Iran Part 2 CQ04960 from marie maggiolo on Vimeo.
01-Jul-2011Recently by mehrdadm | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Omid Djalili: The Baha'i Faith in Words and Images | 11 | Dec 05, 2012 |
Dimmed Lanterns | 1 | Dec 05, 2012 |
Iranian TV shows off 'captured US ScanEagle drone' | 5 | Dec 04, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Shah understood Islamic Institutions produced corruption...
by amirparvizforsecularmonarchy on Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:10 PM PDTShah also knew west was supporting these corrupt authorities for neocolonial motives, from which they have not given up on one bit.
A religion which sanctions rape, torture, murder, lies and fear... To me that is Devil worshiping.... but it is really the result of having corrupt authorities which are not even religious, but cruel and ignorant humans, with little education.
It requires an extraordinary level of ignorance to blame the shah for the creation of this, that is unless you believe his rule was not correct for iran and the iranian people should be governed more like the swiss.
In that case I would have to say you are not a sincere democrat, but have either no idea what you are saying or are just plainly delusional. Iran was not ready for democracy then and is even less ready now. Even if you secularize the system, Iranians will still not be able to function well in a democratic environment.
How long will it take soosan kanoom to realize shah was great for Iran? I'm not holding my breath, it may never happen. never ever in a million years and 10,000 reincarnations of this lifetime.
Revolution or Counter-revolution ?
by esmal3kaleh on Mon Jul 04, 2011 08:23 AM PDTWhat happened in 1979 (in my humble opinion) was not a revolution. It was a "counter-revolution" against the ideals and accomplishments of the constitutional revolution. The seed of this counter-revolution was planted by Sheikh Fazlollah Nouri.
Reza Shah, and M. Reza Shah acted merely as project managers, and all the great men and women of that time contributed to progress of Iran, each with his/her own expertise. Davar, Foroughi, Mossadegh, Bahar, Fazollah Reza, Dr Mojtahedi, Farrokhroo Parsa, Hekmat, Dr Sooratgar, Yamini Sharif, Dehkhoda ... and many more.
The progress made during Reza Shah's tenure was the dream and plan of the constitutionalists, yet they were not able to fullfil them for 15 years after the Const. Rev. due to the lack of a good project manager. That is why when Reza Khan came about, everyone gathered around him.
Unfortunately, the intellectuals of 1979 did not know their own people very well, and that how much influence religion had on the people."Seyyed e Owlad e Peyghambar" was enough for the majority.
The intellectuals were swept away by the tide of the islamic counter-revolution.
Khomeini, the Shah, and the Revolution
by Ali P. on Sat Jul 02, 2011 08:18 AM PDTI am not talking about the Revolution, revolutionaries, and the Shah.
I am just asking, if you ever followed Khomeini, do you feel like an idiot or not.
You may feel like an idiot, or you may not; for whatever reason. I am not passing any judgment on you.
I would just like to hear from those who did, at one point, followed Khomeini and his crap.
That's all !
"DON'T YOU FEEL LIKE AN IDIOT..."
by پندارنیک on Fri Jul 01, 2011 08:26 PM PDTThe revolution was not so much about following Khomeini as it was about disobeying the regime of the Shah. One has to remember that the Shah had long passed the political point of return; he, belatedly, started to seek advice from those whose pleas for reforms he had rejected with the highest degree of cockiness and arrogance only a few years earlier. The creation of the Resurrection Party was the final nail in the coffin.
Revolution is not a choice to be avoided, it's a historical event based on social necessities which can be prevented to some degree for a limited time, only if the right anti-revolutionary means have been utilized correctly............If it was not Khomeini, and a rather smooth transition of power in '79, then there would have been another one some years later with a much bloodier price tag.
DON'T YOU FEEL LIKE AN IDIOT...
by Ali P. on Fri Jul 01, 2011 07:50 PM PDTif you ever followed Khomeini and his crap???
Shah Paved the way for the emergence of the status quo
by jasonrobardas on Fri Jul 01, 2011 02:21 PM PDTThrough his system of tyranny ,brutality, stagnation and corruption.
Neither Shah was God or Khomy was Devil
by عموجان on Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:34 AM PDTWe had a religion, which was private, and we could go to it when our soul needed help,now that is gone (we gave it up) to a force full, nonsense, made up religion which is based on rape, death, murder, lies and fear and that’s what rule Iran now. To me that is Devil worshiping.
usa and uk and france
by Poosteh Pesteh on Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:23 AM PDTtheir movie in 1979 just see it
Amoo
by Soosan Khanoom on Fri Jul 01, 2011 09:31 AM PDTPeople like you who thought SHAH was God had brought the devil to us .....
JJ ...... what this site has turned to ?
A Place for bunch of senior citizens who used to worship SHAH ? It is ok ..... they need a place to vent ...
When Iran give up God to follow Devil.
by عموجان on Fri Jul 01, 2011 09:17 AM PDTNothing stay the same, good days are ahead. We all learned something about Iran in 32 years.