Israel wants diplomatic solution to Iran nuclear row – Peres
TV Washington / TV Washington
17-Oct-2009 (47 comments)

Washington, 16 October (WashingtonTV)—Israeli President Shimon Peres said in remarks published on Thursday that his country preferred sanctions over force in curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions, insisting that Israel did “not want to see blood”.

In an interview with the Daily Telegraph, Peres downplayed the chances of a unilateral Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

“My opinion is that the world has to let President [Barack] Obama to find a solution by way of sanctions and diplomacy,” he told the London-based newspaper.

>>>
recommended by capt_ayhab

Balatarin
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
kharmagas

Mr. FK

by kharmagas on Mon Oct 19, 2009 05:54 PM PDT

Farhad Kashani says:
"capt ayhab, Martikeh, you....."


NO COMMENT Mr. FK.


  •  
Farhad Kashani

capt ayhab, Martikeh, you

by Farhad Kashani on Mon Oct 19, 2009 05:19 PM PDT

capt ayhab,

Martikeh, you thin we forgot your support for the Fascist IRI regime? You people are professional and

Pathological liars. You are also desperate and pathetic propagandists. You come out here spreading your pro IRI propaganda and think you can fool people. Well the joke is on you.

 

The Iranian people consider one, and only one, group enemies and vatan fooroush and khaen, and that’s people who support the IRI regime, people who apologize for its crimes, people who bash Israel in favor of IRI (not in favor of Palestinian people), and you definitely fall into that group.

 


  •  
capt_ayhab

Kashani and his lies

by capt_ayhab on Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:11 PM PDT

Kashani,

when are you going to stop lying about anyone who does not like your opportunist and treacherous stand on Iran?

I mean come on dude, anytime you type, you either lie , spread your arajeef about how peace loving Israel is, or slander people.

Mardak You don't even live in Iran, which is much better since Iranians despise vatan foorosh lairs like you, so what is your problem? Just earn your pay check from your MASTERS in AIPAC and keep reciting from your hand book which your masters have given you.

 

-YT 


  •  
Farhad Kashani

Shepesh jaan, Ghorbanat

by Farhad Kashani on Sun Oct 18, 2009 09:27 PM PDT

Shepesh jaan,

Ghorbanat aziz. And you are doing a marvelous job exposing IRI, its supporters and its agenda.

benross,

I'm not sure how long you have been coming to this site, but trust me my friend, he used to passionately support IRI. You can trace his comments. Every time someone posted something negative about IRI prior to june 12th uprising, he would come to IRIs support.

Anyone who blames IRIs actions on Israel, or blames the situation in Iran on Israel, or blames Iran Israel fued on Israel, which capt ayhab does all, is directly or indirectly supporting IRI. These people always talk about Israel attacking Iran (which by the way they have been saying for 30 years and it never happened!) but never, ever, ever, say who caused this fued and why does Israel feel like it needs to attack Iran. So they are either imcapable of thinking clearly, or they are deliberately justifying IRIs vicous actions.


  •  
benross

Farhad

by benross on Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:20 PM PDT

I don't believe captain is pro IRI. He has strong opinion about Israel to which he is entitled. He might also have some prejudice about Israel to which he is not rigid and the posting of this news is a sign of his open-mindedness. I respect captain and I wouldn't compare him with Ostaad or Shah Gholam.

I guess we all can use some open-mindedness at times. 


  •  
default

.

by Shepesh on Wed Nov 25, 2009 03:32 AM PST

.


  •  
Farhad Kashani

NA GAZA NA LEBANON JAANAM FADAYEH IRAN

by Farhad Kashani on Sun Oct 18, 2009 07:38 AM PDT

capt ayhab,

Engaging in anti Israeli propaganda will not save your beloved IRI regime. How you ever asked yourself why does Israel feel as if it needs to attack Iran? Have you ever asked what caused Israel to feel this way? Have you ever asked why does IRI take this stance towards Israel? Have you ever asked yourself what if IRI wouldnt've started this animosity with Israel? Have you ever asked whether "the Zionists still would've loved to bomb Iran" (according to you)? Have you ever asked who authorized IRI to take this stance towards Israel? And if IRI is righteous with this stance towards Israel, shoudn't it have enough confidence to let Iranians talk about Israel freely in their own damn country, the same way Palestinians get to freely talk about Israel in Israel itself?

Now those are questions that IRI supporters leftists never can answer. Can they?

Who you and Ostaad and Shah Gholam and Bavafa think you're foolng? The Iranian people? This is what Iranian people said to 30 years of IRI propaganda:

NA GAZA NA LEBANON JAANAM FADAYEH IRAN


  •  
benross

Israel is not our concern.

by benross on Sun Oct 18, 2009 02:43 AM PDT

Israel is not our concern. The extended version was explained in my comment that I accidentally deleted. I don't care to repeat because it's lengthy. How do you think Netanyahu gets elected if he doesn't keep the hype going? It's internal. No, I don't read Israeli papers. I wait for you to report!


  •  
Ostaad

benross, so you're saying the country that...

by Ostaad on Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:09 PM PDT

"leaks" news and brags about military attacks on Iran is not "our concern"?!!! If not then what is, the Livestock and Seed prices in Texas?!!!

I don't know about you, but I read several major Israeli publications and there is not a single day that Iran is not mentioned in ALL of them. The Jerusalem Post has an entire section called, "Iran Threat", dedicated to discussing Iran.

 


  •  
benross

Shepesh

by benross on Sat Oct 17, 2009 06:29 PM PDT

Thank you for your comment. I just let you know that I wrote a lengthy response to you. Luckily for you, I closed my browser when my comment was in preview mode. So it's all gone! I don't want to repeat it again but just to let you know I didn't ignore you.

I only wished this word 'Israel' disappeared from Iranian.com because it's not our concern. 


  •  
Shah Ghollam

Iran should not care!

by Shah Ghollam on Sat Oct 17, 2009 04:04 PM PDT

I agree with you. Israel does not want war, but curtailment of iran nuclear program as it feels that Iran has threatened its existence at every opportunity.

Iran should not and does not live for others. If Israel "feels" this and that, that is their own darn problem. When was Israel sensitive to what other nations "feel" ?

Postpondement of attack dates (for a decade now) and issuing statements in favor of diplomacy are all because the military option is no possible option for too many reasons. Israel cannot afford to attck Iran, it is as simple as that. The rest is all twist and turns in International politics and boasting self imgae.

It is the first time in post WWII history that a Muslim country in ME has a substantial retalitory arsenal. That is the only way a country like Israel understands "limits" not diplomatic maneuvering.

Isreal is an inherently aggressive military country and the past 60 years of history offers much  in terms of evidence to backup what I claim here. Force is their main tool of trade and the only way they have respect for you is simply how big of stick you carry, nothing else. In other words, a bully always wants to be in charge of his territory, the only way to subdue a bully is simply to show him how badly he will bleed when he attcks. After that peace prevails.

 

 


  •  
default

.

by Shepesh on Wed Nov 25, 2009 03:33 AM PST

.


  •  
Ostaad

Peres is not doing anyone a favor by being...

by Ostaad on Sat Oct 17, 2009 01:21 PM PDT

more realistic, less belligerent and war mongering. After all, most war criminals/terrorists want to leave this world while there is still time to improve their criminal reputations.

Peres is no exception.


  •  
benross

The news is that Shimon

by benross on Sat Oct 17, 2009 01:11 PM PDT

The news is that Shimon Peres gives some space for Obama diplomacy. It means Israel has no plan to bomb Iran. That must hurt!


  •  
Ostaad

I'm wondering why JJ is not clarifying this issue...

by Ostaad on Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:18 PM PDT

after all he's making money from their ads, while WashingtonTV is allowed to post news items just like you and I who are merely interested and unpaid site participant!!!

How generous, at the same time unprofessional, of JJ to let paying advertisers to impersonate voluntary news posters and forum participants!!! 


  •  
capt_ayhab

Ostaad

by capt_ayhab on Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:33 AM PDT

I actually was hoping that you could help on that question.

All I know that they are a public affairs broadcasting from Washington. Do you think FCC might have public records about the people behind? I am going to do some research and get back to you.

Regards

-YT 


  •  
Ostaad

cap, I have raised this point before and...

by Ostaad on Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:44 AM PDT

I have got no answer. Do you have any idea who funds WashingtonTV and why is it such a big secret who's behind it?

I've noticed WashingtonTV is allowed to post news items as you and I do, but they are an advertiser on this site too!

So whatup with this outfit?

-Sorry did not want to go to byraaheh, but I just very curious about this outfit, and I thought you might know.


  •  
« first‹ previous12