Fly to Iran


Opinion * Benefit auction
* Support
* FAQ * Write for
* Editorial policy

Keeping an open mind
Monarchy, republic, or secular democracy

February 19, 2002
The Iranian

In my last posting, "Of kings and cylinders", I made mention of a pro-Pahlavi pen-pal friend of mine who lives in London. He is extremely irate with me for using our private correspondence as the basis for that article. He probably will be all the more angry with me for using his present displeasure as a subject for yet another writing. But here it goes anyway. I know he will understand and I apologize beforehand for this insensitivity on my part.

"Dear Guive," he opened. "How are you, hope you and your family are well? Your reply to my friendly and private email which I had sent you was recently brought to my attention. I must admit I was taken by surprise reading about myself on Especially that you had even indicated my locality! I am grateful that you did not give my email or surname in your article ...."

"I was shocked to read you[r] strong attack on me," the letter continued, "I had made the assumption that you were a constitutional monarchist ...."

"If you decide to reply to my email," he closed, "please take this as a friendly email ... and please do not publish it on Besides ... reasons, I don't like that publication as it has never published any of my letters ...."

I was dumbfounded at Bahram's dismay. How could he possibly consider any reference in "Of kings and cylinders" to his correspondence with me as a public disclosure of his identity. I would have thought that Bahram was not the only Bahram in London, with pro-Pahlavi tendencies. While using his letter to me as a basis for a reflective (one would hope) piece may have been a breach of a private expectation of privacy, it could hardly be deemed a reckless and wanton form of public betrayal.

So I wrote to him:

"Dear Bahram,

If others have brought my piece (reply) to your attention is because perhaps you have shared with them your private correspondence with me. I [had] referred [in "Of kings and cylinders"] to a gentleman who writes [to] me from London, whose name is Bahram, who is also pro-monarchy and [is] in favor of Reza Pahlavi. Are you the only person in London who fits this profile? I doubt it."

"I meant to reply to your [earlier letter to me]," I continued, "but then it posed an issue that needed public discussion. Reference to a Bahram [just as well could have been] to someone else. I think you are overreacting. As you see, there was no reference to last names, profession, or family references."

When I hit the "sent" button, I realized that Bahram may well be angry at himself for thinking that I was a pro-monarchy type. I thought I owed him an explanation, so I wrote a follow up letter to him. I t went like this:


"I do not owe it to you but I would like for you to consider this anyway. Nothing in any of my writings or discussions with anyone could possibly lead anyone to conclude that I be anything other than a republican -- in the sense of favoring the republican form of government. I am sorry that you assumed me to be otherwise. BUT, and this is a big but -- when it comes to Iran I personally do not have a particular interest in what form of government it takes to bring human rights and progress. If monarchy does it, so be it. If Reza Pahlavi can do it, so be it."

"You see," I continued, "when I became a US citizen I took [a public] oath [in a public ceremony], as do all those who are sworn as citizens here, to give my allegiance to the U.S. and its form of government and laws, and to abjure any and all allegiance to any other government, potentate or prince. So, my interest in Iranian affairs and governance cannot be anything more than academic, hence I keep an open mind about what form Iran's future government may take, including monarchy, republic, or secular democracy. I hope this explains something, although I am not sure what.




Guive Mirfendereski is a professorial lecturer in international relations and law and practices law in Massachusetts.

Comment for The Iranian letters section
Comment to the writer Guive Mirfendereski

By Guive Mirfendereski

Of kings and cylinders
Nothing among Iranians is ever as it seems

Mirfendereski articles' index


Royal blue vs. the rainbow
We don't need HIM to save us
By Naghmeh Sohrabi

Stay away from courtiers
If you want to be regarded as a democrat, act like one
By Setareh Sabety

We are awake
2,500-year celebrations revisited
By Cyrus Kadivar

All are not equal
In the practical world, creating an "aghazadeh" is a human social behavior
By Abdol Hamid Sheybani

Shah bee Shah
When you think "monarchy", "freedom" is not the first thing that comes to mindBy Jahanshah Javid

Dummies for democracy
Stop criticizing. Propose alternative solutions
By Xerxes Darius

All about freedom
... the Pahlavi State was
By Mihandoust

>>> MORE opinion pieces


* Recent

* Covers

* Writers

* Music

* All sections

Copyright © All Rights Reserved. Legal Terms for more information contact:
Web design by BTC Consultants
Internet server Global Publishing Group