The prospect of messianic fanatic mullahs acquiring nuclear weapons presents an existential danger to entire swaths of the world and puts millions of lives at risk. Clearly the Obama administration understands this and has chosen to act at this juncture in the most effective manner short of a military or surgical air strike, with all its potential ramifications to the stability of the Middle East, not to speak of the world itself.
The policy that will have maximum impact on the Iranian regime is to cut off the billions of oil revenues, their instrument of power and moral corruption, enabling the brutal dominance over an otherwise cowered populace that would otherwise celebrate the departure of the mullahs and their ilk from their seats of draconian power.
The greatest impact can be realized by crippling Iran's oil revenues through a worldwide and effective embargo on its oil exports, Iran's main source of income, reaping more than $73 billion in 2010 alone and covering more than 50% of its national budget. Combining such an embargo along with extensive sanctions -- both those already in place, and those about to be instituted such as blacklisting Iran's National Bank and all banks or institutions who transact with it -- would render a crippling blow to the ability of the Iranian regime to keep their largely restive populace under their tyrannical control.
In its most wide ranging effort to date the Obama administration is sending State Department officials and interlocutors to visit and meet with officials from various countries including Saudi Arabia in order to assure the availability of additional oil supplies to cover any shortfall in world markets from an effective Iranian embargo. This in spite of, or because of, reports coming out of OPEC's meeting earlier this month that Iran's oil minister Rostam Ghasaemi reported that Saudi Arabia and Iran had "reached a deal that the Saudis wouldn't raise their oil production to make up for Iran's market share in case U.S. and Europe sanction Iran's oil." The Administrations objectives were clearly highlighted by the State Department's spokesoperson Victoria Nuland's comments earlier this week, "encouraging all our partners to do what they can to wean themselves from Iranian Oil", such as discussions with Japanese officialdom urging Japan to reduce it reliance on Iranian oil, now covering some 10% of their oil import needs.
Most significantly is the prospective cooperation of France and Britain toward cutting off all Iranian oil imports together with the 27 European Union Countries. Such an embargo covering some 450,000 barrels/day, or near 25 percent of Iran's daily loadings, would have enormous financial and symbolic impact on the Iranian regime.
Yet there is one oily fly in this ointment. And that is the perceived and misguided wisdom that any interruption in the flow of Iranian oil would cause enormous damage to the world's economy. It is a singular canard propagated in large measure by Iran itself.
It is a misnomer effectively exploited by crude oil traders and too oft manipulators, together with a compliant press, making this perception an important driver of oil prices, while giving the Iranians ever higher returns for their oil exports and delivering enormous profits to the oil speculators. Yesterday alone when it became generally known that a meeting was being held in Rome between the U.S., EU nations and their Asia-Pacific allies, vowing to bring increased pressure on Iran to abandon its nuclear program, the speculators had a field day. The price of oil quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange surged by 3.4 percent or $3.19 per barrel, and in the one way momentum of these events, another near $1.50 the following day. Other than the oil traders, the oil producers and ironically Iran itself, no one benefits by these pricing distortions, and worse they place the economic recovery at great risk.
Yet to countervene the speculators and to put at ease the 'built in' anxieties elicited whenever there is even the vaguest concern about oil supplies, the U.S. has in its arsenal a mighty weapon. It is the 750 million barrels that the government has in its Strategic Petroleum Reserve. It is an instrument that can calm these excitable markets if used effectively.
All that needs be done is for the government to announce a policy that any unusual price movements due to Iranian oil embargo policies will be met with a release from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Just the broadcast of such a policy will have an enormous becalming effect on the markets. It will take away from the oil traders the surety of a one way bet of ever higher prices. It will deny the Iranians greater income for what they are able to export. Most importantly, it may very well achieve the Administration and much of the world's shared objective of either bringing the Iranian nuclear program to an end or even achieving a change in regime. And this without a major economic disruption or a spike in oil prices.
Can one think of a better strategic function for our Strategic Petroleum Reserve?
First published in HuffingtonPost.com.
AUTHOR
Raymond J. Learsy is the author of a new book, Oil and Finance: The Epic Corruption 2006-2010, and the updated version of Over a Barrel: Breaking Oil’s Grip on Our Future. Currently, he is a member of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Learsy has been featured in the National Review Online, the New York Times, the Pipeline and Gas Journal, the Huffington Post and on CNBC.
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
What happens after the regime change?
by ham1328 on Wed Dec 28, 2011 08:22 AM PSTLets assume this policy works so well that IRI not just stops it's nuclear program, but even is replaced by another government. Can Iran ever recover and gain her market share of oil export? I hope all goes as planned, but somehow, nothing ever goes as planned! I'll keep my fingers crossed.
Embargo now
by RostamZ on Sat Dec 24, 2011 08:41 AM PSTIt is essential that oil embargo takes place. Also it is important to make sure that Mullahs cannot mix their oil into export of Iraq and Russia. I believe this is the final option to keep the war away from Iran.
Why would China & other Asian countries voluntarily
by AMIR1973 on Fri Dec 23, 2011 09:35 PM PSTgo along with a boycott of the IRI's oil? They believe they need that oil for their economies, and the IRI needs the money from selling its oil. The Asian countries have not and will not institute a voluntary "boycott" of the IRI's oil.
لقمهرو از پشت سر تو دهان گذاشتن
BavafaFri Dec 23, 2011 05:19 PM PST
However, it begs the question why not prevent selling the oil by the means of boycott so there won't be any way to circumvent it.
I am not by any means any expert in foreign trades, but one can wonder, what would it be to prevent Iran to sell oil for goods from China.
'Hambastegi' is the main key to victory
Mehrdad
Sanctions on Central Bank may have similar effect to oil embargo
by AMIR1973 on Fri Dec 23, 2011 04:05 PM PSTIf payments for IRI's oil cannot be conducted through any of its banks, particularly its Central Bank, this may have a similar effect to an oil embargo.
“a type of boycott of magnitude to their current sanction"
by Bavafa on Fri Dec 23, 2011 03:28 PM PSTJust as they have been able to muster a kind of sanction (i.e. if you deal with Iran, you lose all business with us) the same type of boycott can and should be applied (i.e. if you buy oil from Iran, you lose all business with us)
'Hambastegi' is the main key to victory
Mehrdad
IRI's biggest customers by far are Asian countries
by AMIR1973 on Fri Dec 23, 2011 03:20 PM PSTCurrently, the US buys no oil from the IRI and the EU imports a relatively small percentage of its total oil needs from the IRI. So how is a so-called "boycott" by the Western countries supposed to stop China, India, Japan, South Korea, etc. from buying oil from the IRI?
“The perceived and misguided wisdom”…
by Bavafa on Fri Dec 23, 2011 08:20 AM PSTThe author, for whatever reason, starts his otherwise legitimate point and suggestion to a difficult situation with a paragraph that is short of logic and full of rhetoric – scare tactic one may even say.
Nevertheless, an oil boycott not an embargo, which is an act of war and what he is suggesting to avoid, is the most peaceful and moral way to bring IRI regime to its demise.
Oil revenue has been the only blood line for this regime to survive, one may reasonably argue that it has been the only motivation thru massive theft for its leaders to keep this regime going. Cutting down the source of only income will have a great and negative impact on its leaders and the direction they are headed.
The West needs to put its principal ahead of its greed and establish a type of boycott of magnitude to their current sanction against IRI oil.
'Hambastegi' is the main key to victory
Mehrdad
Just an FYI
by Fathali Ghahremani on Fri Dec 23, 2011 07:51 AM PSTniether Pakistan, India, Israel or North Korea have oil. Yet they have developed nuclear bombs. Why does this equation "No oil=no bomb" not hold for them?