Is International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran turning Neo-con?

Share/Save/Bookmark

greenforever
by greenforever
16-Jul-2010
 

When I first this piece about Green infighting, it really saddened and upset me. I am Green – because I believe that the struggle in Iran can be best won if it is seen as a civil rights struggle. And no thinkers have put that in words better than Professor Hamid Dabashi and Hadi Ghaemi of the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran.

That’s why I was so upset to see that Rudi Bakhtiar – who works for Ghaemi – had attacked author Hooman Majd, also a Green.

But everyone makes a mistake. And we all lose our temper every once in a while. So I hope Bakhtiar apologizes to Majd and puts this behind them.

But that one mistake has now been turned into two mistakes.

On July 7 in London, Bakhtiar spoke at the uber-neocon think tank The Henry Jackson Society. Named after Senator Henry Jackson, who is considered the father of neo-conservativism, the society represents everything that is wrong with neo-con foreign policy. (Neo-con war criminals like Perle and Wolfowitz met when they worked for Henry Jackson!)

Most of the Greens in London loathe the The Henry Jackson Society because they remember how the “think tank” helped push Britain into the Iraq war, and because it has championed bombing Iran for years.

So I was pretty shocked when a friend told me that Bakhtiar and the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran was speaking at the Society.

Just to give you an idea, war-monger Bill Kristol spoke at the Society a few weeks before Bakhtiar. A week after her, there was a presentation for the Friends of Israel Initiative. Earlier, Iranian charlatans like Amir Abbas Fakhravar spoke at the Society.

I am not saying that these people should be silenced. But I just cannot see why any real Green would want to be associated with them. It’s not that it is such a disaster that they spoke at the same place – it’s that the place has the agenda of promoting war and imperialism in the Middle East. So speaking there isn’t an innocent act – it’s a statement.

I am the first to defend the Greens. But sometimes we also have to be self-critical. We need to do some soul searching. Clearly we have fallen a bit short. But we shouldn’t get desperate. And we shouldn't lower our standards.

Splendid organizations like the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran need to be led and represented by people who have the judgment to lead.

Everyone can commit a mistake. But this is becoming a pattern.


Share/Save/Bookmark

 
Ali Lakani

Where's the green?

by Ali Lakani on

You are focusing solely on the venue at which Bakhtiar spoke and not content of her speech. I don't see any indication of the Int.'l Campaign's going "neocon" as your sensational title and posting unfairly charges. If they are saying the same thing to various audiences of all persuasion then you cannot make such allegation unless you need to show their policies are such. Unless you have ulterior motives for making such unsubstantiated and sensational allegations.

This is another instance of someone registering on Iranian.com and within seconds posting a blog accusing respected Iranian organizations and public figures of unfounded charges and allegations.  It was done to Dr. Abbas Milani, to PAAIA, and now to Rudi Bakhtiar and the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran.  This divisive action is anything but green or in favor of human rights. If you were a true "green forever", you would appreciate all that the Int.'l Campaign has done for those abused and tortured, on the death row and persecuted in Iran. This literature sounds like that of Kayhan's Shariatmadari's, not a "green forever". You should know some of us can tell the difference.


bushtheliberator

"Turning Neo-con ??", Let's hope so !

by bushtheliberator on

dear Greenforever,

                  Any human rights advance in Iran will likely require a long,nasty fight ! Don't dismiss the friendly Green "Neo-con" cohort; we mean well,and we're handy with a gun.

I offer no apology for removeing Saddam, only for failing to do it in 1991