Conspiracy scenario and fake results of Iranian elections

Share/Save/Bookmark

Mohanned
by Mohanned
03-Jul-2009
 

Most totalitarian dictatorial regimes use the same manner in dealing with their peoples when they see these peoples started protest the dictatorial policies of these regimes. when these totalitarian regimes see getting their citizens out to streets to protest their dictatorial policies, these regimes start alarm announcing that there is external conspiracy try to rush the people to rebelling against the regime thereby these regimes work on creating scenario of existence fake external enemy to delude their citizens that there is external conspiracy is fed by foreigner countries to shaking the national interior security and stop the citizens in demanding with their civil rights same this scenario we see happen for most totalitarian dictatorial regimes around the world, same this scenario these regimes use when they see their peoples started in protest for demand with their civil rights realizing how far the forgery and lying these totalitarian regimes acted on them, and same this scenario happens now in Iran where once Islamic regime found that Iranian people discovered the forgery in final elections results and started protest these fake results, Islamic regime hurried up in accusing the British and United States in standing behind getting crowds of Iranian protesters out to streets for protest these fake results of elections.

It is big shame on Islamic regime and supreme leader, Khamanei when they stated that British and United States are responsible for creating these protests in Iranian street and getting hundreds of thousands of Iranians out to streets for protest fake results of elections because it is ironic matter for Islamic regime to make the will of Iranian people propelled by foreigner countries such as British or United States. Thereby Islamic regime affronted his people when it alleged that British and United States are who propelled Iranian protesters to getting out to streets for protest results of elections. supreme leader, Khamanei when he accused British in standing behind arranging these protests, he gave the right to himself to say that British and US decide the fate of Iranians on their behalf, but supreme leader, Khamanei didn’t realize well that free peoples like Persian nation are who decide their fate by themselves and it is impossible to be propelled by other foreigner countries to decide on their behalf.

Supreme leader, Khamnei didn’t care of how far the insult he directed to Iranian protesters when he accused British government that it is responsible for propelling them to streets to arranging these protests as much as he just care for keeping his throne over Iranians.

Supreme leader, Khamanei wanted abortion the protests in Iran alleging that external sides stood behind arranging these protests to turn the sights of Iranian street from the fake results of these elections and give the right to his regime to suppressing these protests deluding the people that there is external danger threatens Iran behind these protests and it is required unifying the lines to address that alleged danger, but supreme leader couldn’t to delude the Iranians with that fake scenario where protests kept continuous in Iranian streets after his release in spite of using the brutal means by Islamic regime to suppressing the protesters to stopping these protests.

Most totalitarian regimes like Islamic regime work on creating external conspiracy scenario fed by foreign countries when they see their citizens started demand with their civil rights and realize how far the lying and forgery of their totalitarian regimes.

Share/Save/Bookmark

 
Mohanned

Thank you

by Mohanned on

Thank you for your comment. I would like tell you that my style in writing is very difrent than Great writer, Marcel Proust. I focus on one point in my article this point always is the subject of my article. my articles is very simple and tries to explain the idea I want communicate to people. I focus on just one idea and use diffrent means to explain this idea to people, but I have no talent to write evryday an article or so I just write an article when some idea about some events operates in my mind, and then I try to explain to people about this idea.  


Ari Siletz

Our own Proust

by Ari Siletz on

Mohanned,

I understood both your meaning and tone. I even agree with your point. And just to challenge you in your style of writing, pasted below is a single sentence by the great French writer Marcel Proust. See if you can best it's length in your next article.

"Their honour precarious, their liberty provisional, lasting only until the discovery of their crime; their position unstable, like that of the poet who one day was feasted at every table, applauded in every theatre in London, and on the next was driven from every lodging, unable to find a pillow upon which to lay his head, turning the mill like Samson and saying like him: "The two sexes shall die, each in a place apart!"; excluded even, save on the days of general disaster when the majority rally round the victim as the Jews rallied round Dreyfus, from the sympathy--at times from the society--of their fellows, in whom they inspire only disgust at seeing themselves as they are, portrayed in a mirror which, ceasing to flatter them, accentuates every blemish that they have refused to observe in themselves, and makes them understand that what they have been calling their love (a thing to which, playing upon the word, they have by association annexed all that poetry, painting, music, chivalry, asceticism have contrived to add to love) springs not from an ideal of beauty which they have chosen but from an incurable malady; like the Jews again (save some who will associate only with others of their race and have always on their lips ritual words and consecrated pleasantries), shunning one another, seeking out those who are most directly their opposite, who do not desire their company, pardoning their rebuffs, moved to ecstasy by their condescension; but also brought into the company of their own kind by the ostracism that strikes them, the opprobrium under which they have fallen, having finally been invested, by a persecution similar to that of Israel, with the physical and moral characteristics of a race, sometimes beautiful, often hideous, finding (in spite of all the mockery with which he who, more closely blended with, better assimilated to the opposing race, is relatively, in appearance, the least inverted, heaps upon him who has remained more so) a relief in frequenting the society of their kind, and even some corroboration of their own life, so much so that, while steadfastly denying that they are a race (the name of which is the vilest of insults), those who succeed in concealing the fact that they belong to it they readily unmask, with a view less to injuring them, though they have no scruple about that, than to excusing themselves; and, going in search (as a doctor seeks cases of appendicitis) of cases of inversion in history, taking pleasure in recalling that Socrates was one of themselves, as the Israelites claim that Jesus was one of them, without reflecting that there were no abnormals when homosexuality was the norm, no anti-Christians before Christ, that the disgrace alone makes the crime because it has allowed to survive only those who remained obdurate to every warning, to every example, to every punishment, by virtue of an innate disposition so peculiar that it is more repugnant to other men (even though it may be accompanied by exalted moral qualities) than certain other vices which exclude those qualities, such as theft, cruelty, breach of faith, vices better understood and so more readily excused by the generality of men; forming a freemasonry far more extensive, more powerful and less suspected than that of the Lodges, for it rests upon an identity of tastes, needs, habits, dangers, apprenticeship, knowledge, traffic, glossary, and one in which the members themselves, who intend not to know one another, recognise one another immediately by natural or conventional, involuntary or deliberate signs which indicate one of his congeners to the beggar in the street, in the great nobleman whose carriage door he is shutting, to the father in the suitor for his daughter's hand, to him who has sought healing, absolution, defence, in the doctor, the priest, the barrister to whom he has had recourse; all of them obliged to protect their own secret but having their part in a secret shared with the others, which the rest of humanity does not suspect and which means that to them the most wildly improbable tales of adventure seem true, for in this romantic, anachronistic life the ambassador is a bosom friend of the felon, the prince, with a certain independence of action with which his aristocratic breeding has furnished him, and which the trembling little cit would lack, on leaving the duchess's party goes off to confer in private with the hooligan; a reprobate part of the human whole, but an important part, suspected where it does not exist, flaunting itself, insolent and unpunished, where its existence is never guessed; numbering its adherents everywhere, among the people, in the army, in the church, in the prison, on the throne; living, in short, at least to a great extent, in a playful and perilous intimacy with the men of the other race, provoking them, playing with them by speaking of its vice as of something alien to it; a game that is rendered easy by the blindness or duplicity of the others, a game that may be kept up for years until the day of the scandal, on which these lion-tamers are devoured; until then, obliged to make a secret of their lives, to turn away their eyes from the things on which they would naturally fasten them, to fasten them upon those from which they would naturally turn away, to change the gender of many of the words in their vocabulary, a social constraint, slight in comparison with the inward constraint which their vice, or what is improperly so called, imposes upon them with regard not so much now to others as to themselves, and in such a way that to themselves it does not appear a vice."


rosie is roxy is roshan

Why are you being so rude?

by rosie is roxy is roshan on

Don't you remember when you or your friends or family had to learn English?

He is making the point that for the Regime to blame the events before and after the election, these conspiracy theories about foreign elements being responsible, is an insult to the Iranian people's intelligence and their capacity to be autonomous, to determine their own fates. It's a very sophisticated point and he has a lot of courage to do it while he is just learning English, a lot of character.

And instead of supporting him you are being impatient and you MPD are cursing. What's your beef? Are you so upset about what's happening in Iran that you are displacing your frustration onto him? Well guess what? By writing this blog in English he is trying very hard to DO something about it.

Okay, fine, it's lovely that you tried to correct it for him and that Ayhab told him he needed to correct it. It would be very encouraging if you weren;t being...o obnoxious..

Chill man, will you? The guy's been a member for three days. Can't you put yourself in his shoes and try to make him feel comfortable?

I SAID I a;ready did the corrections. oksy? No one else has to do them,

Thanks for trying but...chill.

Mohanned, ignore them. They are just both on the rag today.

(having their menstrual period LOL).

:o(

r.


Multiple Personality Disorder

Fuck it man

by Multiple Personality Disorder on

I gave up on reading this blog or trying to correct it for him.


rosie is roxy is roshan

Mohanned, Ayhab...

by rosie is roxy is roshan on

del


capt_ayhab

Rosie

by capt_ayhab on

I am no editor, but without punctuation the whole article is impossible to follow.

And when are we going to catch our wale?..... ;-0)

-YT 


rosie is roxy is roshan

Why don't you help him edit it, Ayhab..

by rosie is roxy is roshan on

and then ask j. to refeature it?

After all, it's mainly punctuation we're talking about here, dude..I mean if you can count 'em you can punctuate 'em. Go ahead. Make yourself useful. lol

---------------

I told you, Cap'n, we'll catch that great white whale yet..

lol


capt_ayhab

mohanned

by capt_ayhab on

Did you notice that your entire blog has only 5 sentences?

One sentence in first paragraph, 2 in second, and one in each 3rd , 4th and 5th paragraph.

Dude try making short sentences if you want anyone to understand your writing.

-YT