The ugly truth
If the people
who stayed home had voted, this Ahmadinejad guy would have never
been elected
June 28, 2005
iranian.com
All the way to school Saturday -- the day after the
electiuon -- I was trying to come up with ugly world leaders. Presidents,
prime ministers,
kings,
queens, it
really didn't matter. Just somebody a bit too grotesque
to be featured as front page news on state visits. I think: "Yasser
Arafat looked like a lizard ... Jean Chretien
of Canada, there's a guy with
a really ugly lower lip.
Or how about Margaret Thatcher?" But
I know even a remote comparison would be insane. Sure, she was
no super model, but they don't call her the Iron Lady for nothing.
There is a strong sense of strength that sieves through, even
from looking at her photos. No, as hard as I
push my brain, I really can't come up with any leader
as un-photogenic as my president-elect.
Today the whole school was
in a frenzy. Students were evidently scared and shaken. Walking
to lunch with my friends, all we did
was remind
each other that in only a month or two we'd have
to walk on two separate sides of the street. Everyone is talking
about obtaining American visas and enrolling in schools abroad.
The girls are asking each other where they can find loose,
long
manteaus that will have to replace the colorful tight ones they
have now.
I don't know how this could have happened. Sure,
there are those who claim nothing has changed and
nothing
will because someone else is in charge. But living here in Tehran
on a daily basis, I know that is far from the truth. I look at
the girls with their
colorful shawls and makeup.
Will they be thrown in the closet come August 24th when Ahmadinejad
begins his term in office? Will I see
the existing few worthy publications banned? And how will I bear
watching the news to see such an uncomely
looking man representing me in all international forums?
My friends, who
all voted for Rafsanjani, didn't expect this outcome at all. I
remember Rafsanjani being bashed four years ago when reformists
held the
presidency
and enjoyed
parliamentary majority. But this is politics, not a sibling rivalry.
Everything is relative and alliances change based on current issues.
These are politicians who work from within the system. This time
the reformists needed
Rafsanjani. But it was too late.
A lot of the people refused to vote, especially
the younger generation who have little memory of
the Rafsanjani
era but grew up reading all the books and articles critical of
his abuse of power and financial corruption. His riches don't really
bother me. It's his denials.
Lebanon late Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri
was much loved
amongst his people; even though his multi-billionaire dollar
empire was known to all. By contrast, Rafsanjani's sons have
been taking care of family business and managing real estate all
around
the world; it's common knowledge. Yet he goes on claiming
that he's virtually dirt poor.
There were some decent
people in the list of presidential candidates. Sure, they were
not saints, but that should not have been an excuse to sit back
in a city of 12 million and let a few hundred thousand people elect
the sinners. If the people
who stayed home had voted, this Ahmadinejad guy would have never
become mayor and the park down my street
would not have turned into a martyrs' cemetery;
and the farhangsara cultural center two
blocks away would
not have become an Islamic center overnight.
Half the population of Tehran went to sleep last
night not knowing what hit them. The
other half, like my school janitor who was victoriously offering
sweets the morning after the election, dreams of the riches
Ahmadinejad has promised. Who
knows? Maybe the poor are giving the IRI another chance
to deliver. But my guess is that it's too
late.
|