Tomorrow, the five members of the UN Security Council plus Germany (known as the P5+1), will sit down with Iran in the latest attempt to ease increasing global anxiety over the country's nuclear programme. The threat of new sanctions hangs in the air. We have been here before: deadline after deadline, sanction after sanction, we return to the same old dance, the only real difference being that the Islamic Republic is inching ever closer to the Bomb. So perhaps now is the time to try something new. In anticipation of the October 1 meeting, the P5+1 must embrace their greatest ally in the war on nuclear proliferation: the people of Iran.
Until now, the Islamic Republic has not responded to external pressure from the international community. No amount of sanctions has worked. Instead, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad soaks up every opportunity to perform on the world stage, entertaining his audience of cool and collected clerics. But those clerics were not so composed on that June day when hundreds of thousands of Iranian people poured on to the streets, demanding an end to fundamentalist tyranny and the regime's oppression of their human rights.
In stark contrast to its reaction to international pressure, the regime's response to the internal uprising was immediate. Quivering with fear, it instantly detained more than 4,000 of its own people, suffocating their roaring cries for freedom and democracy. Students and journalists, sons, daughters, mothers and fathers, young and old are still being held, clubbed, raped and tortured by the Islamic clerical regime. Hundreds of others stand falsely accused, helplessly awaiting trial without rights or representation.
Human Rights Watch and the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran urged the UN to appoint a special human rights envoy during last week's meeting of the General Assembly to investigate the Iranian government's egregious record of abuse. And still, suffering under a brutal regime that threatens their very right to life, the Iranian people continue to plead for their liberties, fight for their freedoms and scream for the world's support.
The clerics' fearful and nervous response to the people's uprising demonstrated that the biggest threat to their survival in power comes from within their own borders. Contrary to the state-run press and propaganda, the regime's biggest enemy is not the West; it is its own people.
By supporting the Iranian people and their struggle for human rights, by elevating the importance of their liberties, the West will find its greatest ally on the nuclear issue. Empowering the opposition movement will encourage and prolong internal dissent, and sustaining that internal unrest is the key to cracking the clerical code.
While sanctions can in fact prove to be a useful tool in the shed of diplomacy, they result in the suffering of a nation's citizens, victimising the innocent many for the sins of the stubborn few. For sanctions to truly be effective in Iran, human rights have to be put on equal footing with the nuclear concern. Many of my Iranian compatriots have indicated to me that they would be willing to add to their hardships in the short term only if they believe that sanctions will curtail the lifespan of clerical oppression and cure their want of human rights.
In 1986, the United States led a worldwide campaign for human rights and equality in South Africa when it passed the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act, banning US investment in the country. Disinvestment sanctions were about civil rights and human rights, and other world powers quickly followed suit. Most importantly, the removal of apartheid laws and the release of political prisoners were necessary preconditions to the lifting of sanctions. Those sanctions worked. The South African people suffered a deep recession in the short term, but to this day, no South African has forgotten the importance of those preconditions and the long-term liberation they brought to them as a people.
In the case of Iran, US foreign policy and international pressure are reaching their limit. External sanctions that are imposed solely to shape Iran's nuclear policy are unlikely to ever decrease the number of centrifuges that enrich uranium. Furthermore, if the issue of enrichment continues to trump the moral fight for the most basic human liberties – namely the right to free and fair elections and the freedom of speech – then the P5+1 will be seen to have abandoned the Iranian people to their plight. Alternatively, if the West enforces new sanctions that are intrinsically tied to the national outcry for freedom, they have armed their greatest ally with the powerful weapon of international solidarity in the struggle against the Islamic regime. This uprising can change the entire fabric of stability in the Middle East.
So, while the world toils over yellowcake, the people of Iran still believe in their green movement for freedom, hope and human rights. It is time for international leaders to stand behind the human rights of the Iranian people. In so doing, they will entrust the Iranian people with the power to resolve the nuclear issue.
AUTHOR
Reza Pahlavi is former Crown Prince of Iran. This commentary was first published in the London Telegraph.
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Royal Concern
by میرزا چغندر on Wed Sep 30, 2009 04:14 PM PDTای بابا، مگه عکس بهتری از این آقازاده نداشتین که اینو گذاشتین ،انگار خدای نکرده میخواد بپره رو دوربین. اتفاقاً چیزی که ایشون کم نداره همون عکسه که توی این سی سال گذشته توی مراسم مختلف اینور و اونور دنیا گرفته.از عروسی سلطنتی اسپانیا گرفته تا چه میدونم ختنه سورون نوه عمو کسینجرش. که اگه به جای اینکارهای جلف نشسته بود و یک کم فکرهاشو به کار مینداخت میتونست بعد از سی سال بشه رهبر طرفدارهای سلطنت ونه یک سخنگوی دروغگوی بی خاصیت.
You make several good point
by oktaby on Wed Sep 30, 2009 06:27 PM PDTBut I like to address the tone and content of comments that are or will come from the gutter. Anyone indiscriminately calling the former regime or its members 'devil' is either blind or not Iranian and certainly lacks any decency to equate them with the islamic thugs in anyway, shape or form. The author of this article has not ruled Iran nor has he hurt anyone so your pre-conviction is more an indication of who you are than him as a person or as crown prince. To the extent that islamic regime is an illegitimate haroomzade regime, Reza is a legitimate crown prince. Shah (RIP) made plenty of mistakes but he was of Iran and for Iran and even missteps were within human range. Those of you who are used to islamic regime period misery and abuse and temperament will have a hard time understanding the honorable place Iran held despite many shortcomings and flaws. We certainly were not known as filthy islamic terrorists. To compare Shah and his regime to the bloodsucking subhuman foreigners ruling Iran today is a very good identifier of those comparing.
Now dear Reza Pahlavi,
I do not believe sanctions will work in any form. If there are to be any sacntions they should be 'smart' as you suggest. For example blocking Islamic regime cargo ships in certain routs, blockade of technologies of control (Nokia, deep packet inspection and other bit level technologies, and so on). However, between China, Russia and others any void will be filled quickly under the radar as they have in the past. West has been a key technology provider to to islamic thugs. Sanctions have never worked and they never will and the new global order does not help(//iranian.com/main/node/82429) and will not help. Islamic regime is like the bastard child no one wants but everyone can milk it for money and goods in exchange for ignoring what they do to Iran.
The answer is extention of the current Iranian uprising and empowering it to enable an extented civil protest of attrition with the islamic regime. Iranians will have to fight this battle by themselves. Peacefully first, and then by all means necessary. I respectfully think your energy will be most valuable in that direction.
Louie Louie, Well put. I feel your pain. Now watch the shaohllahy and anti hurling start.
Dariush, which States?!
by Faramarz_Fateh on Wed Sep 30, 2009 03:58 PM PDTYou said "In eight years 200,000 Iranians were killed and millions were injured by the states you defend so much and there was not a single demonstration by you and other oppositions against these states".
Could you please tell us which States? And how he is supporting them?
I think I missed that one completely.
Speaking of the devil, he showed up.
by Dariush on Wed Sep 30, 2009 03:37 PM PDTReza, Iran is not Africa. A few years ago you were advocating military actions against Iran and i am sure you still do. What has changed is your strategy. You have become a bit wiser and don't advocate the bombing publicly. As i said before, your views have no value for Iranians. May be after you return billions of Dollars you father stole from Iran and to poor Iranians and after you start criticising and condemning west and Israelis actions against Iran and others just as you do with IRI, then Iranians might, just might give a damn about your views. In eight years 200,000 Iranians were killed and millions were injured by the states you defend so much and there was not a single demonstration by you and other oppositions against these states. If anything, you supported them and you are held partially responsible by Iranians.
.
by Louie Louie on Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:09 AM PDT.
What is your position on Islam dude?
by Faramarz_Fateh on Wed Sep 30, 2009 02:44 PM PDTI am writing this as if Reza P will be reading this, but what the heck. Trust me, I am not mental yet:
Your father had numerous opportunities to rid Iran of Islam and Islamic clerics. Instead of continuing the path of his great father, Mohammad Reza not only did not cleanse Iran of the shits called Akhoond/Mullah/Imam Jomeh/Ayatollah etc, he like a coward went to Haj in Saudi Arabia.
He had the opportunity to kill Khomeini in 1971 and again in 1974. Instead he was boinking blonds imported from the U.S. and Sweden and allowing Savak to do as they pleased with youth of Iran.
What is your position on Islam in a free Iran? Be a man like your grand father. Only then you can lead.