BoosBoos

RostamZ that's not realistic to go from tyranny to democracy

Never been accomplished anywhere ever, we are in a very bad state today.  Very Bad.  Read this, I wrote to unwind misunderstandings and shine light on shadows that have been manufactured among Iranians.

//iranian.com/main/blog/amirparvizforsecu...

Sorry for my misunderstanding

We are on the same page with only one difference. I don't want to see another monarchy. For me the best scenario is secular repulic with democracy at full swing.

Making Secrets of USA Clear. How they really back IRI/Israel.

Vast majority of Iranians want Israel to resolve its issues with Palestinians truthfully,
honorably, honestly, humanely and justly.  They do not back the PLO or
Hezbollah or Hamas.

Iranians Agree far more with the relationship of friendship with Israel
then the IRI duplicity against Israel.  Palestine/Iran is not comparable
to US/Israel relationship. 

Our Iranian/Persian Ancestors helped protect Israel and pay to build
Jerusalem for them because it was their peoples request and the site of
an ancient temple for them.  After the Persian King liberated Bagdad
from the despot in power, the army discovered that the Jews had
experienced a holocaust/near genocide and was bound to help them restore
their freedom.

Previous to this holocaust they lived in Canaan (which is not too far
from Bagdad), this was their original homeland as explained in the torah
in modern day Iraq next to the Euphrates River. 

Due to the Bagdad Holocaust and knowledge of their leaders regarding
Jerusalem plus some great decision making on their part (as far as
trade/safety/water for farming etc) they asked the Persian King to Not
be relocated in their promised land of Canaan, but in an area that had
1500 years earlier belonged to the phonecians/who are modern day
palestinians.

The Modern intellectual dishonesty on the Israeli part stems from the
fact that they say Canaan is their promised land and located in modern
day israel.  Not true.  Their real homeland, original one known as the
promised land or Canaan, is stuck in the most unforgiving location in
Iraq today, with no ports.

If I were jewish today, I would prefer Israels current location and
can't blame them for the misinformation.  We need truthfulness first and
foremost and still the choice is theirs to make not ours, whether they
want their promised land (Canaan) vs. Given Land and they should not lie
so much to their own people about the difference.

With Israelis choice in mind, next they need to be honest with the local
population and give them a life too... either 1 state or 2 based on
consensus, I think palestinians should also have their choice too.  So
if they seem Nationalistic wanting to keep the name palestine mostly,
then I think both agree on  a 1 state for each=2 states not a combined
state.

The stalling on a solution is helpful to no one except the USA.  The
USA's aim is divide and conquer and Israel helps them perpetuate the
real undeclared US policy... by artificially manufacturing a clash of
civilizations. So Israeli injustices of denying palestians any country,
are used to create Khomeini's and radical islamists.  That is why the
USA will veto the idea of a palestinian state.  It wants fundamentalism
for the region.

The USA ultimately wishes to use this issue to dominate the region and
own all the various peoples resources, because as mullahs and democratic
wisdom teaches us... why walk when their are so many donkeys that can
be ridden.

Love and Light.

Amir Parviz

So "No Fear" is back as "BoosBoos". :-)

So transparent it's not even funny...

Amir ... I agree

Amir ... I agree

maziar 58 good point, who is usa anyways?

Sadly the middle east and iran are afloat on energy and the USA says it belongs to them.

They have a saying, get your filthy iranian hands off my Oil and Gas, this is known as the Carter doctrine and has been followed since 1979. 

..

who is USA to considering even......about another nation ?

Iranian inside or outside are just not FIGHTING  (meant  only verbaly) for a common cause which ought to be removing the mollahs for good and there is not any bloody civil war like titu's land.

USA and her allies may succeed (or already have done ) in division among peoples BUT not the nation.

Maziar

+ 1 Amir +1 Soosan

I have a sense of humor Amir ... good one.  

And Soosan-aziz-e Khoshkel:

You're right: The US already has forced Iran to foot the bill for 2 million refugees (which as an Iranian I say I am proud that we didn't send people back to be slaughtered by the Taliban); and the U.S. has sparked a civil war in Afghanistan and Iraq; the drugs trade from Afghanistan is also the US's fault because police powers are now in their hands and people in a war torn country are growing drugs and trying to smuggle them into and through Iran.

Any one that pretends that the US has the situation under control is kidding themselves.  

Boos boos JJ and I are terrifying in battle gear

In all seriousness, no human is born to kill.  Volunteer will need 6 months training.

There are plenty of people within iran and the key is "iranians from within iran" that want to fight for the liberation of iran from IRI.

I know this can be arranged, but the USA does not want it, they privately tell their friends they love the IRI. Just not the Khameneii crew in control of power.

The USA will not be allowed to go beyond its role, the responsibility for freeing iran is with Iranian soldiers of the past, not JJ and Me.  They need to plan and organize and execute it, exactly like in 1953.

All they need is assistance and protection.

and

It seems that through this U.S is going to dump its Taliban problem on us ..!!!!

basically

So basically If you are Persian while your are losing south ( hint oil ) and many other places in your efforts to establish Persia you are going to just end up with Afghanistan .... LOL 

Boots on the ground

" by amirparvizforsecularmonarchy on Sat Aug 27, 2011 08:18 PM PDTWhat we are talking about, is not a military attack that is the wrong phrase, we are talking about "assistance and protection".  "

Lest I be suspected as an "IRI Spy," I just cannot imagine you and JJ with assault rifles in your hands storming into Ferdowsi Square.  Maybe I'm under-rating your commando skills, but to me the logical outcome is that IF something like that were to happen, for you to prevail, the U.S. military would have to put boots on the ground; and they don't and won't take orders from you.  The U.S. military serves the foreign policy objectives of the U.S. government and you already told us what those objectives are.  Am I wrong?   

Boos Boos,

Iranians are overwhelmingly against boots on the ground, and military attack on civilians.

What we are talking about, is not a military attack that is the wrong phrase, we are talking about "assistance and protection".

Assistance= give iranian comanders and their all volunteer non Mek liberators 8 divisions, salaries, weapons tanks etc.

Protection= if IRI attacks us liberating our own country that does not belong to them say by war plane or helicopter, then knock that threat out.  If the basiji's come after us from base ABC, destroy their entire convoy and flatten the base.

No one wants a military attack by outside forces, but we all sure would love some protection from IRI in order to protect people if they use basiji against liberating forces.  No one cares about the basiji and iri forces that stand up to the people and do not disband upon the arrival of iranians.

We care about the people.  Thats why we don't want usa forces used indiscriminately on Iran.  The protectionshould be selective and based on intelligence.

People that make up false quotes to push for War.

• "by Simorgh5555 on Sat Aug 27, 2011 08:09 PM PDT  If I have insulted your Islamic Republic and your Spiritual Leader then I wiill not apologise. "

You can actually quote me on this, really?  Let's see it.  I can quote you showing that you are a war monger against Iran:  

• “ by Simorgh5555 on Fri Aug 26, 2011 01:33 PM PDT  Anyother reason to hesitate against waging war on the IR? For the sake of LakeUrumieh, for the thousands of trees cutdown in Kurdistan, for the Caspian, forthe Alborz mountains please support military action.  MilitaryAction can save Lake Urumieh.”

//iranian.com/main/blog/boosboos/iranian-mccarthyism-spies-house-love 

amirparvizforsecularmonarchy

" by amirparvizforsecularmonarchy on Sat Aug 27, 2011 08:06 PM PDT Abbasi and Razazadeh are codemned by me "   Not a single part of this article is about "Abbasi,"  Benito Mussolini, "Razazadeh" or Michelangelo.     You should have a look at this:   //iranian.com/main/blog/boosboos/iranian-mccarthyism-spies-house-love   

Boos Boos Jan

 Why should I engage you in a debate outside Iranian.com if you cannot beat me here. This is the ringside. Say what you have to say here. Not a videotape. 

It is simple. 

You are being incredibly immature despite the fact that I have asked you to qualify your bizarre conspiracy theories with further evidence. If you are not going to answer my questions and publicly condemn the Islamic Republic who disparaged the Persian civilisation by saying Cyrus was a Jew and he never existed shows that you are clutching at straws and just like the worst of losers in a debateyou resort to screaming and insults. 

If I have insulted your Islamic Republic and your Spiritual Leader then I wiill not apologise.  

Unless you had a previous Avatar, I guess you are new here. I'll cut you a break and leave your bruised and battered body (metaphorically speaking) bleeding on the sidewalk for a friend or relative to collect.  

I'll see you tomorrow  for round 2 (that is if you are still alive and want another bloody nose) . Until then goodnight. 

Simorgh you have a point.

The IRI is the worst enemy Iran has, its the enemy within, even worse than the lady quoting to divide iran.

Nasrallah needs a death sentence.

The thing is don't belittle US Interests, the reason it is not spoken in public is because like all other civilizations it is a goal of theirs on some level.

Abbasi and Razazadeh are codemned by me, but not sure what to do about the millions of traitors like these the IRI has produced.  They have the rght to express themselves, but we need independent schools and insttutions to condemn such nonsense.

I think its fair to publically shame these people for being unpatriotic vatanforoosh, for a while, but the solution is education and programs to remove brainwashing.  these guys are muslims first and want to destroy iran, this ws the who goal of clash of civilizations and it proves my point that it is being pursued today, so I must be careful to ot mislead people of the wests aims.

Who is "us"? What about prior condemnations by Iranians?

• " by amirparvizforsecularmonarchy on Sat Aug 27, 2011 07:54 PM PDT We are prepared for western or global support like air power & $ as long as it is authorized by us ...."

We Agree.

We are prepared for western or global support like air power & $ as long as it is authorized by us so it can not be used to further their aims of divide and conquer.

We need to take out skies from IRI's use, helicopter gun ships and ground strike aircraft, and demolish basiji barracks/bases not near people.  And then only provide strikes as ordered by special forces on the ground imbedded with iranian liberation force.

Still can't quote me to support your claims?

Hmmmm ... you can "smell supporters of the Islamic republic" (whatever that means) but you cannot QUOTE a person to make that claim; You claim you have practice in doing that; Let's see how your "smell" test holds up before a neutral arbiter of fact in real life.  

Put your name, address, and phone number right here and you can try with me at a videotaped-deposition and we will put up for all the Iranian.com members to see.  Test out your theory bigshot.  But you still can't quote me, right?  You can only make excuses for war against Iran?  Got it.

•  " by Simorgh5555 on Sat Aug 27, 2011 07:34 PM PDT Believe me I have taken supporters of the Islamic Republic and spewed them out of my mouth.  Its that easy. I can smell them off a mile away. " 

• “ by Simorgh5555 on Fri Aug 26, 2011 01:33 PM PDT  Anyother reason to hesitate against waging war on the IR? For the sake of LakeUrumieh, for the thousands of trees cutdown in Kurdistan, for the Caspian, forthe Alborz mountains please support military action.  MilitaryAction can save Lake Urumieh.”

Amir Parvis 2

 Since Boos Boos won't answer the question I wonder if you can. What is worse some has been Congresswoman who made a statement and then later apologised for a stupid statement in Congress or that 1) There is no Persian Civilisation 2) Cyrus was a Jew 3) Cyrus was an invention of Jews and scientists. 

Which is more damaging and anti-Iranian. Boos Boos by his silence refuses to condemn the Islamic Republic and therefore we know exactly where he stands. What is your honest opinion? 

You fail to condemn Hassan Nasrollah for saying there is no such thing as a Persian Civilisation because there is a voice over

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=m30FcZU-9nY

but say nothing about Hassan Abbasi who made similar comments disparaging Iranian history as being Jews

//www.flixya.com/video/1695445/Jewish-influence-on-Achaemenid-Empire

Or how about your friend 'Doctor' Ravazadeh who said Cyrus does not exist?

//iranian.com/main/2011/jun/cyrus-invented-zionists

Amir Parviz Jan

Military action can take effect in different forms. I have said before I oppose a ground force invasion of Iran by any foreign force . I have maintained this position since day one when I registered on this forum. However, I am in support of targeted assassinations and surgical airstrikes of the Majlis, Basij and Revolutionary Guard barracks. 

Iran must ultimately be liberated by Iranians whether this is done by an Iranian liberation army which I support or by a mass movement. Any ground force operation by Iranians must be supported by an airforce. You don't need a military stategist to tell you this. Without an airforce the troops on the ground will perish or you are heading for a nasty guerilla type warfare which I don't wish. 

If you can show me an Iranian philanthropist who is willing to pay for a fleet of warplanes then I wil be happy to tell the West to get lost. Until then we have no choice. The Mullahs have shown that they cannot be reasoned with. They kill 8 Iranians per hour and distribute condoms to prison wardens to rape men and women prisoners.

 //www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/24/jailed-iran-opposition-activists-rape

These are the sick evil people you are dealing with. Destroy them and make it quick.  

I think the West lost its greatest opportunity to get rid of the Islamic Republic in the protests of 2009.  

I repeat military action is the only solution. Quote me again, Boos Boos.  

who is Abbasi and Razazadeh again?

Simorg

In the early 80's when reagan was in power

An iranian general organized several thousand iranians against the regime into a division, reagan stopped them because he wanted to keep the IRI.

Iranians would have no problem organizing 200k to 400k group and train them if they had a green light from usa and help.

The fact is the usa has other plans, us politicians listen to wall street, oil companies and the military complex, not iranians.

Hit them with what?  We use the wests direct involvement to our peril.

Boos Boos Ok Here is a quote

"NO ONE takes this jerk seriously."  

• False:  A Congresswoman and AIPAC did - the speech calling for Iran to be divided into pieces received tremendous applause by the Israeli lobby. 

Believe me I have taken supporters of the Islamic Republic and spewed them out of my mouth.  Its that easy. I can smell them off a mile away. 

my point is that they are using islam to divide and rule us now

so obviously I am against islam in govt, but people free to worship whatever they want like usa and unlike china.

So we need to be smart as to them not using us to further their aims of divide and conquer.

You are so certian that they won't divide iran if they enter it with troops on the ground or set up another islamic system, so to get Most Iranans support on their side, the USA needs to give up on islam in govt and its support of fundamentalists and support reza pahlavi's strategy, no boots on the ground, cut off all regimes money, support a referendum movement and let iranians knock out the regime.

You see how easy it was? I did quote you. Now you quote me.

“ by Simorgh5555 on Sat Aug 27, 2011 07:24 PM PDT MilitaryAction is the only solution. Boos Boos feel free to quote me.”  

Amir Parviz

Oh yes, I am all for sanctions and an embargo. But sanctions and embargo alone means a sluggish and slow death for the IR which will hurt our compatriots. Strike them and strike them hard. 

I will openly rejoice to see the death of Ahmadinejad and Khamenei. Their death, and those criminals who support them and have the blood of Iranians on their hand will be a massive cause for celebration for me. They have negated themselves of nationhood. 

Everyone from the judge who sentenced young Iranians to hang, from the hangman who puts the nose around the neck of the 8 Iranians who dies every hour, and the prison warden who rapes and murders young Iranian men and women quite frankly can be blown up to smithereens.  

Military Action is the only solution. Boos Boos feel free to quote me.  

I don't respond to diversionary Imaginary Quotes ... Got it?

People that don't QUOTE ME don't get a response to imaginary quotes: 

See this article:

//iranian.com/main/blog/boosboos/iranian-mccarthyism-spies-house-love 

For example you can quote me that it's my opinion that those who are war mongers against Iran are traitors to the iranian people, like below:

• “ by Simorgh5555 on Fri Aug 26, 2011 01:33 PM PDT  Anyother reason to hesitate against waging war on the IR? For the sake of LakeUrumieh, for the thousands of trees cutdown in Kurdistan, for the Caspian, forthe Alborz mountains please support military action.  MilitaryAction can save Lake Urumieh.” 

Boos Boos

Zionist this. AIPAC that. Personal insults do not explain or justify your skewed interpretation of history, foreign policy and middle east policy. 

As soon as you lose the argument it gets personal to you.

Are you going to answer my questions or not?

1) Are you goint to condemn Abbasi and Ravazadeh or not?

2) Please point out where another congressman out 435 have endorsed Harman's view points?

3) Given the huge Pan Turkist threat buoyed on by Israel name me one violent incident or atrocity committed  in their name. Given the huge number of ethnic Azaris this shouldn't be hard to do.