Let me put this really simply. I do not think the problem we have with the Ayatollah regime, is related to their doctrine, or even them. It is related to the people who benefit from the Ayatollahs being in some sort of control. And it is “some sort of control”. The rather loose anarchy that rules over patches of Iran is fed from various sources. Most of the sources are in India. Of course there is China and others in the non-aligned movement, but historically the British left Persia in the hands of the Delhi office.
Recently though the US has started to get up the Indians’ noses, forcing them to take sides. Forcing India to take sides is very tough. This is the most tolerant nation in the world. Just look at the folks in Lucknow who allowed the likes of Khomeini to get nourished with Islamic-Marxism. They are the most anti-Capitalist or anti-US people in the world. They though are having a hard time with the Obama administration. Obama has given them no reason to shout. Obama has single handedly disarmed the radical chic in the world.
Well guess what, the radical chic are going to be in the Security Council soon:
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6BU1KI20101231
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6BU1KI20101231?pageNumber=2
If you read reports like the one above, you get the feeling that the radical chic are going to finally get their Ayatollahs’ to go head on against the “Capitalist Pig” USA. This actually has been the main problem with the radical chic, ever since they sided with the black. Yes the alliance of red and black is very true. How many lefties really criticize the Ayatollahs? Most think that the “Islamic Republic” will disppear, and the true “Republic” will finally come around. They seriously think that pure democracy is more important than culture, even if it means that “democracy” can vote to change the flag, the national anthem, and the name of a country. That is what has happened to Iran. Iran does not exist and many people are benefiting from it.
Never have so many people done business with this anti-Iran, anti-Iranian culture, than now. Look at the amount of Iranian businessmen who do not care about Iran, and trade with India and China and kept the Ayatollahs in power. What if the “Iranian businessman”, were “Iran First”, as we say now. What if they said to themselves, “am I helping the Ayatollahs to stay in power, doing this deal?” That tiny brain of theirs will think, “Fat chance, take the money and run.”
If you read that article, you will see there is this sentence on page two:
“If Iran does something outrageous, it’s going to be hard for countries like India and South Africa to resist further sanctions,” Cirincione said.
And that is what has been happening for thirty odd years. Ironically the rogue regime has managed to get a lot credit by capturing the world’s attention by representing “Iran”, the “Iran” they do not even recognise, and changed the name of. But the other countries, especially the new trading partners like India, China, and other so called “Non-Aligned Nations” have recognised the Ayatollahs, and referred to them as “Iranians”.
As you know I have gone even wackier than normal, and have asked every person to describe Ayatollahs’ activities as non-Iranian. I have found myself on the same side as the Rajavi’s crowd on this. Unbelievable. In fact many authors are isolating the “Ayatollah virus” in their compositions, to make sure the word “Iran” is not mixed with them. We still get articles saying, “Iran hates USA”, and and if they have a comment box, I am there with my comments.
So life has passed us by every one of these thirty years as a new set of horrible factories are suddenly discovered when ElBaradei was about to give a clean bill of health to the nuclear activities in Iran. Every time ElBaradei was about to prove to the US that there is nothing to worry about, there would be new photos to ruin his speech. Now that Ayatollah ElBaradei is gone, we have another problem. This time it is the new members of UNSC. But don’t worry read the article below:
http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20110103_9439.php
So here we go again. We are back to catch-22. Why catch-22? You see the whole problem is for the situation not to be resolved. Let us says the Ayatollahs got the nukes and did press the button. Then the situation in Iran would change. Let us say, the Israelis attacked Iran, then the situation would change. Let us say the US attacked Iran, then the situation would change. Are you getting my drift? Someone does not want change for Iran. Iran has to be in this quandry forever. This quandry or catch-22 is what keeps some people rich. Who are they?
First of all, the regime itself benefits from the catch-22, as the world will not accept any other “Iranian Institution”. How many times have I told HIM Cyrus-Reza Pahlavi to get off his ass and do his job properly. Yes I will use this language. We are f…ing frustrated. The mandate of the Royal Institution is to ACT only when the nation is in danger. He gets into politics and wants democracy to decide for him what to do, when his mandate is to save Iran, and then to bring democracy after we have our flag, anthem and name of country back. His father listened to my grandad, but he does not listen to me. He sets up questionnaires, and then writes letter to people as a Human Rights Activist. You are the King of Iran. What are you doing? He should tell the UN to kick out the regime’s representative, because of Human Rights violations and nuclear violations. But he does not do that. Why?
So what can we Iranians do? Madness. We have all gone in our own ways, and fragmented.
But the US and all the other nations will keep the Ayatollahs around as public enemy number one to bolster their military industry forever. We all know that that is the main reason for the catch-22 the nuclear fiasco has been doing for the past thirty something years. The military regimes in both US and Iran benefit from this scenario and they will never stop this catch-22.
