September 20-24, 1999 / Shahrivar 29-2 Mehr, 1378
- Don't take it personally
- Deep down: Neanderthals
- Head spinner
- Genuine debate
- New Dark Ages
- I am shocked!
September 24, 1999
Yet another typical article regurgitating the same old tired leftist
rhetoric about gay rights ["Acceptance"].
In this and in all the other cases, it is never quite clear what exactly
the author WANTS from the Iranian community at large. He rails against
this so-called "homophobia" and heterosexism among Iranians but
on the other hand he never defines exactly what "homophobia"
refers to, and what Iranians should do instead.
I mean, what IS homophobia anyway? Does it refer to gay bashing and
violence towards gays and lesbians? If so then Iranians are definitely
not guilty of this. Does it refer to a general aversion to the idea of
gay sex? Well, that is of course natural when one is heterosexual, just
like the idea of sex with animals is repulsive to the average heterosexual.
Or is homophobia a label placed on people who do not wish to march down
the street in "gay pride" parades and who have no desire to be
activists for this issue? If that's the case, the by all means yes, Iranians
are homophobic. But I don't see anything wrong with that.
The point is, I don't think the average Iranian cares greatly about
the issue. I think they are satisfied that what people do in private
is just that -- private. And it should be kept so. Just like what heterosexuals
do in private is a private matter. Beyond that, there should be no problem.
But of course there still is a problem according to gay rights activists
like this author, who want to force their ideologies onto everyone else.
This borders on fascism. There is absolutely NO reason why Iranians should
"support the lifestyle" of Iranian gays and lesbians (as a corollary
they shouldn't preach to them either). The very idea is inane and ridiculous.
Go to top
* Don't take it personally
Why can't some poor slob ever write a story, an item, an article that
is a "sharhe haal" without getting shafted by the readers of
this web site? I don't get it. Okay, so all you people who disagree
with Alemi's "I
was once an Iranian", disagree with him. I don't see the guy telling
you that YOU TOO, god forbid, have "sold out."
Who's threatening the lot of you or telling you to be un-Iranian?
Can't anyone take it NOT PERSONALLY? He's describing HIS feelings about
HIS life and times. Why does everything ALWAYS have to be about EVERYONE.
Why do we all think that things are either black or white? Isn't there
a happy medium, a gray area, a balance to strike in this life? Our culture
centricity will be our ultimate downfall...mark my words.
Go to top
September 23, 1999
* Derrida wannabe
We have another Derrida wannabe [Sohrab Mahdavi in "Lamentations
of Laleh Khalili"] who has decided to write by way of aphorisms
... And he is arrogant enough to construct every sentence as if it were
truth as opposed to mere conjectures on his parts...
It is ... the habit of every new generation to call the fight against
or for modernity its own (Gandhi seems ancient history now, doesn't he?).
Let's have a little more respect for history and not force it down every
little intellectual canal we find lying around ... FULL
Go to top
The article "Lamentations
of Laleh Khalili" is mortifying because it strives to be so. It
perpetuates itself through gyrations from "Messianic" time to
Modern, from identity to an identity-in-absence. It is very much emblematic
of the writer's desire to conquer both worlds in a single sweep, to go
beyond "both" and "with" at once. In fact, Mahdavi
thinks himself post-everything, nationalism, modernism, tradition, capitalism,
Print, King ...
There is no need for high-flown language whose sole aim is to expose
foundations, only to surpass itself in the act of doing so. This is a small
community. Even if there are those who appreciate the tone and language,
the majority doesn't get beyond so much as the first few lines of Mahdavi's
verbiage. Lets forget who we are or who we have been, as Mahdavi would
have us, but let us not forget how little we are. Man has left the realm
of gods to gods, but he still finds himself subject to a predicament that
can, and all-too-often-does, inspire him with awe ... FULL
Go to top
September 22, 1999
* I am shocked!
I think Mr.
Salaradini is a bit unkind to Mr. Alami ["I
was once an Iranian"] ; I can't see Mr. Alami toasting the Queen
anytime soon, nor do I see self-hatred as Mr. Alardini has implicitly suggested.
I do agree that some of Alami's remarks are naïve and inaccurate...
Example of mishmash: To call into question literary exploration of the
Iranian literary cannon as evidence of some kind of reactionary tendency.
I am shocked! An educated person such as Mr. Alami is surly aware of mountains
of work annually amassed on such medieval stalwarts as Chaucer, Boccacio,
Marlow and so forth. Entire cultural industries are erected in Western
universities around obscure literary figures in Twelfth century Wales.
So what is then Mr. Alami that is wrong with study of Hafez? ... FULL TEXT
Go to top
* Deep down: Neanderthals
This is an old article ["Real
Iranian girls?"]. I found it just as repulsive then as I find
it now. It saddens me that it is being re-circulated again. It makes me
wonder that no matter how sophisticated, or intellectual some of us pretend
to be, deep down we are just the bigoted, sexiest, Neanderthals which our
sick backward religious or otherwise beliefs have so well created ... FULL TEXT
Go to top
September 21, 1999
* Genuine debate
After reading Mr.
Tavakoli's letter about the treatment of homosexuals in Iran, I felt
so sad being an Iranian. How can this government of so-called holy men
be so cruel upon our people? : - (
I think the issue of Iranian gays and lesbians most definitely is one
that will grow. This is mainly due to the openness of the cultures where
the Iranian diaspora live. In addition, the increasing mass-popularity
and availability of the internet has opened up many possibilities among
all people, even within Iran.
Gay and lesbian Iranians living in Iran now, are starting to realize
that they are not alone and so-called freaks of nature and that there is
a whole world of people like themselves. This was not possible a few years
I think that a genuine debate on this issue is needed especially since
many Iranians think they are progressive and open-minded until they are
faced with gay and lesbian issues.
I have many gay and lesbian friends, and they are great people who have
done no harm to anyone. Most of them tell me that they did not choose their
homosexuality. In the face of such hatred and cruelty, why would they?
Go to top
* Head spinner
My head is spinning. I just got done reading another one of Laleh Khalili's
rambling reviews; her ostensible critique of fast paced modernization in
her article "New
is good". Wieuuuuh!
What is it about her writing? Reading it has the same effect as popping
high-powered speed pills. No introduction. No main theme or body. No conclusion.
Just an endless, rapid fired, breakneck speed stream of harsh, ideologically
laced opinions and observations. Like a diesel locomotive raging ahead
with no breaks.
And to what end this stringing together of multisylabic sixteen inch
words? Hard to say! But then again, modern writing is often characterized
by its schizophrenic qualities!
Go to top
September 20, 1999
* New Dark Ages
This is a letter in response to YekIrani's recent article "Acceptance".
Same-sex relationships are currently outlawed in 26 Islamic countries...
Of the Islamic states that ban lesbian and gay sex, Iran is the most zealously
homophobic. Since 1980, when the fundamentalists came to power under the
leadership of Ayatollah Khomeini, over 4,000 lesbians and gay men have
been executed, according to estimates by the exiled Iranian
homosexual rights group, Homan.... FULL
Go to top
Copyright © Abadan Publishing Co. All Rights Reserved.
May not be duplicated or distributed in any form