Pictory

Q: If you're not paid for

Q: If you're not paid for your service by the Islamic Republic of Torture, you should be...You're a prolific mouth-piece, peddling the agenda of the most vile and brutal regime. Or you might already be on the payroll???

Qumars/Q, in your response

Qumars/Q, in your response to me you refered to me as "anti-iran". Why? because I chose the name anti-IRI for my ID? Since when being anti-IRI means anti-Iran? You got this in reverse.
Now go lick clean a basiji ass.

Qumars is a snitch?

Hey Qumars, you son of bitch... Yes YOU. I hear you are an IRI snitch. Do you wanna snitch on me too? I am anti-IRI and I hate the mullahs. I'll dare you to snitch on me. I'll even give you my name and address, as long as I can meet with you face to face... Deal?

Qumars: chendesh avari

Qumars you are so "chendesh avar"

Q you impossibly lost soul

Q why dont you save your breath and painful typing effort, not to mention to spare us, and stop opining on this site?
.
As the other commentor said, go "throw up" your bankrupt, fascist, animalistic thoughts in another place.
.

Anti-Iran: do you speak English?

I demonstrated below why I'm calling people fascists based on the vicious mentality demonstrated in the posts below. Anyone curious, can review my reasons by reading. In addition I attacked "foam-in-the-mouth butt-kissing Monarchists" without naming names. Does that describes you? If so, you have a right to be offended.

You on the other hand, have absolutely no basis of fact that I'm "pro-IRI", you cite no writing of mine and your incoreherent tirade makes no sense whatsoever. Once again, I called people like Jamshid fascists for what they wrote which can be read by anyone below. You are just angry and frustrated that the world doesn't work according to your fantasies.

-Qumars

I.R. Not a worst violator of human rights? Oh yah!

Here is the Am. Int. data from last year (2006) regarding executions only: #1: china with 1000+ executions, #2: I.R. with 177 executions (this year I.R. execution are 221 so far). If one considers per capita data, iran becomes #1.

Re: Qumars

Qumars, who the hell are you to call anyone, ANYONE, a fascist animal? Who the hell are YOU to even talk about honor and dignity?
.
You are a pro-IRI soldout who turns his face away from the mullahs who are torturing, murdering and raping your fellow brothers and sisters.
.
Who knows? Maybe you have even snitched on one or two of the freedom fighters. Your likes do this a lot, everyone knows that. Maybe even right now one of my fellow countrymen is being tortured so a GARBAGE like you can come here and throw up his opinions on this site.
.
You are a criminal and a traitor to Iran and Iranians.

Thanks Face the Fact and Qrum ;)

Actually, I'm lost for words too.

If you find one, please throw the shahi lot and columbia university into the same pot. Money, money, money.

I love it when they change the subject...

sure, whatever, I'm all for Animal rights. as far as comparing, Iran has never SINCE the revolution been eemed the "worst" violator in the world by Amnesty International, EVER. If foam-in-the-mouth butt-kissing Monarchists want to blame Saddam's invasion on the current regime, than, there really is no point in trying to reason with them. These cowards sat on their ass in hollywood and London while 17 year old bassiji's threw themselves under tanks so there can BE an Iran these assholes can fight over. Now they blame the victim for the atrocities of the US-backed aggressor? Have you no shame? (I know the answer of course, just look what they do to anyone who dares think differently.)

To Caspianseamermaid

I am with you on your point. Comparing IR leaders, with animals is an insult to the poor animals. I just don't know what the right adjective would be: changiz khan, taymoure-lang, alexander the great! -- even these were rather harmless towards their own people.

Petty & Cruel Dictator

The Shah was at worst an autocrat. If he was the dictator you think he was, all those who are in charge of Iran now, would have been DEAD! But they're alive. And the reason this regime has survived as long as it has, is not its democratic ways, but the simple fact that the opposition has been decapitated and has no leadership. Those that were executed during the Shah's time were marxist bank robbers or terrorists, and they died deservedly.

To Face-the-fact and others . ANIMALS?

Please, show me a single incident of any other species, other than the human animal, that has killed thousands of people.
Please, stop comparing every insane maniac to animals. Thank you.

animals are those who murdered tens of thousands of our youth

and their backers in the past 28 years viciously (see Am. Int. reports). Being shahollahi is not an insult anymore, even though it is an oxymoron. Maybe it was an insult back in the seventies that shah was considered a violator of human rights, and he was, but nothing compared to murderers in IR who murdered our youth under the name of allah and mofsed-o-felarz. Go back and read Am. Int. reports, from both seventies and post revolution, and compare them objectively rather than by the sole force of vulgarity. Here is the fact: no iranian shah in history (excluding foreign aggressors like mongols, tatars, arabs, and eskandar) killed as many innocent iranians as the IR. Even agha-mohammad-khane ghajar who was a nasty character is a saint compared to likes of emam and his godless gangesters. Had emam not abused the trust that iranians put in him by murdering their youth in thousands, robbing their resources and sending $s to arabs, and lying to the country continuously, we would not be seeing any 'shahoallahi' today that would dream of the good old days -- and there are lots of 'shahollahis' today even among youth inside iran, even though the chance of going back to those day (with reza pahlavi) is pretty much zero. Governing iran is a very difficult task as long as we have lots of people who are emotional and vulgar, in the name of either allah or marx, instead of rational and objective.

Money

Has anyone checked out who or what group made substantial financial contributions to Columbia university prior to AhmaGHdenijad's visit?

By the way, there are some good videoclips on
www.theREALnews.com

Foaad, I apologize on behalf of these animals.

I apologize to you on behalf of these animals. They are nothing bu fascist animals. they are cowards who have no honor, dignity or humanity. They just as well hide behind their fake names and fake lives and smear anyone they want unfairly. jamshid is a known asshole shahollahi. He has been caught redhanded slandering you, and he doesn't hvae the balls to even admit it. what a pathetic excuse of a human. jamshid slandered you AND JJ and he's too chickenshit to admit it.
But you also really need to have thick skin round here. the place is crawling with fascists and shahollahis. I actually agree with the text of this blog and even that's not a crime, let alone just forwarding a link. Iran under the shah was the worst human rights violater in the entire 70's.
That's from Amnesty International, you apologist assholes.

-Qumars Bolourchian

Re: Fooad Which link?

Fooad, do you mean you sent the link to the picture only? Or the link to the picture and also to the text too? Please respond.

PS to Jamshid

Sir First, I'm terribly sorry to have to say that you are a liar. This is what you wrote:

Foad, if you want to be taken seiously, even by your own likes, then please refrain from exageration.
You say that "The shah was one of the most horrible dictators..." ???? Dictator? Yes by all means.

and now you make the unlikely claim that not only yourself but ALL people below knew that it wasn't me who said this, even though you yourself used the words "you say"? That's a terrible lie.

Secondly. You just now claimed that if someone just excerpted the text, it means that they deserve the vitriol, just like the author. Well, it was Jahanshah Javid who did that. Are you willing to say the he deserves all this vitriol, including the attacks on his character and name?

Did you see movaffagh?

An iraqi official was just on CSPAN saying that he doesn't mind pain to be brought on tehran. this is what you get from an arab, back stabbing instead of apologizing to all iranians for a devastating war that they began on iran. this is the true nature of arabs and what they wish for iranians. shame on I.R.I. for being so pro-arab and anti-irani.

I didn't excerpt the text, JJ did

All I did was forward the link to him by email, as I do periodically. Are you ready to apologize, Jamshid? Otherwise, I'm very busy.

Re: Fooad

We ALL know how to read and we ALL know your text was an excerpt from Proyec. But by extracting that text from his site and posting it here, YOU have concurred with his words. Therefore his words are an echo of your opinion. Therefore BOTH Proyec and you deserves this "vitriol" as you call it.

If I am wrong then why don't you tell us all what is YOUR opinion of the Shah?

I didn't write the text!

Oh my God! This was written by Louise Proyec, it's a excerpt from his blog. So, perhaps that's who deserves this vitriol, not me.

Foad sounds like an arabic name

walks like an arab, sounds like an arab, talks like an arab, cares about iran like an arab would, then he must be an arab. Just like I.R. leaders, who are really arabs occupying iran: they always start their talk in arabic, with some broken farsi words in-between; their religion is arabic; their customs are arabic; they have been robbing iran's resources and sending cash to arabs for the past 28 years; even their flag is all arabic words stepping on the sacred three-color flag of iran. So they must be arabs, specially in heart, behaviour, and religion, who have leaned to speak a broken farsi, and have dominated iran for 28 years. Who cares about words of arabs, they never have had anything good for iran. Case closed.

It is true. The Shah was a dictator

By Western standards The Pahlavis ran a dictatorship. No one voted for the Shah. By western standards the theocracy is also a dictatorship. And the Iranian leftists would also bring about a dictatorship if they were allowed to rule. All you people do is complain. And the Monarchists are as bad as everyone else. You people should stop being Iranians and start being Americans. And you Iranians in Europe should start being Europeans. And the Iranians in Canada should start being Canadian.

A sugestion

It is clear that the author is a former "Oghde ee" chapi. Although with a name like his, I can't really blame the man. "Fooad KosBood"? I suggest you change your name to "Fooad KirHast". Much more respectable.

A serious question

Hi! Does anyone know any reliable source, like Amnesty Int., and not any rants and anecdotes, that would sum up the number of executions during two pahlavi shahs versus I.R. A couple of days ago, a TV channel (I guess it was CNN) said that 221 people have been executed so far this year in iran. And I saw amnesty int. report saying number of executions peaked in 1988 to close to 5000 (although others have put that as high as 35000 (from Montazeri?)). This puts the total executions in IRI at around tens of thousands versus maybe hundred during pahlavis. Don't be insulting, just rational if you have a reliable answer for me. I just want to know the truth, not opinions and emotions. One more thing, i heard grand son of emem put that number at roughly about 100 times larger for IRI than for pahlavis' period. Mersi.

I guess you are from the same clan as emam or rajavis

At least shah was iranian and praised everything iranian. I.R. rulers are all farsi-speaking arabs; the evidence: they care more about arabs than iranians, they have put the country at the verge of war for arabs, with devastating consequences, not for them, but for the beautiful people of iran. Comparing shah with the criminal gang in I.R. only makes shah more of an angel. Ask any 'iranian' if they wished the shah to have had taken care of all these vatan-foroush mullas and rajavi clan, and i bet the majority would say yes (sadly, in rear view mirror). If you are not an iranian however, in origin and in heart, you should dislik him so much, and probably you must like I.R. dearly.

Shah was a patriot - not a

Shah was a patriot - not a dictor he defended us agianst islamist terrorists of khomeini and stalinists like you. as iranian i am shocked about to your foolish article against shah:Foad camparing shah with people like you i can say he was an angel

how in the hell can you call him worse dictator after second world war !!?? lol

you leftist-islamist soldier of khomeini are really out of any comment

shah freed iranian women 1963 from islamic slavery, he protected religiuos minorities like jews and bahahi from peple like you in iran. he finished the feudal system in iran by his own against the protests of mullas and feudals FOAD go and read the history

Wow Foad, You are one of the

Wow Foad,

You are one of the biggest retards on the planet... but it's ok, cuz your father was a retard, and your mother was a retard, and they were probably communist nokars, in the streets in 79... obviously you don't know any better. Khak too oon saret ahmaghe bi shoor.. "One of the worst dictators post WWII"... I'm laughing my ass off... Tell me, what did he do that makes him one of the worst dictators... (retard, dictators are guys like pol pot, stalin, idi amin, Kim Il Sung, Mao, Saddam Hussein, Mugabe, Castro, Franco... I could go on but your uneducated ignorant ass probably doesn't recognize half of these names, why mention less famous ones?). Vaghean afsoos...

Really?!?

If the Shah was indeed one of the most "horrible dictators of the post WWII war", as Faood so biasedly claims, then Iran today would have been a much much better place. Why? Because all the Mullahs & Akhonds would have persihed under torture & through summary executions and public hangings during Shah' reign. Unfortunatley, that was not the case.
Don't you sometimes wish it was though?

Tell us Faood,( we assume you are Iranian) did you live in Iran during the Shah's reign? how much do you really remember? Or are you one of those post revolution productions whose perception of tha past is twisted and distorted by constant IRI attempts to re-write our history.