Preliminary Analysis of the Voting Figures in Iran's 2009 Presidential Elections
Chatham House / Ali Ansari
25-Jun-2009 (one comment)

Executive Summary: Working from the province by province breakdowns of the 2009 and 2005 results, released by the Iranian Ministry of Interior on the Farsi pages of their website shortly after the election, and from the 2006 census as published by the official Statistical Centre of Iran, the following observations about the official data and the debates surrounding it can be made.

·In two conservative provinces, Mazandaran and Yazd, a turnout of more than 100% was recorded.

·If Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's victory was primarily caused by the increase in voter turnout, one would expect the data to show that the provinces with the greatest increase in voter turnout would also show the greatest 'swing' in support towards Ahmadinejad. This is not the case.

·In a third of all provinces, the official results would require that Ahmadinejad took not only all former conservative voters, all former centrist voters, and all new voters, but also up to 44% of former reformist voters, despite a decade of conflict between these two groups.

·In 2005, as in 2001 and 1997, conservative candidates, and Ahmadinejad in particular, were markedly unpopular in rural areas. That the countryside always votes conservative is a myth. The claim that this year Ahmadinejad swept the board in more rural provinces flies in the face of these trends.

>>>
alexarjomand

Preliminary Analysis of the Voting Figures in iran

by alexarjomand on

An excellent analysis of the results of the elections in Iran.  Ansari makes the case that the suggested outcome was highly unlikely.



Share/Save/Bookmark