TERMS

Who is this Dariush?

Any dictatorial regime can create a thousand parties. They are all worthless when a bunch of them are "farmaayeshi" and the other bunch "baleh ghorbaan goo" and the rest "kissing hands" and all of them for a show to keep people busy, and none of them representing Iran or Iranians. Any dictatorial regime could do this.

Try going to Iran and declaring that you want to establish a secular party that wants someone like Mosadegh to be president. You will be hanged the next day.

Oghdei, go back to the khanevadeye gedaa, bi savaad va tazeh be doraan residat and go back to your old family job of cleaning people's houses and toilets.

only if you are foozoole

The only people who complain about the affluent lifestyles of others are ususally poor degenerates with no education, and no class. In ther words, people like you, Dariush.

Stay out of everyone's business. The truth is no one wants the IRI anymore.

these are the official parties

then their are hundred of semi-official and unoffocial parties that all go on different party lines.

All of them disagree on ALL issues, including the concept of VILAYAT FAQIH.

The reformist coalition (toward the bottom of the list) includes over 5 groups that oppose the rule of faqih and wish to see Khamenei removed.

DID SHAH'S TIME HAVE SUCH DIVERSITY OR JUST ONE PARTY CALLED RASTAKHIZ THAT DIDN'T HAVE A MIND OF THEIR OWN?

Now at least we have political parties that question authority and wish change. Not just follow the King's line.

Ignorance is not a bless in a debate

• Islamic Society of Engineers: secretary-general Mohammad Reza Bahonar

• Combatant Clergy Association: secretary-general Mohammad Reza Mahdavi-Kani

• Islamic Coalition Party : secretary-general Habibollah Asgaroladi

• Association of Islamic Revolution Loyalists : secretary-general Hassan Ghafurifard

• Moderation and Development Party : secretary-general Mohammad Baqer Nobakht

• Coalition of Iran's Independent Volunteers : spokesman Emad Afruq

• Iranian Nation's Welfare Party : secretary-general Khalil Ali Mohammadzadeh

• Fundamentalist groups: lead by Mohammad Taghi Mesbah Yazdi

• Association of Combatant Clerics : secretary-general Mohammad Mousavi Khoeiniha

• Islamic Iran Participation Front : secretary-general Mohsen Mirdamadi

• National Confidence Party : secretary-general Mehdi Karrubi

• Executives of Construction Party : secretary-general Gholamhossein Karbaschi

• Society of Forces Following the Line of the Imam : secretary-general Hadi Khamenei

• Organisation of the Mojahedin of the Islamic Revolution : secretary-general Mohammad Salamati

• Islamic Labour Party : secretary-general Abolqasem Sarhadizadeh

• Workers' House : secretary-general Alireza Mahjub

• Iran Solidarity Party : secretary-general Ebrahim Asgharzadeh

• Youth Party of Iran : secretary-general Mahdi Agha-Alikhani

• Freedom Party of Iran : secretary-general Majid Mohtashami

There are a many groups close to the reformists, but are not allowed to participate in the elections.[citation needed] These include the Freedom Movement Party of Ebrahim Yazdi and the National Religious Forces of Ezzatollah Sahabi.

public affects the public

if you drink, gamble or commit lude acts in public, you are affecting other people. if you drink in public, you are going to act intoxicated to the public. if you allow alcohol in public, you are telling our children that it is okay to drink. if you put casinos in public, you are telling people it is okay to gamble.

do whatever you want in your private lives and leave us alone. and by us, i mean the majority of Iran who is still religious and traditional. we don't want your vatanforoosh western lifestyles. We created Tehran for you, stay there. haha

Tazi lover...

Typical for a IRI apologist, you are comparing apples to oranges.  What types of political parties??  All these supposed "multiple parties" you claim have one thing in common: HEZBOLLAHI.  Your minders do not allow any political party that has a differing political agenda that their mindless and corrupt views.  If a differing political party does pop up on the radar, its followers will be arrested on trumped up charges and thrown in jail for 5-10 years.  You have been exposed AGAIN.  

JACKASS! 

HOW STUPID CAN YOU BE?

Olaagh

Who the hell are you to proclaim yourself any type of moral authority on anyone else?

If private matters become public it is only because of foozoole-baazi from people like you with empty lives.

Who the hell are you to delineate between what is sinful and what isn't?

You don't want to drink? Don't drink. You don't want to gamble? Don't gamble. How ignorant can one person be? (In your case, the factor grows exponentially by the hour).

If alcohol is wrong, if gambling is wrong, then it's wrong whether in public or private.

Who the hell do you mean by WE? Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Otherwise, you are all alone.

Do you know how to read? Or just write?

Ablah, did you read what I wrote?

I said the IRI is much more democratic, and politically free'er than the Shah's regime. As Collin Powell said, Iran experiences COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS (which cannot even be found in some liberal democracies anymore).

No one is claiming the IRI is a "liberal democracy" nor would I advocate for such a thing. It is not the beacon of "western" freedoms, etc.

However, if you compare it with the Shah's regime, it is much MORE democratic (not necessarily DEMOCRATIC, but MORE democratic) and much politically free'er. Yes, socially it is more restrictive, but I would say more parties are going down in Iran than pre-1979.

Dariush EXPOSED...AGAIN!

If you believe that the IRI is a truly democratic entity, its roshan-fekr leaders are elected by the people through a fair and balanced election, it provides more freedoms to its inmates today than before 1979, and is truly wanted by the MAJORITY of Iranians, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you - it is a great investment!!

Get a clue JACKASS!  

IRAN ALREADY HAS THAT

1) Iran already gives the privacy for people to drink in their own homes. If they are caught selling it in the public, that is where the problem arises.

2) Iran doesn't go into people's bedrooms. But if adultary is made public (where someone has someone elses child while married to someone else), and it becomes public knowledge, the PUBLIC has a right to punish the adulterer. We are NOT animals to just sleep around with everyone.

4) People already gamble in their PRIVATE lives. But don't bring it in the PUBLIC. the IRI doesnt' raid people's homes and stop them from gambling. But we don't want it like the Shah's time where casinos were a common feature of Tehran night life. WE DON'T WANT THAT IN THE PUBLIC.

Again, what people do in PRIVATE remains PRIVATE. But stop trying to impose your SINFUL lifestyle on the PUBLIC and the citizens who don't want to put up with it.

As for everyone else, the IRI already allows it in the private sphere. So why do we need regime change? Cuz you felt like it?

YES THAT"S WHAT IRAN WANTS

Arab Parast

1. If someone wants to drink....it's none of your business.

2. Keep your nose out of other people's bedrooms. You have no moral authority over anyone in this or any other world, in this or any othe lifetime. You have the audacity to impose your Arabist morality while the mollahs you worship have a stable full of European and Asian whores at their disposal.

3. Again, be tow cheh? Just because you haven't seen a vagina since you came out of one doesn't entitle you to pass judgement.

4. Gambling is a part of life in Iran, anywhere you see a backgammon board.

5. I realize your sensitive constitution precludes you from seeing a female without spontaneously staining your underwear. No one is advocating public nudity, Mr. Ignorant. You complain about people's choice of language. Why don't you exercise similar restraint when in the presence of a woman and not ogle her like some pervert?

Creativity not a subject you are good at?

Did you skip those elementary school classes on creativity? It seems you use the same title over and over again? Maybe its your way of doing Zikr (repeating something over and over again, until you convince yourself of it).

Yes, we go back to the exact point that I knew all of you were making. You want more "FREEDOM" in Iran. But it isn't political freedom you speak of, even though you lie to do the world by pointing to the lack of certain political freedoms in Iran. You point to the IRI's political flaws, even though the Shah's political flaws were much greater, but you want the satanic freedoms for Iran that other countries like to get rid of.

You want Iran to have the freedom to:

1) Drink alchohol openly without getting in trouble (even though now Western countries have made laws against drinking alcohol openly)

2) Sleep around and cheat on their wives without fearing punishment (that is seriously what it comes down to)

3) Dating and having sex before marriage, even if it means hurting hundreds of girls, impregnating thousands (and then you will ask for the freedom of unconditional abortion....a woman's choice, eh?)

4) Gamling districts in Tehran, where people openly lose their life savings so that a few mafia people can get rich

5) And lets not forget the freedom to see women half naked on the street (thats seriously what you are asking our women to do...have the freedom to show what they've got....so you men can treat them like sex objects)

FREEEEEEEDOM to you is CORRUPTION to me and millions of other IRANIANS

What people in iran want is POLITICAL FREEDOM.....which the IRI is far better than the Shah's regime. The other 5 freedoms I mentioned above....the people already have in the privacy of their own homes now. They don't need regime change for that.

Dariush EXPOSED

Dariush agha zadeh in yet another attempt to deceive tells me: "You are saying the shah's rastakhiz party which tolerated no opposition, ...., is the same as Iran's political system that has over 120 legal and over 400 ...."

I invite all readers to read my comments and find a single reference to me (Rostam) saying any of the above.

Dariush in his desperation now is reverting to baseless accounts on my behalf. Dariush, Dariush, what shall be done about you Dariush? YOU ARE EXPOSED.

As opposed to the Shah's regime as I or anyone else may be, I must still say that under the Shah people enjoyed a whole lot more FREEDOM than under the IRI. You see Dariush aghaa zadeh, there are many different types of freedom. And here is where you are exposed. There is political freedom, then there is social freedom, then there is economical freedom, the list goes on. Under the IRI the people don't have even their basic social rights, eg what religion to have (Bahais case in point) or what to wear. And economically, the corrupt IRI mahsalah hezaar mashalah daste hezaar faamile zamaane Pahlavi ro ham az posht basteh.

So, no Darisuh, overall the current regime is not more democratic than the past regime. They are more authotarian, period. YOU ARE EXPOSED Dariush. Your attempts to deceive has failed (again.)

Raztakhiz!

You are saying the shah's rastakhiz party which tolerated no opposition, or even different SHADES of differences, is the same as Iran's political system that has over 120 legal and over 400 unofficial political parties that disagree on almost every single issue (even on the issue of wither Iran should have a FAQIH or not)????

You do realize that Reza Khatami's political party says we must abolish VILAYAT FAQIH and they operate political parties that put members in parliament?

Shah only tolerated 1 political party, and if they disagreed with him, they ended in SAVAK's prisons.

I am sorry to say, but Iran's current system is MUCH MORE democratic than Shah's dictatorship. Even Collin Powell has said that Iran has a semi-democracy, something you could NOT say about the Shah's regime.

Dariush Exposed... Again...

Dariush with his trademark "eshveh" says "by the very fact that you said "rastakhiz then, hezbollah now" shows how ignorant you are of the current political system and the number of parties that are active in iran."

Dariush, Aghaa zadeh. All those parties are "farmaayeshi" and boil down to puppets of IRI. Iranians are not stupid. Don't insult us. They are all Hezbollahs under different colors and that does not fool us.

Dariush YOU ARE EXPOSED SO BADLY.

ignorance

by the very fact that you said "rastakhiz then, hezbollah now" shows how ignorant you are of the current political system and the number of parties that are active in iran.

"javabeh ablahan khamoosheest" (the answer to idiots is silence)

Re: Flag of Shah... Dariush Exposed (Again...)

Dariushe Aghaa zadeh with his tardemark "eshveh" wrote the following: (my comments are in parenthesis): 

Flag of Shah represents:

2,500 years of dictatorship (by the mullahs more than the the kings)

A lion and sword represents aggressiveness and arrogance (it is IRI that is agressive and arrogant, but still thanks god the IRI has not dirtied the Lion and Sword by using it.)

corruption (rafsanjani?)

drug use by royal family (at least it was the royal family, today thanks to the IRI it is millions of our young that use drug)

torture by SAVAK  (now SAVAMA. Dariush must like the rhyme of the word better)

Enslavement by colonial and imperial powers (which turned out it was MUCH better than enslavement by the Islamists.)

Toosareekhor of our people (Today it is IRI that is "toosari zan" of our poeple)

One party system, RASTAKHIZ (now hezboallah)

And a DEAD SHAH. Alhamdulellah. (and soon a dead IRI. alhamdulah)

Dariush it is so much fun to expose you. 

Rostam

RE: Militant thug

Aryamehr,

Dariush a militant thug? Let's agree on the fact that he is just a "bacheh akhoonde" "shekam gondeh" enjoying his miserable worthless life in the US, while Iranians are suffering at home.

Rostam

Flag of Shah

Flag of Shah represents:

2,500 years of dictatorship

A lion and sword represents aggressiveness and arrogance

corruption

drug use by royal family

torture by SAVAK

Enslavement by colonial and imperial powers

Toosareekhor of our people

One party system, RASTAKHIZ

 And a DEAD SHAH. Alhamdulellah.

You are decieving people

Yes, no denying the fact that the shah did push a lot of literacy on an illiterate population. But the fact remains that the Shah could not do much in pushing for female literacy because of his attack on traditional and religious sensabilities. It is Imam Khomeini that convinced the traditional and religious classes to bring their daughters to be educated, something the Shah would never have had the authority to do.

Also, while due credit is given to the Shah for educating people in the main cities, the IRI pushed education in the remote villages and isolated towns. It pushed doctors and nurses into those regions and brought the mortality rate down (mortality rate refers to the number of children that die in the first couple of months after birth).

Maybe the Shah could have done the same over time, but we can't claim the IRI hasn't served the people in these regards. If the IRI had not done these, you guys would be sitting here COMPLAINING ABOUT IT. But since it has, you are DECEIVING people by claiming the shah would have probably done the same (however, I would claim he never had the religious authority to convince traditional and religious families of certain things)

democratic?

I'm judging the level of democracy. I never claimed the IRI was a "liberal democracy" but it is definately MORE democratic than the Shah's regime. By many standards (more freedom of press, more political participation, an actual COMPETITIVE election, etc.) I'm not claiming its anywhere near a liberal democracy, but if we are comparing it with the "Shah", then I am saying that it is an OBVIOUS fact that the IRI is more democratic.

Shah more democratic?

Are you claiming the IRI is less democratic than the Shah? Yes or no?

Saddam and Shah were both western puppets

Why would Saddam dare attack the Shah? Because Saddam and the Shah were both installed in power by the CIA. They worked for the same master. The second the Shah was overthrown, Saddam was told by his masters (remember that famous handshake with Rumsfeld) to attack the IRI to regain control of Iran under WESTERN CONTROL.

It is YOU that is exposed ROSTAM.

Re: King of deception

Well said Rostam!  However, I will warn you that this militant thug will come back at you, after his 6th prayer of the day, quoting some verse from the Quran which states how much of a jackass he and his band of thugs truly are.  LOL.  Abadi, you have been exposed AGAIN! 

King of deception # 3

I shall expose Mr Dariush in this reply yet again. Deceivers must be exposed. Mr. Daruish claims that "Israel has only 1/100th the influence Iran has in the region right now." I claim this figure is wrong. It is not 1/100 but it is 1/75. Err... Maybe 5/173? The exact mathematical figure that Mr. Dariush is using is a DECEPTION. Mr. Dariush says " international and US National newspapers all label Iran as either an emerging regional superpower". A super power? A superpower that sells its oil only to buy it back more expensively in form of gasoline? The whole world is labeling Iran as "the laughing stock" of the planet thanks to the incompetence of IRI. Dariush says "Iran is still scientifically far ahead than all of them and publishes more books than all the Arab and Turkic states combined" Stats Mr Dariush, where did you get your self invented figures??? YOU ARE EXPOSED. Dariush says: "It is sad that you want to return to a time when Iran sides with the oppressors of the world (Israel, US, Britain), rather than stand up for itself and be praised by the world’s oppressed." Yes, Mr. Dariush, not only him but also me and many other Iranians today rather side with these so called oppressors than to be praised by the oppressed people of the world BUT have some of the highest prostitution, child trade, drug addiction, poverty and pyschological depression in the world. Yes, Mr. Dariush, YOU ARE EXPOSED YET AGAIN. Mr. Dariush says "The Shah's son would have become the Shah without the people having a choice. However, neither Khomeini's son, nor Khamenei's son can become the next leader of Iran (unless the people through the Assembly of Experts chose it that way)". You see dear reader, he is not lying, he is only deceiving which is worst than lying, for one may ask: Ok, LET'S FORGET ABOUT THE SONS, let's talk about the fathers... Now who chose Khomeini or now Khamenei to be the "supreme leader for life" who has powers equaling a Shah??? YOU ARE EXPOSED MR. DARIUSH, AGAIN. Dariush, you may answer: but it was the assembly of experts who made that vote. I shall expose you again. Assembly of who? Experts? My my... what a decpetive word... Experts? Expert in what? experts in "bool va ghaez va nejaasat tamiz kardan"??? EXPOSED... Dariush says "Shah had 2 political parties, the "Yes party" and the "Yes sir party". Then it just became the Rastakhiz party". Well... What do we have today? The "kiss ass" and the "ghaaratgar" parties? who joined together and became the "hezbollah"? Dariush, I really am tired of exposing you. The big question is who are you? how can you live with yourself when thanks to the goverment you support and thanks to its lackeys like yourself, so many people must suffer so greatly? Rostam

King of deception # 2

I am here to expose Mr. Dariush yet again. Dariush says: "The Shah's economy was no more than the Shah purchasing military toys from the US master..." No one disputes the fact that Shah spend a lot of money for military toys. But that was to stop predators like Sadam. It worked for 3 decades when we had no wars and were at peace with our neighbors. But the fact is that the IRI ALSO spent a lot of money for military in the war with Iraq. As a matter of fact a whole lot more than the Shah did, and it included purchases from the US and Israel among other countries. It also cost millions of lives. Hmmm... let's review: The Shah spends money on military, the IRI spends money on military. We have peace with our neighbors under the Shah, we have war and death under the IRI. Dariush I REALLY am tired of exposing you. Knowing the likes of Dariush, he may protest and say: "But it was Sadam that attacked Iran and he was encouraged by the west, and....". More futile attempts to deceive. How come Sadam wouldn't dare attack Iran under the Pahlavis? Dariush had already provided the answer when he said "The Shah purchased military toys..." I am not pro-Shah, but I just have to expose Dariush's deceptions. If this means I have to defend the poor old Shah's regime when compared to the "lajan" that IRI is, then so be it. Dariush says: "The Shah's economy was no more than the Shah purchasing military toys..." No Dariush. The past regime's ecomomy was more than that. At least we had the largest oil refinary in Abadan and the foundation for the petrochemical industries had already been laid. Today Iran, the second largest oil producer of the world, is importing its gasoline from other countries for crying out loud. You call that good ecomony? Also, remember those nuclear plants built in southern Iran? The buildings still stand today you know. Unfortunately, they were left incomplete after the revolution. We would have had nuclear energy without all of today's fuss and hoopla by 1984, that's TWENTY FIVE years ago. YOUR DECEPTIONS ARE EXPOSED YET AGAIN, Mr. Dariush. Only if I and the likes of me were more intelligent back then in 1978, we would have put you and your IRI in its place before it was even conceived. One more note. I know my writing sounds as though I am talking to Dariush, but in fact I am not. I am just hoping to expose him. There is no reason to talk with a pro-IRI, pro-stoning backwarded savage who is not even living in Iran. I have a couple of friends with dismembered limbs due to the Iraq war. They volunteered for that war because they were deceived by the likes of Daiush. They think differently today tough. Today they know exactly what was going on. I can only imagine what they would do with Dariush or any other IRI lackey, if they could be left alone in a locked room with him. The thought of it makes me uncomfortable. Rostam

King of deceptions # 1

FIRST, I am not pro-X or anti-X (except for IRI, I am definetely anti-IRI.) But I do give due credit to the IRI, or the Shah, or anyone else when it is backed by the truth. However, I hate nothing more than deceptions. They are worst than lies. It was deception that drew me to the streets in 1978 to join the revolution, and made me RESPONSIBLE for my share for the misery that exists in Iran today. Mr Daruish is NOT liying in his remarks, BUT he is DECEIVING a great deal. He uses tried and proven similar deception tactics used to deceive me and the likes of me 30 years ago. I feel responsible for answering to them. So here we go... Let's just take one example: "BIG" (but clever) deception: iliteracy is less than the previous regime. You see Mr. Dariush is not lying, he is DECEIVING. There is a big difference between the two. I, a previously deceived person who has learnt his lesson, shall expose Mr. Dariush: Iliteracy. What did we have under the Shah in 1948? Thirty years before the revolution? The iliteracy was 95 percent. With the limited small resources that were available, the effort for the literacy of the coutrny began. Most of this resource was spent for the younger generation. What did we have in 1978, thirty years later? of the 14 millions (boys and girls) between the ages of 7 and 18, 12 millions of them were in schools. That's about 85 percent. These stats are available even TODAY, at the IRI's dept of education. It was this latter group that grew older and today are 37+ years old. THAT's why the 40+ years old population is more literate than say Turkey. It was the previous regime's effort that allowed this. Where would we be today if the Pahlavis stayed in power? You can first of all bet that there would be millions more ALIVE to be literate. I am referring to those killed by imaam Zahaak in the worthless war with Iraq. Second, the literacy not only would be highter, BUT ALSO, all of the higher/university educated Iranians would be working IN Iran and serving their country, instead of in foreign countries. Iran would be so much more prosperous. There Mr. Daruish. I exposed you again. By comparing Iran under Pahlavi of THIRTY years ago with Iran under IRI today, you attempted to DECEIVE the readers. But you stand exposed. Rostam

King of deception # 3

I am here to expose Mr. Dariush yet again.

Dariush says: "The Shah's economy was no more than the Shah purchasing military toys from the US master..."

No one disputes the fact that Shah spend a lot of money for military toys. But that was to stop predators like Sadam. It worked for 3 decades when we had no wars and were at peace with our neighbors. But the fact is that the IRI ALSO spent a lot of money for military in the war with Iraq. As a matter of fact a whole lot more than the Shah did, and it included purchases from the US and Israel among other countries. It also cost millions of lives. Hmmm... let's review:

The Shah spends money on military, the IRI spends money on military. We have peace with our neighbors under the Shah, we have war and death under the IRI. Dariush I REALLY am tired of exposing you.

Knowing the likes of Dariush, he may protest and say: "But it was Sadam that attacked Iran and he was encouraged by the west, and....". More futile attempts to deceive. How come Sadam wouldn't dare attack Iran under the Pahlavis? Dariush had already provided the answer when he said "The Shah purchased military toys..."

I am not pro-Shah, but I just have to expose Dariush's deceptions. If this means I have to defend the poor old Shah's regime when compared to the "lajan" that IRI is, then so be it. 

Dariush says: "The Shah's economy was no more than the Shah purchasing military toys..." No Dariush. The past regime's ecomomy was more than that. At least we had the largest oil refinary in Abadan and the foundation for the petrochemical industries had already been laid. Today Iran, the second largest oil producer of the world, is importing its gasoline from other countries for crying out loud. You call that good ecomony? Also, remember those nuclear plants built in southern Iran? The buildings still stand today you know. Unfortunately, they were left incomplete after the revolution. We would have had nuclear energy without all of today's fuss and hoopla by 1984, that's TWENTY FIVE years ago.

YOUR DECEPTIONS ARE EXPOSED YET AGAIN, Mr. Dariush. Only if I and the likes of me were more intelligent back then in 1978, we would have put you and your IRI in its place before it was even conceived.

One more note. I know my writing sounds as though I am talking to Dariush, but in fact I am not. I am just hoping to expose him. There is no reason to talk with a pro-IRI, pro-stoning backwarded savage who is not even living in Iran. I have a couple of friends with dismembered limbs due to the Iraq war. They volunteered for that war because they were deceived by the likes of Daiush. They think differently today tough. Today they know exactly what was going on. I can only imagine what they would do with Dariush or any other IRI lackey, if they could be left alone in a locked room with him. The thought of it makes me uncomfortable.

Rostam

Abadi...

You might want to take your head out of your ass long enough to realize that the flag of the Islamic Republic represents:

Murder
Corruption
Stoning
Terrorism
Backwardness
Prostitution
Death
War
Hezbollah
Economic hardship
International embarrassment
Slavery
Deception

And lastly, the flag of the Islamic Republic represents that charlatan, your mentor, Khomeini

How can YOU live with yourself?? JACKASS!

King of deceptions... # 2....

I shall expose Mr Dariush in this reply yet again. Deceivers must be exposed.

Mr. Daruish claims that "Israel has only 1/100th the influence Iran has in the region right now." I claim this figure is wrong. It is not 1/100 but it is 1/75. Err... Maybe 5/173? The exact mathematical figure that Mr. Dariush is using is a DECEPTION.

Mr. Dariush says " international and US National newspapers all label Iran as either an emerging regional superpower". A super power? A superpower that sells its oil only to buy it back more expensively in form of gasoline?

The whole world is labeling Iran as "the laughing stock" of the planet thanks to the incompetence of IRI.

Dariush says "Iran is still scientifically far ahead than all of them and publishes more books than all the Arab and Turkic states combined" Stats Mr Dariush, where did you get your self invented figures??? YOU ARE EXPOSED.

Dariush says: "It is sad that you want to return to a time when Iran sides with the oppressors of the world (Israel, US, Britain), rather than stand up for itself and be praised by the world’s oppressed."
Yes, Mr. Dariush, not only him but also me and many other Iranians today rather side with these so called oppressors than to be praised by the oppressed people of the world BUT have some of the highest prostitution, child trade, drug addiction, poverty and pyschological depression in the world. Yes, Mr. Dariush, YOU ARE EXPOSED YET AGAIN.

Mr. Dariush says "The Shah's son would have become the Shah without the people having a choice. However, neither Khomeini's son, nor Khamenei's son can become the next leader of Iran (unless the people through the Assembly of Experts chose it that way)". You see dear reader, he is not lying, he is only deceiving which is worst than lying, for one may ask: Ok, LET'S FORGET ABOUT THE SONS, let's talk about the fathers... Now who chose Khomeini or now Khamenei to be the "supreme leader for life" who has powers equaling a Shah??? YOU ARE EXPOSED MR. DARIUSH, AGAIN.

Dariush, you may answer: but it was the assembly of experts who made that vote. I shall expose you again. Assembly of who? Experts? My my... what a decpetive word... Experts? Expert in what? experts in "bool va ghaez va nejaasat tamiz kardan"??? EXPOSED...

Dariush says "Shah had 2 political parties, the "Yes party" and the "Yes sir party". Then it just became the Rastakhiz party". Well... What do we have today? The "kiss ass" and the "ghaaratgar" parties? who joined together and became the "hezbollah"? Dariush, I really am tired of exposing you.
The big question is who are you? how can you live with yourself when thanks to the goverment you support and thanks to its lackeys like yourself, so many people must suffer so greatly?

Rostam