A failed pre-emptive attack on Iranians

Share/Save/Bookmark

A failed pre-emptive attack on Iranians
by Ari Siletz
10-Feb-2012
 

Circa 550 BC King Croesus of Lydia began to fear the expanding power of the Persians under King Cyrus. Aware of Cyrus’ desire to gain influence at the expense of the Lydian Empire, Croesus determined he should go on the offensive and nip the Persians in the bud before they became a real threat.

Croesus had a lot to lose. His empire was fabulously wealthy, having pioneered the first gold and silver monetary system. Guarding such a huge hoard of treasure could not be left to chance. Being the superstitious kind Croesus decided to consult the oracles before he attacked, but being also of a scientific bent he ran an experiment to see which oracle’s forecasts are accurate. So he sent his messengers to eight oracles and told them to wait one hundred days before asking each oracle what Croesus was doing on that day in Lydia.

Just so that the answers would be meaningful, Croesus made sure that he did something really strange on the 100th day. That way an obvious answer like, “Mightly Croesus is eating his lunch before an afternoon nap,” wouldn’t accidentally turn out to be true. On the hundredth day, Croesus made turtle-lamb soup! The whole list of ingredients is lost to history, but basically he chopped up a turtle and a lamb and boiled them together in a bronze pot. I assume turtle-lamb soup was an uncommon dish in Lydia at the time (and ever since).

Of the eight oracles only the oracle at Delphi got the answer right. His own oracle at Lydia probably said something like, “Croesus will see a turtle fall from the sky on a lamb’s head,” and some other oracle may have said, “Nay, I see a lamb grazing on the back of a giant turtle.”  The Delphi pundits, however, nailed it:  “Croesus will be eating strong-shelled turtle seething in bronze with the flesh of lamb.” So the Delphi think tank got the job of deciding whether or not Croesus should attack Iran.

It turned out that outside the kitchen, the oracle was a quite a bit less specific. Instead of saying something like, “Croesus will run his sword through Cyrus in a turtleneck sweater made of lambskin,” they said that if Croesus made war on Cyrus he shall “destroy a great empire.” So Croesus happily went to war with Cyrus and it turned out the great empire he managed to destroy was his own. Score one for the Delphi think tank! If they had TV back then these geniuses would surely have been invited to all the news shows.

Above: "Pythia," Ceramic by Anne Russel (Pythia was the priestess at Delphi)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by Ari SiletzCommentsDate
چرا مصدق آسوده نمی خوابد.
8
Aug 17, 2012
This blog makes me a plagarist
2
Aug 16, 2012
Double standards outside the boxing ring
6
Aug 12, 2012
more from Ari Siletz
 
Ari Siletz

Thanks folks

by Ari Siletz on

Stating the obvious, the analogy breaks down when we compare the relative strengths of Lydia and the U.S. vis a vis Iran for each period. The fall of the U.S. Empire is likely to come from a self-destruction through unwise foreign policy. An invasion of Iran would be just the first domino. Same thing as far as oracles are concerned: a great empire will fall. The oracle doesn't tell you how!


Bavafa

Excellent read...

by Bavafa on

Many thanks.

'Hambastegi' is the main key to victory 

Mehrdad


default

Ari

by darius on

Very well said , I like your analogy .  Banzai to you