The still-missing central fact in the Iran drama
Salon.com / Glenn Greenwald
07-Oct-2009 (5 comments)

After all, if Iran voluntarily notified the IAEA of the Qom facility before it was even operational and thus agreed to have the facility inspected, it's impossible to maintain the melodramatic storyline that Iran was planning something deeply nefarious here and got "caught red-handed."  The assertion that Iran was forced into disclosure is vital to the entire plot, and it's been constantly repeated as fact.

But ever since this episode began, I've read countless accounts from numerous sources and never once saw a single piece of evidence to support this claim -- and I've been actively looking for it and asking if anyone has seen such evidence.  Today in Time Magazine, Bobby Ghosh writes of an exclusive interview he conducted with CIA Director Leon Panetta about Qom, in which Panetta claims the CIA knew of the facility for three years. 

>>>
recommended by Shah Ghollam

Balatarin
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
پیام

Fozul bashi ( fozuli nakon). Nope, I didn't read the article.

by پیام on Fri Oct 09, 2009 01:39 AM PDT

I just commented based on my hate towards ali geda's gholam here.


  •  
Shah Ghollam

Fouzul Bashi

by Shah Ghollam on Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:37 PM PDT

Payam is a well known charactor here. His inputs are almost always out of desperation, no depth indeed! As you can see, he could not say a word on the article hardly an exception.


  •  
Fouzul Bashi

پیام خان

Fouzul Bashi
Thu Oct 08, 2009 09:26 AM PDT

مطلب را خوندی؟ یا فقط از رو دشمنی comment گذاشتی؟


  •  
پیام

You are the expert on Hot Air.

by پیام on Thu Oct 08, 2009 09:24 AM PDT

Based on your comments here, you are the expert  on Hot Air. I guess that's why you can know  ;)


  •  
IRANdokht

Great article

by IRANdokht on Thu Oct 08, 2009 07:10 AM PDT

Thank you for posting

IRANdokht


  •