Chapter One (Chapter Two)
By Way of Introduction
At Harvard Law School, March 2006
In March 2006, the Harvard Gazette featured a story about a symposium on Iran and the future of non-proliferation regime at Harvard Law School, adorned by a color photo of three of the four speakers. They were, Matthew Bunn, the director of Kennedy School of Government’s program on “Managing the Atom,” an M.I.T. political science professor, Barry Posen, and Flynt Leverett, a former White House national security advisor. Somehow missing from the photo was the speaker identified by the event’s oversized poster as Director of NGO, Global Interfaith Peace, and former advisor to Iran’s nuclear negotiation team, Kaveh Afrasiabi, me.
Any one else may have taken issue with the Harvard paper, perhaps wondering if this were a mere case of pure neglect, or photographer’s or editor’s unfriendly choice to exclude me, but by then I was rather used to such discrepant treatments at Harvard, so I chose not to pick up the phone and inquire as to the real sources of this oddity – about a high profile event that had been sponsored by a number of programs at Harvard Law School as well as Center For International Affairs and the Belfer Center For International Relations at the Kennedy School, and was podcast live on the internet.
That oddity grew by leaps and bounds however, when I received a communication via e-mail from the chief of Harvard University Police Department, Francis Riley, informing me of the following: “Dear Mr. Afrasiabi: This is to inform you that there is a trespass order against you and you are barred from entering the campus or any property belonging to Harvard University and if you do so you will be subject to arrest.” That came on March 19th.
”What did you say at the lecture to cause this?” Mike Wallace my old friend at CBS’ “60 Minutes” reacted half-jokingly after I forwarded Riley’s email and attached the file on the symposium, “I thought your troubles at Harvard were over.” Obviously not.
“Bizarre, absolutely preposterous,” reacted more harshly another friend, Noam Chomsky, after I wrote to him that I was baffled how I could one day be a keynote speaker at a university-wide symposium and then the next day banned and threatened with arrest if I stepped foot inside not only Harvard but any property that Harvard owned, even those that the university did not occupy and had leased out throughout Cambridge and beyond?!
But, Wallace and Chomsky were not the only ones expressing their surprise, at the fact that one day Harvard would roll out the red carpet for me and then the next day ban me; several faculty at the Kennedy School of Government – Joseph Nye, Stephen Walt, Steven Miller, Matthew Bunn, and Graham Allison – also showed their support for me by sending emails to the higher ups at Harvard. “Afrasiabi has made serious contribution in the area of Iran studies,” Nye’s email to the Dean at the Kennedy School read in parts. Yet, somehow, all their effort came to naught and that meant I could no longer be a part of the Harvard program on nuclear non-proliferation as I had been for the past six months. “I am sorry Kaveh, we did all we could and even had a meeting with the Dean, but looks like you have powerful enemies at Harvard and they prevailed,” Nye told me when I went to his office and I aired my frustration at the unfair and cruel mistreatment displayed toward me at Harvard.
At Holyoke Center, July 2006
After several months of reluctantly complying with the strict orders of police chief Riley, right after the July 4th celebration, when one gets a heavy dosage of American ideology about liberty and the pursuit of happiness, I felt it was safe to engage in a minor transgression by venturing inside the building at Harvard Square known as the Holyoke Center and purchase a book at the bookstore of Harvard University Press. That was not to be, for I was in the middle of transaction with the cashier when a somber voice from behind calling my name froze me. It was a Harvard campus police officer in his mid 30s; he politely took me a corner and asked what my name was and when I answered he turned around and whispered in his walki talki nodding his head. “Okay, will do,” he said after receiving instruction.
“You can’t be here. You must leave this premise immediately or I have orders to arrest you?” He ordered me.
”Arrest me, for what? I am here to buy a book?”
”You can buy it somewhere else,” the officer replied.
“I can’t,” I said and then pointed at the book, titled Islam and Ecology, “this is published by Harvard University Press and this is the only place where they sell them.”
”Sorry not my business. You can order it online, can’t you?” He asked with a tone conveying impatient smarts.
“I suppose I could,” I answered, “but then I couldn’t get the discount.”
The officer was tiny bit puzzled and I let the middle age cashier witnessing this unexpected conversation furnish the explanation. “You see. He is one of the authors of this book, gets twenty percent discount.”
”I see,” he said and then firmly pointed me toward the door, “sorry I’ve got my orders. You either leave now or I have to arrest you for trespassing, the choice is yours.” I chose freedom instead. After all, I had a distinct sense of de ja vu about this: a few years back, I had been stopped at the steps of Harvard’s Divinity library by a Harvard guard who escorted me out to the street without the slightest listening to my explanation that I was on my way to pick up Harvard Theological Review, which had published my article on post-modern Christian theology. At least I was able to get inside Harvard intellectually even if I couldn’t physically. Well, life is full of paradoxes.
On CNN, September 2006
Irrespective of the no-trespass order and the less than pleasant experience at the Holyoke Center, I found myself defending Harvard – in the opinion page of Boston Globe and on CNN-affiliate program hosted by Glen Beck. The issue at question was whether or not Iran’s former president, Mohammad Khatami, had the right to give a public lecture at Harvard (on the subject of “ethics of tolerance in the age of violence”). The wealth of voices opposed to Khatami’s presence at Harvard included a number of local and national pundits, as well as the Massachusetts governor, Mitt Romney, who had attracted national attention by refusing to provide state security for the visiting Khatami, who had been at the United Nations prior to coming to Boston in light of his appointment by the UN Secretary General, Kofi Anan, as a distinguished member of an “Alliance of Civilizations.”
A few days earlier, in my opinion column in Boston Globe, titled “Governor’s got it wrong on Khatami,” I had defended Harvard’s decision to invite Khatami and had pointed out that whatever his shortcomings, the moderate Iranian ex-president was nonetheless the founder of the idea of “dialogue among civilizations” and a globally-respected voice for tolerance, listening, and reciprocity.
Beck, the right-wing host of the CNN’s Headline News talk show, would have none of that and sarcastically referred to me alternatively as “former Harvard scholar,” “former associate of president Khatami” and also “Khatami boy” and went on a rampage against Iran’s bloodthirsty mullahs and so on, without letting me a moment’s time to respond without constantly cutting me off rudely. Finally I had it and interrupted him and said, “you don’t let me talk. If you want to do all the talking, why bother inviting guests to your program.” Beck was unprepared for this, paused for a moment and then with a nervous grin responded, “you’re right, thank you for coming, good bye.” I instantly wondered what his reaction would be if I told his global audience that I myself was banned from Harvard, and that the mighty Harvard was guilty of a serious violation of my human rights, as far as I was concerned no less serious than the serious transgressions that Beck was vilifying the “Islamofascists” for.
“What an irony?” Mike Wallace, whom I had alerted about my appearance on the Beck show, loudly wondered on the phone a few days later, “you would think they’d learn by now!” I didn’t bother asking him what he meant by learn? Did he mean manners, respect for others, respect for human rights? I didn’t because the answer was self-evident.
Too bad for Beck though. His bosses at CNN headquarter subsequently reviewed the tape after receiving a formal complaint from me and found in my favor, informing me in their letter that they regretted the fact that I was not given adequate time to express my point of view and that they found the behavior of Mr. Beck “unacceptable.”
Next day at Harvard’s Kennedy School
Somehow I had deluded myself into thinking that being on the very short list of Mr. Khatami’s own guests at his much-anticipated talk would suffice to get around the no-trespass order, not to mention all the pro-Harvard rallying that I had managed the preceding days on the (inter)national media and in the oped page of Boston Globe. My dear friend and colleague, Abbas Maleki, who was a visiting research fellow at the Kennedy School and a principal organizers of Khatami’s talk, approached me on the steps of the building and with a sad voice said, “I am very sorry Kaveh. But they objected to your name on the list.” “Who is they?” “The Harvard police. I am very sorry.” “That’s ok, don’t worry about it. I have seen a lot worse things from them than this, trust me.” Maleki saw that I was genuinely sad and patted me on the shoulder and said, “but you’ve got your interview with him in a couple of hours, and you will be at the private reception on Beacon Hill, so don’t mind those people.”
He was right. So, instead of attending Khatami’s lecture, I went to a nearby café and prepared my interview with Khatami, that took place at Khatami’s hotel room at Charles Hotel and subsequently appeared in UN Chronicle.
I had known Khatami from my days of helping with the UN’s program on Dialogue Among Civilizations in 2000-2001, which has been initiated by Khatami at his UN speech in 1999. In addition to assisting the UN’s Representative on Dialogue, Giandomenico Picco, on organizing various conferences around the world on this subject, including one in New York, another in Tokyo, another in Caracas, etc., I had also been the chairman of the week-long World Youth Festival on Dialogue Among Civilizations, which took place in Vilnius, Lithuania, in Summer 2000, a lovely and enchanting event that brought together hundreds of young people from some 66 countries, mostly from Africa, for the purpose of cross-cultural understanding. Not only that, I had traveled with Khatami to Berlin, Madrid, and Asghabad, Turkmenistan, in my capacity as an unofficial observer, often publishing the results of each trip on a popular Iranian website, www.payvand.com.
“So. What did you think of the lecture?” Mr. Khatami asked me and I simply said, “wonderful, very enlightening” thus hiding the fact that I was not able to hear him. But I had previewed the text of his speech and my comment was not entirely disingenuous.
In comparison, making it the lovely home of Olga Davidson, an avid collector of Iranian art, was not entirely problem-free and I was informed by an aide to Khatami that there had been “objections” to my invitation and a number of people at Harvard had bluntly said that they would not go if I showed up. This conversation grabbed the attention of Khatami and he told his aide, “it’s their choice. If they don’t want to, that’s their choice.” I was truly humbled by his stern reaction, though at the same instant tried to imagine the wide faces of those snobby Harvardites who had blacklisted me for years and now were being rebuffed by none other than a former president of Iran.
The small crowd at Davidson’s multiplex apartment included one of Harvard’s cronies who taught at Boston College, a psychology professor by the name of Ali Banuazizi, who had dutifully performed his duty on behalf of my adversaries at Harvard by denying my complaint against them to the Ethics Committee of a professional association, the Middle East Studies Association. A couple of years earlier, in my civil right law suit against Harvard, I had taken the deposition of Banuazizi and he had stated under oath that he had excused himself from the ethics committee because he felt “uncomfortable since I knew both you and the others at Harvard.” But, after discovery from that association, I had come to learn that it was a lie and the respected professor Banuazizi had cast a negative vote against my complaint. I had remained silent about this until at the plush buffet dinner that night, when I approached him standing next to his wife and after exchanging the usual niceties said to him, “by the way I inquired from the ethics committee and found out that you lied in your deposition. You didn’t excuse yourself from my case, did you? ” Banuazizi was speechless and I turned around and left his company before he had a chance to come up with more duplicitous lies to whitewash his complicity with the regime of repression imposed on me by my powerful enemies at Harvard who had done their best to destroy my chances in the academia and beyond. My only consolation was that I had single handedly taken them to court, a jury trial in a federal court, then to the appeals court, and all the way to the altars of the United States Supreme Court.
“Don’t worry Kaveh. You will always be the man who took Harvard to the US Supreme Court,” my friend and one-time doctoral dissertation advisor, historian Howard Zinn, once told me, informing me that as far as he knew that has never happened before in Harvard’s 300 plus years history. Well, that’s something to be proud of, even though it does not quite cover the bills, and irrespective of the magnitude of sacrifice and pain, particularly of the bias, discrimination, and double standards of not only the mighty liberal institution but also the great American justice system, that despite its sound and fury about equal justice, simply could not deliver whenever push came to shove in my long, lonely legal battle with the Goliath also known as the Beacon on the Hill >>> Chapter Two
Recently by Kaveh Afrasiabi | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Reading Kafka at Harvard (7) | 4 | Dec 20, 2008 |
Reading Kafka at Harvard (6) | 14 | Dec 13, 2008 |
Reading Kafka at Harvard (5) | 16 | Dec 06, 2008 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
silence of the Iranian lambs
by mahnazi on Sun Nov 23, 2008 04:32 PM PSTThis reminds of the movie, silence of the lambs, the lambs of course being our high brow academics like professor Banuazizi who apparently betrayed Afrasiabi because they cater to the people with influence. That is not right and they should apologize to him. That being said, I hope Afrasiabi explains in the next chapters why he chose this title for his book because based on my limited knowledge of Kafka the severety of what Harvard has done wrong to him has to be much worse in order to fit the title. Otherwise it would be a misnomer. But after going over his huge list of publications in his extremely impressive wikepedia I bet that is the case.
M. Aliabadi Los Angeles
In Defense of Principle
by Ardeshir Ommani on Sun Nov 23, 2008 02:50 PM PSTIndependence and Sovereignty
Dear Kaveh,
With no exaggeration, your many years battle against Harvard University (Corporation) shows your stamina, determination and above all your commitment to the principles you consider to be true.
Upholding principles, a rare commodity in America's "free market" place of ideas is not easy, especially for those whose goal is to become careerists, rather than fighting for truth or justice. In the 1960's when the national liberation and class struggles around the world were in full swing, some Iranian intellectuals, often coming from the upper classes in Iran, prided themselves with having knowledge of theories in defense of the cause of the working class, and the fight for justice.
However, by the end of the Vietnam War, during the rise of Reaganism, relative improvement in the economy of the U.S., and with the downfall of the Soviet Union, many Iranians, Ali Banuazizi among them, abandoned those ideals and succumbed to the pursuit of personal achievement within the establishment. By then, upholding principles had become "passe" for him and other individuals in this group.
It is in the nature of the higher educational institutions (especially ones like Harvard) to mold the conscience of the academics in attendance, to serve the interests of the status quo, and filter out all those voices who question its legitimacy.
But take heart, Kaveh, because as we all know, truth has a way of finding itself in history, and those who work for maintaining the system as is, simply become a part of its ossification. I proudly acknowledge your arduous journey, your principled battle all the way up to the Supreme Court, and the intellectual honesty you have demonstrated. It is an honor for me to be on the side of an Iranian intellectual who has chosen to defend the rights of the Iranian people. American Iranian Friendship Committee (AIFC) wishes you continued success in this journey and we look forward to reading the next chapter. P.S. We love your title!
Ardeshir Ommani, co-founder, AIFC
Unconvincing
by Faramarz2004 (not verified) on Sun Nov 23, 2008 01:25 PM PSTDr. Afrasiabi
A scholar who has lent his services to the Islamic Republic (one of the cruelest regimes on Earth) cannot claim to be a detached and unbaised analyst of present-day Iran. Even if Harvard was wrong (a big IF, since we do not know the exact circumstances that led to your being banned from the campus), it is nothing compared to the many indignities that are inflicted on thousands of students in Iran. Khatami himself has blood on his hands, since he served this regime loyally for decades and vocally attacked the students (his own supporters) who came out to protest in 1999.
Incidentally, what exactly led to this restraining order against you?
For Lost in Oxford
by Ari Siletz on Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:54 PM PSTKafka?
by Lost In Oxford (not verified) on Sat Nov 22, 2008 01:50 PM PSTCan someone tell me, what does the title of the article, “Reading KAFKA at Harvard” is supposed to mean in regard to what’s going on in the article?
Thanks,
MESA double standard on academic freedom
by tavasol (not verified) on Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:26 AM PSTI am attending the annual conference of Middle East Studies Association in D.C. and I came upon this horrible account of MESA double standards last night and could not help compare it to all the noise that MESA committee on academic freedom is making about abuse of rights in Egypt and Iran. How come MESA chose silence when it came to Dr. Afrasiabi? And what does Ali Banuazizi, former president of MESA have to say in his defense after being criticized by Dr. Afrasiabi for hypocritically axing his complaint against Harvard professor Mottahedeh? It is absolutely shameful by any stretch of imagination.
Good job , Kaveh . Never
by mojgan1 (not verified) on Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:21 PM PSTGood job , Kaveh . Never mind the Zio-morons and Israeli cyber-soldiers on this site . They have to post something to get their shekel worth it :))
Zion(ist), you forgot to praise other bigots.
by Shadooneh (not verified) on Fri Nov 21, 2008 09:42 PM PSTSince you are so eager to show your school-boy crush on your fellow bigot Glenn Beck, why don't you go on and reveal your zeal for bigotry by extending your admiration for David Duke too? NIAC and CASMII have never apologized for the "regime in Iran". All they are doing is to campaign against the ineffective sanctions and the murderous war a few Zionistas and war mongers like you are trying to bring to the Iranian people. What NIAC and CASMII are doing is to prevent the bloodshed and devastating war that you're longing for.
Kaveh- view these haters as proof at how good you are
by I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek on Fri Nov 21, 2008 01:57 PM PSTYour contribution is that strong and mighty that you attract non-Iranian Zionists to attack you and praise "those too mormons". god bless ya. Hal kardam just by virtue of this. Now, as for the serious bits, you give them hell. You're a genius. All they have are labels and other nonsense. We're all Islamists and hippies and apologists. Thank you.
Double kudos
by Fred on Fri Nov 21, 2008 01:34 PM PSTOk, lets look at it this way. A self proclaimed Islamist who prides himself on his resume as being an adviser of the Islamist republic with extensive contacts and colleagues in the Islamist regime.
He openly collaborates with a former number two of the Islamist republic foreign ministry in propaganda activity on behalf of the Islamist republic and is one of the public faces of the pro Islamist republic in the mass media.
This chap has had disagreement with a university, has gone through the legal process and has taken it all the way up to the Supreme Court and lost. The presumption being he believed in the system otherwise should he had prevailed legally it would have been incumbent upon him to write the same sort of I’ve been wronged write-ups, an unlikely event.
This same person defends a regime that summarily kicks out students for their beliefs or does not let them register to begin with and at times tortureing and imprisoning them. His ideological client/regime fires instructors, teachers and even tenured university professors with no, nada, no way Jose legal recourse. Give that one who detected an Islamist hypocrisy a double kudos.
Don't mind these IDIOTS Mr. Afrasiabi
by faraneh2 on Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:16 AM PSTThis is for the idiots who don't even pause to ask if Afrasiabi has a valid point about being victimized by Harvard and its cronies. Some of them are probably Harvard cronies themselves reeling in pain now that Afrasiabi has courageously fought for his rights instead of letting them step on him like they do to so many people like Cornel West who lest Harvard in disgust. The fact that Afrasiabi has outshined his Harvard rivals intellectually by publishing at Harvard must be killing his enemies.
You are a hero in my book Mr. Afrasiabi
by Ikatayoon on Fri Nov 21, 2008 09:44 AM PSTDear Mr. Afrasiabi: My heart breaks for you. How incredibly sad that you have been maligned so much and even more sad that our "intellectuals" have failed the test in your case. If they were even near the caliber of your American intellectual supporters I'm sure they would have. So it's really a negative testimony on them more than anything else. You are however a hero in my book and I admire your writing talent and your resilience in your david and goliat fight for justice.
One more time, Kudos to those two Mormons!
by Zion on Fri Nov 21, 2008 09:48 AM PSTMitt Romney and Glenn Beck, and kudos to Harvard too. Good to know that there are still democratic organs functioning in America to reject the apologists for inhuman ideologies.
I also have a suggestion. It seems some people are untouchable in this site. Evidently members of NIAC, CASMII and other individual politically active apologists of the regime in Iran are among them. You could prepare a full list, so those who comment know not to waste their time on them. Thanks.
Outrageous what Harvard has done to Afrasiabi
by foadazimi on Fri Nov 21, 2008 08:47 AM PSTShame on Harvard for mistreating an Iranian scholar like this. Googling this, I found this other article by Afrasiabi that is called A Letter To America and gives detail of the unspeakable violation of his human rights: //www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GB17Ak02....
Those intellectual imbeciles who criticize Afrasiabi are probably the same ones who never get tried of criticizing the slightest human rights violation in Iran by the mullahs, as they should, but when it comes to a case like this they become hypocritical double standards. What does this really say about them or the socalled academics who have been silent on the oppression of Afrasiabi at Harvard? I hope they have a good answer other than cozying to power!!!
You reap what you sow. If It
by Overjoyed (not verified) on Fri Nov 21, 2008 08:36 AM PSTYou reap what you sow. If It were up to me, I would have deported you.
Btw, Al-Qeada is reading Chomsky too. You should be proud.
Kaveh this was very sad. I'm sorry this happened.
by I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek on Fri Nov 21, 2008 07:34 AM PSTThanks for your contributions. Thanks for sticking up. Keep at it if you have the heart to. This is a double standard and Harvard ought to be ashamed. Thanks.
great stuff
by Tim Bowen (not verified) on Fri Nov 21, 2008 07:09 AM PSTwow, what a story, absolutely first rate, can't wait to read the rest. All the biased readers pay attention to the human rights violation in US and at its cherished institutions.
To laugh or cry
by Realist (not verified) on Fri Nov 21, 2008 05:20 AM PSTHaving read Kaveh's article and then the writings committed by Cyclicforward, Zion, and Fred, one doesn't know to laugh or cry at the degenerate mentality of the three commentators.
Should the society you are aiming to achieve in Iran, be built on the same principles as the behaviour of the Harvard University? Then why bother? Universities in Iran already behave the same way.
Should people you don't like be blacklisted? Why bother, it is already practiced in Iran
Approving a television program mimicking free speech and censoring the participants is alright? Why bother? That is the norm in Iran.
All in all, I think mentality of this gang of three is actually in better accord with that of the IRI than Mr. Afrasiabi's.
Kaveh
by cyclicforward on Thu Nov 20, 2008 09:40 PM PSTIn my opinion Harvard is correct in banning you from the campus. You are a work of art.