in law.
"The law also extends to naming as apostate any follower of a religion other
than Islam who had ONE PARENT who was a Muslim at the time of his or her
conception. Thus, for instance, the CHILD of a Muslim and a Christian who
chooses to adopt the Christian faith would be considered an apostate under the
terms of the law and therefore subject to EXECUTION,".
Another troubling section of the proposed code would extend "security" laws
OUTSIDE OF THE COUNTRY, exposing those outside Iran to the government's reach.
"Iran is apparently not content with targeting those it considers its opponents
only within its borders," THE Article 112 of the
proposed code refers to actions "against the government, the independence and
the internal and external security of the country."
"Since the notion of 'security' is not defined in the law, any action can be
qualified as such,".
The code's vagueness with respect to "offending the sacred" and other crimes
would give the government free license to act against any group it disapproves
of. "The code includes articles that refer to the commission of
unspecified crimes or felonies, as well as articles referring to those guilty of
'corruption and mischief on the earth,'" she said.
"It would also institute capital punishment for anyone who 'INSULTS THE PROPHET,'"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Such provisions place many groups, On extremely vulnerable position, since an 'insult' to the Prophet can be
defined in almost any context, especially where religious belief is concerned."
For the Sake of the Public Safety for the Americans*
by Abol Danesh (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:45 AM PST...It must become mandatory for the American public know exactly what would be the size and girth of Obama's cock in full erection... the measure must be posted on the ballot both in inch and centemeters for public awareness before casting their ballot....
For you never know what you would be getting without full disclosure....
Hurrrray!....
Religion
by Iva (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 08:02 AM PSTif his father was a moslem then according to islamic laws, he is one too. I hope he has renounced his father's cult and truely believe in secular state.
There is nothing wrong..
by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun Feb 24, 2008 07:52 AM PSTHid father was Muslim and his mom was Christian. There is nothing wrong if he has been exposed to both religions.
islamic schooling
by Iva (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:34 PM PSTI hear Obama had some islamic schooling in his younger days? Has anyone else heard that also?
if that's true that makes him very dangerous man.
RESUME OF BARACK OBAMA-
by Anonymousbama (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 09:29 PM PSTPOSITION SOUGHT: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES —————————————————————————————— JOB DESCRIPTION: the successful candidate must have the ability to effectively manage and resolve a wide range of complex problems which significantly affect the welfare of 300 million Americans and billions of human beings in other countries around the world including but not limited to: national security, terrorism, economic recession, Iraq War, spiraling national debt, heath care crisis, shrinking job base, endangered middle class, educational deficit, immigration mess, global warming, loss of international prestige, competition for resources, etc.
It is essential for the candidate to have job related experience for two reasons: i) past experience is the most accurate predictor of future performance, and ii) the nature and urgency of our problems are such that the next president must be capable of addressing them on day 1.
In addition, the candidate must be a strong decisive leader who can provide a new sense of direction and overcome the institutional resistance which exists within the system. This means she or he must have the proper management philosophy, style, message, character, judgment, and moral courage. Why? Because in the immortal words of Harry Truman: “The buck stops here”. —————————————————————————————— QUALIFICATIONS: here are the job related qualifications of Barack Obama, as I perceive them:
PRIOR EXPERIENCE: Freshman Senator (D-Il). Illinois State Legislator, Community Organizer, President of Harvard Law Review. Lived and travelled abroad. Close ties to Daley Machine. He has written two books about his life which have inspired people. No significant legislative accomplishments. He is married, 2 children.
MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY: Insists he is not a Chief Operating Officer. Instead, he believes his role is to set the direction for the country, and hire other people (as yet unidentified) to actually run the government. Yet, the evidence to date from the campaign trail suggests he does not hold subordinates accountable for their actions (i.e. South Carolina campaign staff, Jessie Jackson Jr., General Mc Peak, Axelrod, etc.)
MANAGEMENT STYLE: In public, he favors huge meetings, inspirational speeches, and mass movement politics tilted toward young people and the media. But, behind the scenes he is the exact opposite, i.e. very deferential to powerful interests, and willing to concede a publicly held position as long as he can get a positive headline. Sometimes he gets political contributions too, i.e. Exelon. Uses consultants and lobbyists to steer his campaign and spread false stories about opponents. Plays the race card– offensively and defensively, with plausible deniability.
POLITICAL MESSAGE: Decries the old politics, i.e. clash of interests, baby boomer conflicts, lobbyist control, and claims to offer a new kind of politics, i.e. transcendence, common purpose, rule by the people. But this is an utterly utopian construct. You cannot govern without politics. Our country is too complicated for that. This approach has been tried before by people like Adlai Stevenson, Bill Bradley, Deval Patrick. It leads to political gridlock and nothing gets done.
PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE: He is a narcissistic personality. He preaches themes of empowerment and unity. But when challenged, he becomes very defensive, pouts and tends to demonize opponents, i.e. Wal Mart charge. And when he does not get his way threatens to pick up his marbles and go home, i.e. the veiled threat that he may not support the nominee if it is not him. Finally, his attitude toward women is suspect, i.e. the snub, likeable enough, turning his back, not feeling well, etc.
JUDGMENT: He claims that he is always right on day 1. He cites a speech in Illinois legislature opposing Iraq War as proof–but concedes that he does not know what he would have voted if he had been in the Senate at the time. He dismisses his 17 year political and financial entanglement with an indicted political fixer as a “bone headed mistake”. He leaves hard decisions to others and critiques them later.
MORAL COURAGE: He failed to show up for Kyle Lieberman, but criticized the votes of others who did. He voted “pass” 129 times on various pieces of legislation, on controversial issues. Says he pushed the wrong button six times. When he lost the Nevada primary, he left town without thanking supporters, delivering a concession speech and congratulating his opponent per customary practice. This has caused some to say that he is never there when you need him.
REFERENCES: Oprah, Ted Kennedy, Daley Machine, Rezko, Media Whores, Big Blogs, Limousine Liberals and Political Opportunists who know as well as we do that that he is unqualified for the job but seek to exploit that fact for their own personal gain. ——————————————————————————————– CONCLUSION: if you set aside all the hype about the first black president, and the one-sided media coverage which has defined his candidacy, it is becomes obvious that Barack Obama is not qualified for the job of President of the United States of America.
It is unreasonable to expect that he could deliver the kind of leadership which the country needs at this watershed moment in history. We do not need hope, and utopian rhetoric. We need a realistic vision, moral courage, coalition building, and the adroit use of the levers of power, if we are to succeed and prosper as a nation in the 21st Century.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just NOT Ready
they never let a African get in power in USA
by hajiagha on Sat Feb 23, 2008 08:52 PM PST//hajiagha.tripod.com
I promise this African guy never get ellected he never get in power if CIA willing to kill hime. USA is country with war and war and war,,,if some one get in power and never get in war where usa are going to sale or test all this gun?
Quote from the old goat Bucanan
by Bored Iranian dude (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 07:32 PM PST"McCain will make Cheney look like Ghandi"
*
by Danesh, Abol Hassan, 1952- (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 07:24 PM PST++++++++
++++
+++
++
+
I Am Great
Man
Can
Be given
Any number of human attributes
As a way to recognize him
Such as being
Brave... Honest... Resilient...Beautiful
Etc., Etc. Etc.
But none is as great as
The attribute of "Greatness"
--Hsn Danesh
Persian rug....
by None_of_the_above (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:35 PM PSTForget about the candidates. None of the above is my choice.
BUT, check out the beautiful Persian rug under their feet.
That is the real thing worth something in this picture.
McCain is the right President America needs at this time of
by American Redneck (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:27 PM PSTuncertainty around the world.
McCain should and will bomb the Islamic Republic for the right reason, to get rid of the Mulllahs and the terrorist IRGCs thugs.
God bless America and McCain.
www.ronpaul2008.com
by Anonymous236 (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:13 PM PSTCorrection.
They're all bad candidates.
by Pentako (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:11 PM PSTThey're all bad candidates. True change would only come from Mike Gravel or more importantly from Ron Paul, but people are not ready to see that. They think changing the color of the skin of the president or their gender is the change needed to progress into the future. With all the problems America faces (mainly due to its disastrous foreign policy) neither McCain, Hillary, or Obama will bring about change. Just because Obama is young, black, and a "good" vocal orator, doesn't mean he's the right candidate for change. After Bush, anyone looks good, I'll give you that, but real change won't sprout from these candidates. If you really cared, you wouldn't be swayed by their presence and speaking prowess on Tv, but you would do some research on their issues, and sooner than later you would find out how inadequate and disastrous they could be for the America.
Did you know that Hilary and Obama aren't the only democratic candidates running...there's also Mike Gravel, but you never hear anything from this man on Tv, because the media lion doesn't want you to hear what he has to say.
The same with the Republican party. It's only McCain and Huckabee left in the GOP race for presidential primaries, but Ron Paul as well. Fox has banned him, and most media outlets refuse to give him air time. His stances are the best out of anyones, and he is the only candidate to be consistently making money for his campaign every quarter rather than being in debt...like McCain, or accepting money from lobbyist like Hilary.
Time has come to think about your choices, not be spoon fed like you always are.
www.ronpaul20008.com
kamangir you are
by Anonymous666 (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:09 PM PSTDead wrong buddy. Obama is the one. You don't believe me, I'll chat with you after November. Just don't say "that was a lucky guess".
Obama is the strongest candidate
by Al Sefati (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 06:08 PM PSTThe guy can talk, he has strong character, he is not too much to the left or too much to the right, he does not have the baggage of either Clinton or McCain, he is simply the strongest candidate.
McCain and whoever his running mate is gonna be easy as like eating chocolate cake for Obama.
And Clinton's days are numbered, I really doubt he can get both Ohio and Texas!
Re: nice
by rose (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 05:49 PM PSTHillary not taking order from anyone? You must be kidding! She has already been sold to the Jewish lobby long time ago.
Obama or Hillary..which one is a better puppet
by nice (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 04:59 PM PSTBelieve it or not, past 4 years, white interest groups were building Obama.
Do you remember between all Democrats who were the speaker in presidential election 4 years age? OBAMA. You know what... he is a puppet that white interest groups will play with him very well, that is why so much investment is on him (donations).
On the other hand Hillary is an established, stubborn, and strong lady that is not taking order form anybody so she is going down...
Daryush
by Kamangir on Sat Feb 23, 2008 04:47 PM PSTThey first outline their 4-8 yeras foreign policy and then come up with someone (future president) thats fits the profile. It's very likely McCain wins, why? because in they 8 year term the neocons didn't have enough time to 'do' Iran. They got entangled in Iraq, threfore they decided they need another 4 years and for that along with the neocon democrats (they exist) they came up with this plan. A woman a black and McCain. Who will win? Mccain and definitely not Obama.
Kamangir
McCain is a "FASCIST"!
by Nader on Sat Feb 23, 2008 04:29 PM PSTHe'll be worst then Bush Junior!
A war monger indeed!
No way
by Nemat (not verified) on Sat Feb 23, 2008 04:07 PM PSTWhite America will not allow Obama outside the white house, never mind inside.
Kamangir
by Daryush on Sat Feb 23, 2008 03:58 PM PSTDon't under estimate the power of hope!
Doesn't stand a chance
by Kamangir on Sat Feb 23, 2008 03:51 PM PSTObama doesn't stand a chance of becoming president. They won't let him. The white America is not ready for this to happen. The whole thing is just a show to tell everyone around the world they're actually a real democracy (non-racist democracy)
Kamangir