Time to nuke Iran

Share/Save/Bookmark

larryklayman
by larryklayman
05-Jan-2012
 

Let’s be blunt. The Islamic Republic of Iran is and has always been the major problem and danger in the Middle East and internationally. President Barack Hussein Obama and his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, have pursued, at best, a policy of appeasement that has not worked – even assuming their intentions are genuine, which I doubt. Iran will within months acquire atomic weapons that can be delivered through missiles, as well as planes and ships, and has threatened – in the face of increased sanctions – not only to annihilate Israel and attack us too, but also to set ablaze the Strait of Hormuz, which is the gateway to oil shipments from Middle Eastern producers throughout the world. This would cripple the world’s economy and send us into an irreparable depression. Iran’s threat is a declaration of war, and we must now respond in kind with massive force!

The immediate need to destroy the Islamic regime once and for all is heightened by what is going on in neighboring Iraq. Predictably, after nine years of American intervention and occupation cleverly couched by former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney – after Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction were not found – as the creation of a “free democracy” in this Arab country, with all of the blood, sweat and tears our brave servicemen and their families have borne, Iraq is now becoming “greater Iran.” Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, even by the admission of the liberal New York Times, “is moving to consolidate authority, create a one-party Shiite dominated state” and in effect throw his lot in with his Shiite brothers in Tehran – the neo-Nazi mullahs who not only threaten and are thus far succeeding with world conquest in the name of Allah, but also torture, maim and murder their own people to hold on to total power. So now Iran and Iraq will essentially be one big terrorist state – with tremendous wealth, thanks to their huge oil resources and revenues – bent on successfully waging Islamic revolution not just in the Middle East, but worldwide. And, of course we know that the Islamic regime supports other terrorist states and groups and is the major financier and source of terrorism.

I, for one, am aghast not just at the prospect of a “greater Iran,” but I am outraged that our so-called political leaders sacrificed a huge number of American lives for what was inevitable in the end. But despite the stupidity and negligence of George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama and their enablers, like Sen. John McCain, in not making the removal of the Islamic regime in Iran the major priority, now is the final time to act before it is too late. The radical mullahs in Tehran are a scourge that must be destroyed. To allow them to exist one minute more would be tantamount to reliving the mistakes that led to the rise of Adolf Hitler, World War II and the Holocaust.

Importantly, an increasing number of Iranian-Americans now understand that war with Iran will entail significant civilian casualties in their native country. And, while many Iranian-Americans still have loved ones there, they are increasingly willing to accept the consequences of all-out war with the Islamic regime. That is because they know, better than most of the rest of us, what this terrorist state means not only to the fight for freedom in their own country, but to world peace and hoped for economic prosperity. This is the most evil regime since the Third Reich, and it must be expunged now before it is too late.

Ironically, if there ever were a time to use nuclear weapons, like radiation-reduced neutron bombs, to excise a cancer such as this, now is the moment. While our armed forces are now clear of the quagmire in Iraq, to sacrifice many more American lives would be criminal. And, a quick strike is necessary – much like the Israeli pre-emptive air strikes that quickly put an end to what otherwise would have been a devastating war with neighboring Arab states in 1967 – to prevent a counterattack that would let the Islamic regime “get off the mat” and wreak devastation on the world economy by closing the Strait of Hormuz and attacking and seriously if not fatally harming Israel, and even other Western interests.

To kill this regime, strong and decisive measures are necessary. The threat is not one just toward Israel anymore, but the entire civilized world, and in particular the well-being of the United States.

It is indeed sad that it has come to this. If Presidents Clinton, Bush and now Obama had had any foresight, a nuclear attack on Iran could have long since been averted. Much like taking out a small lump in a cancerous female breast, the operation could have been simple and done with. Now a total radical double mastectomy is required. Because of this inaction, this Islamic state – so strategically powerful – is the equivalent of Germany prior to World War II. And, it intends not just to eradicate Jews, but Christians as well in furtherance of its Muslim war on all of us.

We are just days from the Iowa caucuses, and some of you may look to a new Republican president in 2012 to solve this and other major problems. Even were a great leader to emerge, which, given the spate of Republican “pygmie candidates,” as I call them, is not going to happen, we cannot wait until early 2013 to crush the mullahs in Iran. And frankly, no Republican candidate has advocated a massive strike to end the Islamic regime. The Republicans just talk a good game. Where have they been for the last three years, as the cancer grew to a tremendous size under the “mullah in chief,” Barack Hussein Obama?! Their efforts amounted to little more than political gamesmanship and are sickening!

Unless he is forced, the prospects of President Obama ordering this forceful action are not great. We thus need to put heat on our political and governmental interests by rising up and demanding this.

Obama and Hillary Clinton are traitors, and they are probably bribed to the hilt by Iran, but that does not relieve the rest of us from demanding action! We cannot allow for the rise of another Hitler-type regime at this time in world history. There are enough problems that confront us, and we must NOW take drastic measures to remove these vile and evil Islamic terrorists from the face of the earth, if for no other reason than to allow us to deal with other matters and get on with business.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by larryklaymanCommentsDate
How Reagan would handle Iran
5
Feb 26, 2012
Did THEY kill him?
50
Feb 02, 2011
more from larryklayman
 
Ali A Parsa

Obama and Hillary as paid agents of IRI?!!!!

by Ali A Parsa on

"Obama and Hillary Clinton are traitors, and they are probably bribed to
the hilt by Iran, but that does not relieve the rest of us from
demanding action! We cannot allow for the rise of another Hitler-type
regime at this time in world history."-Klayman

What is more obvious than as long as U.S. and IRI are

acting in concert status quo is maintained that mainly

benefits the war mongers and war profiteers since the

beginning of the so called "War on Terror."

So many intelligent comments on an all nonsense blog

put the last nails on the coffin of a dead blogger who 

manages to abuse the right of free speech. Is IC awake to see its rules broken?


masoudA

Dear AO

by masoudA on

Does this guy have a website or a forum?  In that case he may be here just fishing - trying to get some of us to go for more hits on his website.   One way or another, I still can't get over the stupidity....

I also found your activities with DNC quiet interesting....do you care to elaborate on a separate blog?  Us Iranians can learn a lot from Americans in such activities.   If you don't - I would also understand.   


Bahram G

Relax everyone

by Bahram G on

Crackpots like this fellow are not only mentally messed up, they also yearn for attention--any attention. So the more people get their hinds in storm, the more creatures like him enjoy themselves. No point in supplying him what he wants and even cussing him out with profanity.

JAVAABE ABLAHAAN KHAAMOOSHIST. This person deserves a response that involves mental rehabilitation by expert professionals. And that is not easily done and certainly not by the kind of responses he got here. He thrives on these reactions. A perverse sense of gratification. Ignore him. That would torments him much more effectively than anything you can tell him or any name you call him.


MM

no need for a degree to be an idiot

by MM on

.


Anonymous Observer

Larry Baby

by Anonymous Observer on

notwithstanding your genocidal drivel here, I do want to mention that as a volunteer Democratic activist during my college years, I devoted a lot of time to researching your other drivel and preparing responses to them, a small part of which actually made its way to the "official" releases. I'm just telling you this FYI-and also to revel in the knowledge that I was at some point--at least to a very small extent--successful in revealing your diabolical nature.  

As we say in Persian: noosh-e jaan!


abtin

Here we go again

by abtin on

Blood boils at reading drivel from chest thumpers like Larry. To call him a psychopath is insult to psychopaths. He is advocating killing millions of innocent people. In my book, this is clearly hate speech.


masoudA

Nuke Iran!?

by masoudA on

This whole post by Larry Klayman is dubious at best.......The whole thing smells......Nobody can be that stupid to come on an Iranian site and suggest to Nuke Iran....let alone anywhere.   I think this guy has an agenda.....an agenda to link every action against the Islamic Republic equal to Nuking Iran.   As Maryam Hojat and many others said, people of Iran are FOR and pray for any action, even strategic military strikes against IR, as long as the Iranian population is not hurt. 


Simorgh5555

VPK

by Simorgh5555 on

I was not siding with him at all. To.be honest with you I haven'teven heard of the guy. if you rad carefully what I said I oppose the obsession with Iran's nuclear ambition. I condemn any military action based on this pretext. What more can I say? I also am.fully in favour of a "Greater Iran" and this is not anyone's business least of all Israel's. However, is Keyman wrong to call the IR a cancer and that it must be removed by force? Of.course not. I don't care whether Keyman is a rabid Zionist or whether he is a nut job who calls Clinton and Obama a traitor. Anyone who says the IR is a cancer and should be removed with force sounds sweet to me regardless of whether he is a Zionist, anti-Zionnis, anti-semite or paedophile.


Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

Simorgh

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on

 

It is more than his title that is stupid. The guy is a nut all the way. From claiming Obama and Clinton are in the pay of IRI to suing Facebook. The same Facebook owned by Mark Zukerberg! 

By siding with him you are only discrediting yourself. I have been an advocate of peace between people of Iran and Israel. But people like this guy make job of reconciliation between people harder.

If there was anyone really in the pay of IRI this guy would be one. He sure makes their case better than anyone. Not even the hard right wing in America is siding with this guy.


Simorgh5555

Larry Keyman

by Simorgh5555 on

The title of Keyman's articile is crass and stupid but he is right on the money when he calls the Islamic Republic a cancer and a threat. A threat not just to neighbouring countries but to Iranians themselves and that is something which concerns me first and foremost. However, any military action with the objective of destroying the nuclear will be a catastrophic human disaster rivalling the stupidity of the Iraq invasion of 2003. The regime is the problem, as Keyman says correctly, and even without the nukes it has and will continue to terrorise its own people and neighbouring countries. The need for military action is a must, but let it be proportionate and targeted to harm the very terrorists occupying Iran. Of course, no military action is without the risk of untineded harm and even civilian casualties but doing nothing to help Iran become liberated is reckless as taking knee-jerk military action. 

The government in power in Iraq has effectively become a puppet of the Islamic Republic and Keyman is right about that. The democracy and freedom promised by George Bush has not only failed to transpire but the country has been plunged back into further darkness by the IR's nefarious influence. 

However, there is nothing wrong with Iraq becoming part of Iran in theory if the correct type of regime were to be in place in Tehran. 

I quite like "Greater Iran" in the same way Mr Keyman probably likes "Greater Israel" to include the West Bank and Gaza, which will be territory designated for the creation of a future Palestinian country. So Mr Keyman can go ####himself in that respect. 

 


مآمور

حجتیه مهدویه

مآمور


we are awiating

I wear an Omega watch


Harpi-Eagle

Oh, and one more thing ...

by Harpi-Eagle on

JJ and IC Admin, shame on you for even posting this Zionist Mother Effer's ranting on Iranian.com

Klayman is a diabolical mouthpiece of AIPAC.

Payandeh Iran, our Ahuraie Fatherland


Harpi-Eagle

Hey Clayman ...

by Harpi-Eagle on

F.U.  How about we nuke yo mama, you jew bag A-Hole.  Your're talking about my fatherland you f***, with or without the traitor mullahs, by the way sh**head, IRI is a creation of your treasonous president Jimmy (The Mole) Carter.  F*** him and all jewbag warmongers condoning a nuclear attack on my country. 

Payandeh Iran, our Ahuraie Fatherland


Rea

Why do people pay attention

by Rea on

.... to every Tom, Dick n Harry ?

It's demeaning.


Faramarz

What a Moron!

by Faramarz on

I am not sure why Iranian.com posts this kind of garbage!

Just because someone has the first amendment rights that doesn't mean that they can shout "fire" in a crowded movie theatre.

Here are a couple of gems from his blog!

About Iraq - "..after nine years of American intervention and occupation cleverly couched by former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.."

Anybody who uses Bush and the adjective cleverly in the same sentence and the same breath needs to have his head examined!

"...Obama and Hillary Clinton are traitors, and they are probably bribed to the hilt by Iran.."

Hello Admin, let's raise the bar here on Iranian.com. We are not talking about chicks in bikinis gone wild here! 


Soosan Khanoom

Thank you Maryam Jan

by Soosan Khanoom on

I am determined to do so once I am back to the U.S ...  

Thanks again  : ) 


Maryam Hojjat

SH, welcome Back

by Maryam Hojjat on

I am looking forward to hear from your trip.


yolanda

...........

by yolanda on

Here is the guy on you-tube:

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVAWY916Si0

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmKJCpY7Oxw&feature=related

Wikipedia says his religion is Judaism.

Here is the excerpt from wikipedia:

//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Klayman

"Klayman recently came under heavy scrutiny and criticism from readers of his World Net Daily column after calling President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton traitors for not attacking Iran and advocating the use of nuclear weapons on Tehran, even though much of the criticism comes from people who are also critical of the Obama administration's foreign policies.[8]"


Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

Get a brain

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on

 

Hey Larry you need to clam down. Do you understand the implications of nukes. It will spread radioactivity from India to Israel and beyond. Including China; Russia and many other nations. 

Yes the Islamic Republic is a problem and has to go. But use of nuclear weapons is not the way to go. The repercussions are beyond imagination even if there is no retaliation. If nothing what is there to stop Russia using it on Chechnya.

Do you really think Obama and Hillary are in pay of IRI? If so you are delusional. If you are serious about nukes you are also a psychopath. You sir are insane and need immediate medical help. People like you are fit for horror movies not reality.

 


P_T_B_A

And one more thing ...

by P_T_B_A on

You can kiss my ugly hairy behind, Larry boy!


P_T_B_A

As Gary Sick said ...

by P_T_B_A on

"Those who suggest that a U.S. military confrontation with Iran would be surgical, limited, and one-sided are many of the same people who eight years ago assured you that the invasion of Iraq would be a cakewalk."


Soosan Khanoom

Nuke Iran? !!!

by Soosan Khanoom on

How do you even dare to show up on an Iranian site and talk about  killing Iranians in such an inhuman manner?  With or without IRI,  we have innocent Iranian people who are living there ...  

Shame on you !  Try Isreal.com you may find some people overthere to impress !!!!!


Maryam Hojjat

Larry, NOT NUking IRAN!

by Maryam Hojjat on

US has done once.  Sergical attack must not be nuclear attack.  Hear me LARRY.  I am opposing nuking any country incluing IRAN with IRR.


Maryam Hojjat

Indeed , The Only Solution is sergical Strike

by Maryam Hojjat on

To remove these bastard from surface of earth. 


Maryam Hojjat

Larry, Great truthful points about IRR/IRI

by Maryam Hojjat on

As an Iranian American I agree with sergical strike in order to Free IRAN, IRANIANS & world.  Hopefully It removes the Cancer & Thugs.  


A as Abbas

Who is Larry Klayman?

by A as Abbas on

"Larry Elliot Klayman (born July 20, 1951) is an American attorney and activist. He is known as the founder and former Chairman of Judicial Watch, a public interest and non-profit law firm, which attained notoriety through the initiation of 18 civil lawsuits against the Clinton Administration, and later an unsuccessful lawsuit against Vice-President Dick Cheney in order to obtain information about the White House's energy task force..."

Read more here from Wikipedia >>>