Thursday
June 21, 2001
No center
Why with most of us things have to be all the way to the right or far
to the left? Consider how we evaluate the previous regime; we often hear
two totally different views. Some find nothing nice to say about that time
while others think the Shah's regime was the best thing ever happened to
the human race. We have the same sort of categorization and absolute view
about Iran-US relations, religions, the current regime in Iran, the opposition,
and most every other political, social and cultural issues that we talk
about, regardless of the depth of our knowledge about the subject.
"Ya Roomi-e Room, Ya Zangi-e Zang" is how things have to be
with us. That may be one of the reasons we keep missing the boat. Not knowing
exactly how things are, makes it difficult, if not impossible, to correct
the mistakes and to work for a better future. We need to realize that the
real world is not all black and white, and reorganize that it is more flexible
than we are used to. We need to look at things from different angles and
find out what part of it works for us and what need change. To see a better
Iran and better Irani, tomorrow, we must learn a better way of looking.
One side effect of the Absolute Vision is trying, or rather forcing, to
make connection between issues that really have nothing or very little
to do with each other. This, I see a lot of. Just read the "Letters"
section of the Iranian.com once in a while to see how simple things change
to blockbuster social issues or future forming political revolutions. Some
example:
1- Googoosh's concert. A widely popular singer, who due to the revolution
in Iran and like many other male and female artists could not perform,
comes out of the country for a concert tour. Her motivations for doing
so, most probably, were to feel better about herself by perform again after
twenty some years of silence, and make money. But it couldn't be that simple
for us. There we tons of articles analyzing everything that is and was
about her, and from those, all sorts of accusations and blames were built
up against her, the Islamic Republic, the Shah's regime and so on. Of course
there were many who voiced the opposing views. If we were to draw so many
serious conclusions from a pop concert, aren't we missing the serious
points?
2- Someone likes to write a series of erotic
short stories. Iranian.com, for reasons known to its editor, decide
to publish it. At this point, for the most part, it's a matter of the taste
and quality of these writings in one hand, and the readers' judgment of
Iranian.com in publishing it, on the other hand. But this matter, like
most anything else becomes a hot issue so nothing else is safe from criticism.
And not surprisingly it follows all sorts of praises and admiration for
the writer and the "Literature." Too much, too far from either
side.
3- The last example and the main reason for writing this article:
Death of Leila Pahlavi. A young woman has died. Regardless of who she was
and how she died, it's a tragedy for her family and friends. That simple.
If you haven't already, read some of the comments about this issue. I see
no need to reflect every point of view in this matter; there are some (now
that we find out who she was, and dead) who think of her like Diana [""Diana
not""]. Some don't. Some find this a good subject to attack
the previous regime, Reza Pahlavi, current regime, and etc. The issue of
why Shah left and the Ayatollah came, what we had or hadn't, what is or
isn't have not really anything to do with Leila Pahlavi, at least not with
her death. Let's not mix things up. We need better way of answering all
these questions. Better yet, find some new questions. Work on a way out
to the future.
It's great to talk about the things that are important to us, especially
about the things that effects us all, like the politics, politicians, social
and cultural issues, and so on. But all these talks mean nothing if they
aren't to change us for better. We have to see things for what they are,
and make connections where it makes sense and come to conclusions when
they are reasonable.
Ray Irani
|
|
|