The sanctions also bar sales of European jets with a certain amount of U.S. parts, limiting Iran's ability to buy from Europe.
As a result, Iran has focused on Russian-built planes – like the
Tupolev and Ilyushins, the Soviet-era workhorses for Russian civil air
fleets. After the Soviet collapse, government funding sharply declined
for manufacturers of aircraft and spare parts, and other countries
using the planes have had a harder time getting parts.
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Ofcourse a t.......l can ask a simple q.
by capt_ayhab on Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:27 PM PDThere it goes with all the causes:
There have been 63 serious flight incidents with Tu-154s, including 36 hull-losses with human fatalities. Six of those incidents resulted from terrorist or military action including an accidental missile shoot down by the Ukraine,
several from poor runway conditions (including one which struck snow ploughs
on the runway), cargo overloading by airlines in the lapse of
post-Soviet federal safety standards (several cases),
and mid-air collisions due to faulty air traffic control or mis-communication.
Other incidents have resulted from mechanical
problems (two cases prior to 1998),
running out of fuel on an unscheduled extended route,
pilot error, and cargo fires. According to
the BBC, the Tu-154 has an average safety record for its length of service, and
few accidents appear to have been due to technical failure.
regular route crashed near the Lebanese shoreline. All 50 passengers
and 10 crew on board died. No official statement has ever been made.
crashed into the Atlantic Ocean and broke in half 300 m (984 ft) from
the runway due to defective apparatus in the control tower at the Nouadhibou International Airport.
Only one passenger, an elderly woman suffering from heart disease, died
of a heart attack. The other 151 passengers and 16 crew escaped.
The plane skidded 400 m (1,312 ft) on the runway and became airborne as
the pilots applied throttle. The plane landed successfully on its
wheels. There were no injuries, but it was deemed uneconomical to repair the aircraft.
an intermediate stop, killing all 145 people onboard. The cause of
accident was pilot error resulting in exceeding the safe angle of
attack and the subsequent stall.
The accident was caused by problems with the air traffic control system
in Zurich and erroneous instructions given by the air traffic
controller on duty.
from Moscow to Sochi crashed after being bombed by an on-board Chechen
suicide bomber, killing all 46 people on the aircraft. This happened
almost simultaneously with a similar bomb explosion on
Volga-Aviaexpress airlines TU-134 flight from Moscow to Volgograd.
crashed near the Russian border over eastern Ukraine in an attempt to
fly through a weather front. All 160 passengers (including 45 children)
and 10 crew were killed.
crashed 16 minutes after take-off near the Iranian city of Qazvin,
killing all people onboard. Police reported that witnesses saw the
aircraft's tail on fire as it circled and attempted an emergency
landing. The crash, in an agricultural field, left a path of wreckage
200 yards long. Authorities were able to locate two out of the three
aircraft flight recorders, although they do appear to be damaged
Khappy now?
-YT
sorry
by IRANdokht on Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:02 AM PDTcomputer hickup
IRANdokht
LOL
by IRANdokht on Fri Jul 17, 2009 09:42 AM PDTThanks Capt'n (and oonam keh gofti khodeti :-P )
na baba what nokhod siah. Can't a girl ask a simple question?
I was just saying the data was not complete for me to draw the same conclusion as you were.Thanks for giving me half the data with additional links to go find the rest myself LOL
In any case, I'm still totally against economic sanctions.
Have a wonderful day
IRANdokht
IRANdokht jan to.....l jan ;-)
by capt_ayhab on Fri Jul 17, 2009 07:48 AM PDTAllow me to repeat, Crashes are based on mile/passenger/year, plus the area they cover.
Arguably one of the most notable civilian airliners of its era, the
Tu-154 has been the mainstay 'workhorse' of Soviet airlines for several
decades, servicing well over a sixth of the
world's landmass and carrying about half of all passengers flown by
Aeroflot and its subsidiaries in that time (137.5 mill/year or 243.8
billion pass/kms in 1990).
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TU-134
And if you check the other sites they will give all relative data, unless you want to send me after Nokhod Siah? lol
-YT
all that noted sir
by IRANdokht on Thu Jul 16, 2009 06:08 PM PDTbaba capitan jan
if there were 10000 AB flights and 2 crashed, it'd be relatively better than having 2000 Topelov flights and one of them crashing!
it's the relative number that's important and none of those links shows a relative number.
These Topelov were made by the Soviet Union. It's been a while...
After the fall of the Soviet Union, Iran was stuck with those old planes because of the sanctions that did not allow newer aircraft from other resources. There is no more Soviet Union for Iran to buy spare parts and new aircrafts from.
No matter how you look at it, Iran is not using Topelov because they're "better" planes!
IRANdokht
IRANdokht jan
by capt_ayhab on Thu Jul 16, 2009 03:28 PM PDTNumbers that I gave you with link are not relative numbers[%] they are actual accidents. If you refer to the link you will find all the info needed.
As i have said before, I am not much for Russian made goods, but one manufacturing system that is prevalent in Russia is simplistic and uncomplicated designs, which make for far easier maintenance and less break downs.
This link will give you bit of data on Topolov which is sister design to DC 9, with first flight in 1967.
The Tupolev is a Soviet medium-range trijet airliner designed in the mid 1960s. Arguably one of the most notable civilian airliners of its era, the Tu-154 has been the mainstay 'workhorse' of Soviet airlines for several decades, servicing well over a sixth of the
world's landmass and carrying about half of all passengers flown by Aeroflot and its subsidiaries in that time (137.5 mill/year or 243.8 billion pass/kms in 1990).
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TU-134
For total accidents by airline and or year and number of fatalities you can see the links below.
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and...
//www.planecrashinfo.com/cause.htm
Topolov with its long service has had less accidents than relatively new Airbus series[introduced in 1978], with 35 fatal accidents thus far
-YT
P/S In last 2 months or so there has been 3 fatal accidents of which two were Airbus.
Capt'n jan
by IRANdokht on Thu Jul 16, 2009 02:16 PM PDTThanks for the info, but for me these numbers are hard to figure out. When you say since 1950's this many have crashed, how many total plane were produced by all those different manufacturers and out of how many flights did these statistics come from?
I have no idea how many Topolov Russia has made since 1950 compared to Boeing, but I think that should be factored in too. I also tried to find that info myself but was not able to. I'd appreciate some help :o)
IRANdokht
Dears IRANdokht, Ostaad
by capt_ayhab on Thu Jul 16, 2009 01:55 PM PDTDue respect, As sad as it is to lose that many lives in an airplane crash allow me to interject by saying that although I am not much for Russian made goods, but I posted this comment in a blog by Mr. Sepehr and I would like to share it with you guys.
Statistically, Russian made Topolov and Yakovlev have been in much less accidents compared to Boeing, DC series and even Airbus series:
Sepehrby capt_ayhab on Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:20 AM PDT
Not that I am found of Russian made air planes BUT just a little bit of research before any blog will be nice.
Since 1950's the partial list of air crashes by type are as follows:
Airbus 35 Accidents
Boeing 176 Accidents
McDonald Douglas 89 Accidents
Topolov+Yakavlev 32 Accidents
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and...
According to statistics followings are the causes of crashes:
55%: Flight crew error
17%: Airplane
13%: Weather
7%: Misc./Other
5%: Air traffic control
3%: Maintenance
I am by no means an aeronautical engineer , but what I hear is that the strength of Russian jet liners are due to their simple and uncomplicated designs, as opposed to highly sophisticated American and European models. Their simple design is a huge plus when it comes to equipment maintenance and malfunction.
Besides as you notice, statistics contribute only 17% of all crashes to equipment.
regards
-YT
Thank you Ostaad
by IRANdokht on Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:56 AM PDTThese sanctions hurt the people more than they would ever hurt the government.
Stop the sanctions against Iranian people and save their lives!
IRANdokht
Khamenei AN: Stop anti Americanism, so O can lift sanctions!
by Farhad Kashani on Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:21 AM PDTOstaad,
Tell your beloved IRI regime to stop its blind and stupid 24/7 bashing of America so it can lift sanctions. Its out of thuggishness to insult and bash someone, then ask them (actually order them) to do you a favor! Not only you don't have any logic, but apparently, you don't have character either!
Ofcourse, we know that IRI doesnt give a rats a@@ about Iranian lives, so whose naive to think they would stop doing that? IRI survives on anti Americanism.