Documents on the Relationship Between Trita Parsi and VF Regime Official

Masoud Kazemzadeh
by Masoud Kazemzadeh
22-Jul-2011
 

Documents on the Relationship Between Trita Parsi and VF Regime High Official

The following documents show the many contacts between Dr. Trita Parsi and the Terrorist Regime High Official. Javad Zarif was at the time the HIGHEST RANKED OFFICIAL of the Terrorist Regime outside Iran. Zarif was the terrorist regime’s ambassador to the UN.

 

http://www.iranian-americans.com/docs/zarif/1983Germany.pdf

http://www.iranian-americans.com/docs/zarif/WHmoves.pdf

http://www.iranian-americans.com/docs/Part3/REGilchrest.pdf

http://www.iranian-americans.com/docs/zarif/ReBlair.pdf

http://www.iranian-americans.com/docs/zarif/Dorood.pdf

http://www.iranian-americans.com/docs/zarif/Salam.pdf

http://www.iranian-americans.com/docs/zarif/salam5.pdf

http://www.iranian-americans.com/docs/Part3/UNEnvoy-Bolton.pdf

 

there are more documents here:

http://english.iranianlobby.com/page1.php?id=66

 

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from Masoud Kazemzadeh
 
vildemose

MK jon: LOL A good

by vildemose on

MK jon: LOL

A good nickname for you and thanks again.


Masoud Kazemzadeh

Dear Vildamose, Thank you

by Masoud Kazemzadeh on

Dear Vildemose,

I fully agree with you.  Call me "pro-democracy" subversive.

:-)

Thank you.  And you are welcomed. 

Best,

Masoud

 


MM

Dear Professor

by MM on

The main reason I throw those questions at you was to show you the frugality/silliness of the questions you toss at various folks around here like we are your students and IC is your classroom.  Especially when you combine them with the "yes" or "no" clause.

To make matters worse, you do not stop there and make up more questions from our answers and here we go again.  I could have done the same with your answers, but I will not.  Like the old cowboy said: "This ain't my first rodeo".

If you argue rationally based on good references and give concise answers without filling a whole blog-page every time, we can discuss things, otherwise, you can ignore me and that will not bother me a bid.


Masoud Kazemzadeh

Basic Info on JM and INF-A

by Masoud Kazemzadeh on

MM,

I have been ignoring YOU because from the get-go, instead of engaging in civil debate with logic and evidence, YOU have been making personal attacks and insults. I will make an exception in this blog and answer your questions.

 

 

Ari/MM:  "The secular Jebheh-ye Melli was banned in Iran in 1982 for apostasy and its leaders had to flee the country. Adib Boroumand, however, is currently in Iran and politcally active unhindered by the regime. Three years ago he gifted a Koran to Iran's national library, according to his own bio page. "

 

MK: Ari is wrong. JM was banned in 1981 after Khomeini called us "apostate." Our members were arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and a few executed. Several left Iran. Later on many of JM leaders included Dr. Ali Ardalan and Adib Boroumand re-organized the JM. Initially, they created another group calls "Gorohe Hosne Neyyat" [Good Will Group]. It included mostly JM members, but also many from Nehzat Azadi and Melli Mazhabis. Dr. Ardalan the no. 1 leader of JM and Grouhe Hosne Neyyat was imprisoned and soooooooo badly tortured that he suffered 2 heart attacks under torture.

Actually Mr. Jamal Doroodi and Zaim were also involved in the Gorouh Hosne Neyyat.

The PRESENT JM is the same as the JM before the revolution and after the revolution. There is no such thing as "secular JM" vs. some other thing. Ari is absolutely wrong.

Several member of the JM have been targets of cars and motorcycles purposefully targeting them and hitting them on the day of official meetings or a day before the meetings. JM’s members including Mr. Boroumand has been under surveillance and Ministry of Intelligence harassments (in person as well as by phone) and intimidations.

 

 

Ari/MM:  "Opposed by MK's group, Koroush Zaim is standing against the regime while Adib Boroumand ("strongly supported" by MK's group) seems to have an understanding with the regime to allow the #1 leader to stay out of jail and further to gift a Koran to the national library, apparently with no political consequences for the library's management."

 

 

MK: Actually, Mr. Zaim wrote a public letter to Ahmadinejad when he became President and gave him advice on policies. Many of us were shocked and upset.

Mr. Boroumand is in his 90s. The regime probably is hoping that he dies naturally instead of being murdered in Evin prison. I do not think that making a gift of the Koran to the national library is cause to be taken to Evin prison.

ALL of these individuals are in the same organization. The fight began about 3 or 4 months ago when the small group led by Mr. Zaim was not able to gain the leadership of the JM. It appears that Mr. Zaim has been gathering individuals around himself in order to get rid of the actual leaders of the JM and make himself the no.1 leader.

 

 

MM: Based on Ari's investigative reporting (excerpts above) in http://iranian.com/main/blog/masoud-kazemzadeh/ms-shifteh-ansari-questions-pmoi-and-niac that your faction of Jebheh-ye Melli is free and active in Iran while the "real/other" Jebheh-ye Melli leaders are in jail, several questions have popped up here.

 

MK: This is false. Many of JM members have been sent to prison who are strong supporters of Mr. Boroumand.

Mr. Zaim and Mr. Doroodi were imprisoned and then freed. Right now, both are free. Mr. Ashkan Razavi is free.

 

 

 

MM: * When were you going to tell us that your faction is not the real/original Jebheh-ye Melli, or that it is the other Jebheh-ye Melli?

 

 

MK: The premise of the question is 100% false. As my post earlier stated our INF was established in the early 1960s. It was REAL and official.

The other INF faction was established by Admiral Dr. Madani and initially was referred to as "Yaran" [Friends]. Later on they adopted the name Jebhe Melli Iran. They also have the right to call themselves real and official. They have many decent and democratic members. Many of their members are my close and dear friends.

BOTH factions are real and official. As a rule, each does what it want to do. They might continue their work separately, or in some future date unify.

 

As a rule, each faction ignores that other one. As a rule, we try not to comment on each other.

 

 

MM: * Have your leaders (#1 Adib Boroumand) in Iran called IRI a terror state and called for her destruction?

 

MK: Mr. Boroumand is a sane man. WHY should he say something that would cause an immediate arrest and execution or assassination?????? He lives in Tehran, heloooooooooo.

 

 

MM: * When are you going to publish the documents / exchanges between your wing of "JM" in Iran and IRI officials?

The Ministry of Intelligence does drag our members and interrogates them and tries to intimidate them. Our brave members have not been intimidated and continue to work despite threats to their lives. Some times they cross the "red line" and pay the price and sometimes they prefer to show restraint and avoid conflict.

 

 

MM: * Does your "JM" faction support Velayat-e Faghih and Islamic Republic of Iran concept? Is that how your faction of "Jebheh-ye Melli" has managed to survive the onslaught of the IRI thugs in Iran while the real JM leaders are in Iranian jails? If no, then what arrangements has your faction made with the IRI thugs to stay afloat and unharmed in Iran?

 

 

MK: The JM inside Iran 100% opposed the Velayat Faqih. The JM inside 100% opposed the VF constitution. JM wants to establish democracy in Iran. As a matter of FACT, our slogan is on the FRONT page of our publication in large font in every single issue. It states: Esteghrar Hakemiyat Melli Hadaf Jebhe Melli Iran Ast" [The Establishment of Democracy in the Goal of the JM]. Here is the latest issue of the publication of JM inside Iran:

http://jebhemelli.net/htdocs/publications/payam/2011/184.pdf

 

Again, you are WRONG. The LEADERS of JM are the REAL JM. They have been members and leaders of JM for more than 40 years, before and after the revolution. Mr. Boroumand has been part of the JM from the time of Dr. Mossadegh and his government.

They are brave human beings who have placed their own lives and liberties on the line against one of the most savage regimes in human history. Many of our members have been killed and imprisoned, and tortured. And still these brave human being continue to struggle. Just read the editorial (first page) and see how brave these human beings are who publish these and risk their lives.

 

 

MM: * What would you do if exchanges between your leaders and IRI officials were published, even if they are courteous exchanges?

 

MK: Would read them. If I saw that JM members were providing help to the VF regime, I would strongly CONDEMN them and distance myself from it.

In my opinion, it is one thing to be in Iran when your life is threatened and totally different when one lives in the U.S. and is safe from the terrorist regime. In my opinion, it is one thing to say salaam to your interrogator from the Ministry of Intelligence when you are dragged in for interrogation. In my opinion, it is totally different when you live in the U.S. to take the initiative, make appointment with officials of the terrorist regime, exchange analysis, and exchange in friendly stuff.

 

Masoud


vildemose

MK: thank you for all your

by vildemose on

MK: thank you for all your relentless attemp to provide a fresh perspective on all things political.  I just wanted you to know that I'm grateful for your analytical and informative posts.

People who think and question authorities and 'conventional wisdom' are always going to be viewed as 'subversives'. In fact, thinking and questioning are the two most subversive acts by those who support IRI or are in its leadership.


Masoud Kazemzadeh

Vildemose jaan

by Masoud Kazemzadeh on

Dear Vildemose,

Thank you. I am waiting. Apparently, no one is able to provide any answers (so far at least).

Best,

Masoud


MM

Collusion, Cooperation or just a blind eye!

by MM on

"The secular Jebheh-ye Melli was banned in Iran in 1982 for apostasy and its leaders had to flee the country. Adib Boroumand, however, is currently in Iran and politcally active unhindered by the regime. Three years ago he gifted a Koran to Iran's national library, according to his own bio page. " 

"Opposed by MK's group, Koroush Zaim is standing against the regime while Adib Boroumand ("strongly supported" by MK's group) seems to have an understanding with the regime to allow the #1 leader to stay out of jail and further to gift a Koran to the national library, apparently with no political consequences for the library's management."

--------

Based on Ari's investigative reporting (excerpts above) in http://iranian.com/main/blog/masoud-kazemzadeh/ms-shifteh-ansari-questions-pmoi-and-niac that your faction of Jebheh-ye Melli is free and active in Iran while the "real/other" Jebheh-ye Melli leaders are in jail, several questions have popped up here.  

* When were you going to tell us that your faction is not the real/original Jebheh-ye Melli, or that it is the other Jebheh-ye Melli?

* Have your leaders (#1 Adib Boroumand) in Iran called IRI a terror state and called for her destruction?

* When are you going to publish the documents / exchanges between your wing of "JM" in Iran and IRI officials?

* Does your "JM" faction support Velayat-e Faghih and Islamic Republic of Iran concept?  Is that how your faction of "Jebheh-ye Melli" has managed to survive the onslaught of the IRI thugs in Iran while the real JM leaders are in Iranian jails?  If no, then what arrangements has your faction made with the IRI thugs to stay afloat and unharmed in Iran?

* What would you do if exchanges between your leaders and IRI officials were published, even if they are courteous exchanges?

Please........... no half/full page responses with lots of dead space in between.  Short and concise answers will suffice.


vildemose

Dear MK: Those are

by vildemose on

Dear MK: Those are excellent questions. Hopefully, someone will be able to answer them for us.

 


Masoud Kazemzadeh

Questions on American Law and Practice

by Masoud Kazemzadeh on

 

I do not know what the rules are today in regards to the following. If anyone has answers, please provide them. I do not know the actual law and practice. I would be grateful if someone who knows to provide some info on this issue.

1. For example, if a U.S. citizen (or green card holder) born in Saudi Arabia exchanged friendly e-mails with Osama bin Laden or Zawahiri, or a high ranked official of al Qaeda, what would the FBI do?

2. For example, if a U.S. citizen of Palestinian background exchanged e-mails with Khaled Meshaal (the leader of Hamas residing in Syria), what would the FBI do?

3. For example, if a U.S. citizen of Lebanese background exchanged e-mails with a high ranked leader of the Lebanese Hezbollah, what would the FBI do?

4. For example, if a U.S. citizen (or green card holder) born in Saudi Arabia provided information, analysis, and advice to Osama bin Laden or Zawahiri, or a high ranked official of al Qaeda, what would the FBI do?

5. For example, if a U.S. citizen of Palestinian background provided information, analysis, and advice to Khaled Meshaal (the leader of Hamas residing in Syria), what would the FBI do?

6. For example, if a U.S. citizen of Lebanese provided information, analysis, and advice to a high ranked leader of the Lebanese Hezbollah, what would the FBI do?

Thanks,

Masoud

 


Masoud Kazemzadeh

PTBA

by Masoud Kazemzadeh on

PTBA,

1. Could you please explain what YOU regard as "smoking gun"?

2. In your opinion, which of the following describes the connection between Trita Parsi and the Highest Ranked Official of the TERRORIST regime?

a. brain storming on strategy and tactics to benefit the IRI

b. exchanging hostile words on the lack of democracy and human rights in Iran

c. providing each other information (but no analysis on how best to do this or that action that would benefit the IRI)

d. ___________ (fill in the blank as you so desire)

e. condemning the terrorist actions of the IRI

 

3. It is the role of American officials (in executive and legislative branches) in their official capacities to meet officials of other countries including hostile ones.

If during the Cold War, a person from one of the executive agencies (e.g., State, NSC, CIA), without the authorization of his/her superiors exchanged friendly mails and exchanged similar things with the Soviet Ambassador to the UN, I believe that he or she might be investigated by the FBI (for potential espionage or collaboration with the enemy). If I am wrong, please correct me. I do not know the actual law and practice. I would be grateful if someone who knows to provide some info on this issue.

 

Best,

Masoud 

 


P_T_B_A

Where is the smoking gun?

by P_T_B_A on

A lot of US senators met with Zarif too during his tenure, so what?

 I am with you Soosan khanoom. 


Masoud Kazemzadeh

Dear Arash and AI

by Masoud Kazemzadeh on

Dear arash,

You are welcomed.

Best,

MK

 

=================================

Dear Artificial Intelligence,

You are most welcomed.

Best regards,

Masoud

 


Soosan Khanoom

Excellent argument here done by Parsi

by Soosan Khanoom on

According to Likud Leader Benyamin Netanyahu, it is 1938 and Iran is Germany. And of course, Ahmadinejad is Hitler, he goes on to imply. Bibi’s analogy is very powerful and effective – yet false and tremendously dangerous. As I explain on the blog of Tony Karon (Time Magazine), not only is the analogy aimed at preventing diplomacy and making war with Iran inevitable, the ever so opportunistic Netanyahu played a remarkably different role. 

only ten years ago when he ordered Israel to tone down its rhetoric on Iran and sought to quietly open up to Tehran. 

A portion of the article and a link to the full article can be found below.  

PS. This episode in Israeli-Iranian relations is explained in even greater detail in “Treacherous Alliance – The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran and the US.” 

 

  Masoud thanks ...... the more I read about NIAC the more I like them and, by the way, your last article is written by Dai ....... oh please not again  

Artificial Intelligence

Thank you Masoud!

by Artificial Intelligence on

I keep on asking why the Double standard by NIAC. The answe I get is "this is not about NIAC its obout the MEK"!!!!


arash Irandoost

Thank you

by arash Irandoost on

But will they read and are they listening?