Monday
May 28, 2001
Symbol of women's freedom
Hello Dear Mr. Peerooz, ["Must
like your favorite singer?"]
A lady once told me that "The root of many of our problems comes
from the lack of civil discourse." (When I say OUR problems, that includes
you and me too). A basic part of any such discourse is to give reason and
evidence, and not just excuses and alibis. We are on square one again. You
have used baseless and false claims again. I would like to point them out
for you.
1. You and people like you had the same behavior with other Iranians
before. When Saeedi Sirjani went to the US people like you called him jasoos
and just see his tragic end. You did the same thing for Akbar Ganji and
Shamsolvaezin, Mehrangiz Kar,... Now you shed corcodile tears for them and
talk about the injustices behind the walls of Iran's jails. There were some
people abroad who said Daryoush Foruhar and his wife were agents of the
regime then a few years later they were murdered. No need to mention Amir
Entezam. Now it is Googoosh and Kimiaee's turn.
2. Googoosh has had at least six interviews with the Iranian mass media.
(Two in Toronto, three in Stockholm, one in London, one in Paris). If you
mean she does not like to talk to Royalist and Monafeghin, that's something
else.
3. You must accept the fact that she is a symbol for the frustrated and
deprived women in Iran, whether she likes it or not (just see the letter
"I see a
Googoosh in myself" written by a doctor in Iran). Whether it is
to your benefit or not. At a time when a regime asks women to wear the chador
otherwise there will be TOOSARI, her appearance on the stage is a symbol
of the freedom of our women. I don't like to make a goddess of her, but
she had the courage to stay at home at the time of crisis, and I believe
her when she sings about the captive land and the winter time in our city.
4. You absolutely give no evidence about the claim that she has to pay
some people inside the regime for coming abroad and you base your claim
on unfounded rumours. Just give me one simple evidence.
5. The so-called imperialist journals like the Wahington Post
and New York Times have had no interviews with Googoosh whatsoever.
You can simply surf the net and see for yourself. The Washington Post
had and article called (A Gush Over Googoosh) in Aug. 2000 and the New
York Times had two articles about her concert in New York. No interviews
at all.
Yes sir,
You are old-fashioned. In a sense that you still resort to the same mud
slinging which was widespread at the time of Qajars and is now widely used
in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Please please please think hard before
you decide to accuse someone of something and at least give one simple and
small piece of evidence. I think you are dissatisfied because someone else
made large sums of money, that's all.
Ebrahim Majidi
|