A Bewildered Conscience Blindly Groping for Clarity : Dissent is the Only Response to Manufactured Realities
Rapture and Apocalypse: How Real is the Evangelical Hold on U.S. Foreign Policy?
That religion plays a prominent role in American politics is undeniable. The pollsters at the Pew Research Center have found that 85% of Americans regard religion as an important part of their lives. Moreover, the separation of religion from the political sphere doesn’t feature highly on their list of priorities. In the same set of polls, 70% of Americans stated they desire their President to be a person of faith.
Several presidents have been unabashed in their use of religious nomenclature, symbolism and allusion. Edifying homilies, packed with open professions of faith by Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and more recently George W. Bush were inveterate features of their respective presidencies. Though the separation of church and state remains the writ of the land, recent decades have seen a resurgence in religiosity and, to use a somewhat oxymoronic phrase, “postmodern-revival” of the role of religion in public life, whereby ancient symbols are refashioned and packaged to suit contemporary needs and agendas. An unrepresentative, but powerful coalition of groups have since the eighties been aggressively pursuing their politico-theological program with a hitherto unparalleled vigor. Though the situation is hardly as alarming as some commentators would have us believe, there is little doubt that the Christian Evangelical movement has emerged as a powerful and highly influential group with a wish-list they expect their political representatives to translate into policy.
Leaders of this movement include the late Jerry Falwell, Gary Bauer, Pat Robertson and John Hagee, and politicians such as former House Majority Leaders Tom DeLay (R-TX) and Richard Armey (R-TX), and Senator James Inhofe (R-K). The growing pervasiveness and political tenor of televangelism, e-vangelism (internet-vangelism) and religious activism have been part and parcel of the aforementioned trend and its recent buoyancy. The pervasive influence of the Christian Right is by no means a figment of “liberal America’s” imagination. In fact it’s very real, with some experts contending the provenance of American exceptionalism and unilateralism is to be found in Evangelism and its political cognates. For example, Professor Duane Oldfield of Knox College has argued that:
“Although the Christian right's unilateralism is not new, its proximity to power is. Three developments have helped make the Christian right a significant player in U.S. foreign policy: the election of a president with close ties to the movement, the growth of the Christian right's grassroots organizational strength, and the development of an alliance with neoconservatives, who have come to play a crucial role in the present administration.”
An important subset of the politically-minded Christian Right are the so-called Christian Zionists. The origins of Christian Zionism reside in the theology of dispensationalism which emerged in nineteenth century England, largely through the efforts of Anglican ministers Louis Way and John Nelson Darby. Dispensationalism constitutes a form of premillenarianism which asserts that the world will experience an era of turmoil, hardship and catastrophe before Christ returns.
The Evangelist community’s theological predilections have precipitated foreign policy preferences consisting in unerring support for Israel and a tendency to view the Bush administration’s “war on terror” as a war against Islam. Pastor John Hagee, for instance has unapologetically proclaimed that, “We support Israel because all other nations were created by an act of men, but Israel was created by an act of God!”
The Iraq War is seen as integral to a Manichean struggle of “good versus evil” and despite the precipitous decline in support for the war amongst the American public, Christian Zionists remain stalwart supporters of the Bush administration’s Babylonian adventure, viewing it through the prism of a cosmic and eschatological struggle. Attitudes toward other religions and Islam in particular have been characterized by prejudice, falsehood and misconception. Surveys taken by the Pew Forum (PDF), furthermore, show that of all Americans, Evangelicals have the most negative and derogatory views of Islam and Muslims. Reverend Franklin Graham, a leading Evangelist created a stir when after the 9/11 attacks he infamously claimed that Islam was a "very evil and a very wicked religion."
The Christian Zionists support for Israel is a curious and uneasy one. Evangelist support for Israel first really gathered pace after the Six Day War (1967), in which Israel single-handedly defeated the armies of Jordan, Egypt and Syria and occupied East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. These events were interpreted as a sign that the realization of Old and New Testament prophecy was in the offing.
Ever since, a slew of Christian Zionist groups have been extremely vocal in their support of the Jewish state and the settlement enterprise, even raising funds to expedite settlement expansion. Their belief that God has promised Israel to the Jews, and the Jews alone has meant that they are fundamentally at odds with the international consensus which advocates a two-state solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
The reason why such an alliance might be deemed uneasy and fraught with contradictions is because dispensationalist theology doesn’t envisage a pleasant fate for the Jews. Dispensationalist theology assures us that when the end-of-times are upon us that the Jews, who are crudely typecast in the Evangelicals’ literalist Biblical narrative, will either convert to Christianity or die! Hence, despite their staunch and unreserved support for Israel, critics suggest that such support only thinly veils a deep-seated brand of anti-Semitism.
This rather strange marriage of convenience is perhaps best exemplified in the person of Pastor John Hagee, whose endorsement was wholeheartedly embraced by Republican presidential nominee, John McCain, earlier this year. Despite being founder of lobbying organization Christians United for Israel (CUFI), he has been widely accused of anti-Semitism. In his 2006 book Jerusalem Countdown Hagee argues that:
"It was the disobedience and rebellion of the Jews, God's chosen people, to their covenantal responsibility to serve only the one true God, Jehovah, that gave rise to the opposition and persecution that they experienced beginning in Canaan and continuing to this very day..."
Hagee effectively puts down thousands of years of persecution, which culminated in the Judaeocide and near-destruction of European Jewry, to what he perceives as the Jews disobedience and deviance from the anointed path of Hagee’s infinitely vengeful God. Despite such utterances, prominent figures in the American-Jewish community such as Abraham Foxman, chairman of the Anti-Demfamation League (ADL), have been quick to jump to Hagee and the equally offensive pronouncements of other Evangelical leaders’ defense. In the words of Foxman, “There is a role for him…because of his support for Israel.”
The Evangelicals have also been jockeying for broadening the present conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan to Iran. Hagee’s CUFI has been zealously pushing the message of “support-Israel-bomb-Iran”, urging Congress to follow suit and has told his followers that a US strike on Tehran may initiate the sequence of apocalyptic events related in Ezekiel 38 and 39. In Jerusalem Countdown he goes so far as to argue that “The coming nuclear showdown with Iran is a certainty”.
Such dogma obviously leaves no room for negotiation or painstaking diplomacy. It’s not merely the belief that the end-of-days is upon us which must been seen off, but that dangerous fantasy that Armageddon must be instigated and provoked via a series of explosive and catastrophic events. Apart from being dangerous in and of themselves, such ideas, even in infinitesimal quantities can act as an damning impediments in the pursuit of peaceful solutions to what are after all mundane geopolitical issues.
There is however consensus amongst experts that the Christian Evangelical movement cannot be viewed as a monolith. Though there are of course ideological and philosophical commonalities which bind them together, there are also issues which divide them such as global warming and HIV/AIDS.
There is also the trenchant counterargument that despite appearances, the American policy elite’s support for Israel and the neocon agenda in pursuit of American hegemony exist independently of Evangelical lobbying efforts, and on the contrary remain entirely contingent on geo-strategic considerations. Well-known advocates of a position somewhat analogous to this are Noam Chomsky of MIT and Norman G. Finkelstein, both of whom take issue with the thesis proposed in John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt’s, The Israel Lobby i.e. that it is the lobby and its activities on Capitol Hill which are the key factor capable of explaining American policy toward Israel and the broader Middle East. To oversimplify somewhat, they argue that when all is said and done, it is America’s geo-strategic interests which take precedence over all else and thereby go on to determine policy, with ideology, theology and the lobby in the final instance falling by the wayside, playing only the most negligible of roles. Evangelicals rather have been cast in the role of “useful idiots” mobilizing their followers on the basis of hollow campaign promises, dutifully shepherding their flocks to the ballot box.
There is little doubt however that those politically-active Evangelicals whose world-view and activities we have here briefly attempted to explicate, will be a force to be reckoned with for the foreseeable future; further confirmed by the fact that the first general-election meeting between Obama and McCain will not be taking place in a university auditorium, with news anchors as moderators, but in the unorthodox locale of an Evangelical mega-church, overseen by a southern Baptist pastor. The presidential hopefuls may well find themselves compelled to indulge in catechism as opposed to the usual interrogatory welter of questions. Thus despite various mitigating factors worthy of greater exploration, there is little doubt that analysts and observers of American foreign policy will be struggling to assess the role of Christian Evangelicals for some time to come.
© Sadegh Kabeer
If possible try check out the short documentary, Pastor John Hagee: A Preoccupation with the Jews, by jewsonfirst.org...
URL: //www.jewsonfirst.org >
Recently by sadegh | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Optimism and Nightmares | 2 | Jun 18, 2009 |
The Quest for Authenticity | 6 | Mar 18, 2009 |
Thirty Years On | 39 | Feb 01, 2009 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Yeah FK, How you manage
by sadegh on Sun Aug 17, 2008 05:20 AM PDTYeah FK,
How you manage to pack so much irrelevant stupidity into such a small space is really remarkable...
Thousands of man-hours on opinion polls done by Pew and others categorically belie you fictional figure. The figure that I initially cite is from Time magazine go get a clue please. REGARDING THE FIGURES: TIME MAGAZINE AND PEW ONE OF THE LEADING OPINION POLLSTERS IN THE ENTIRE WORLD ARE "LEFTISTS" WHO "TWIST THE TRUTH". PEOPLE PLEASE NOTE FOR THE FUTURE THAT FK HAS NO RESPECT FOR ANYTHING EXCEPT THAT WHICH CONFIRMS HIS DISTORTED VIEW OF REALITY.
ALSO, STOP DISTORTING MY ARGUMENT...I NEVER IDENTIFIED THE POLITICALLY MINDED EVANGELICAL MOVEMENT WITH AMERICANS or AMERICAN AS A WHOLE...AND I CLEARLY STATED THAT THEY ARE AN UNREPRESENTATIVE GROUP...YOUR INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY NEVER CEASES TO SURPRISE ME...
ALSO MAYBE READ THE ARTICLE BEFORE YOU WRITE INANE AND FICTIONAL RESPONSES...ALL I SAID IS THAT THERE HAS BEEN AN INCREASE IN RELIGIOUSITY IN THE US, JUST AS THERE HAS BEEN IN RECENT DECADES IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD...THE LIKES OF HAGEE ARE A MINORITY BUT THEY ARE RELEVANT AND WORTH DISCUSSING...IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ ABOUT THEM THEN DON'T READ MY BLOG ENTRY...I WAS LOOKING AT FOREIGN POLICY NOT DOMESTIC AFFAIRS (THEREFORE ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS ARE COMPLETELY REDUNDANT REGARDING RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, ABORTION AND SUCH, I NEVER EVER ADDRESSED THESE ISSUES AND NEVER QUESTIONED THEM) SO PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE NEXT TIME BEFORE YOU COMMENT. TAKE YOUR AXE AND GRING IT SOMEWHERE ELSE...YOU WILL NOT BE MISSED, TRUST ME...
ALSO I NEVER SAID AT ANY POINT THAT THERE WAS NO LONGER A SEPARATION OF RELIGION AND STATE IN THE US...WHERE DO YOU GET THIS RUBBISH FROM???!!!
The article is covering an issue which has appeared in mainstream publications like the NYT, Foreign Affairs and many others...it's looking at a certain cadre of political evangelists which EXTREME views and their influence (I clearly state that these guys aren't representative of Evangelism as a whole)...these are facts...this is not a critique of religion, christianity or even evangelism...it's an examination of a mass political movement in the US, which does have influence and does impact policy which consequently affects us all...especially those us in the Middle East!!! I can also send you a list of Harvard and Chicago profs who don't think this controversial either (though I know you only have contempt for anyone who dares disagree with you - what a fascistic mentality) - my argument doesn't really deviate from Mearsheimer (Chicago prof) and Walt's (Harvard prof) The Israel Lobby...it is a very real and pertinent issue and like I said has been covered by tons of mainstream publications...lots of think tanks like Foreign Policy in Focus and the Brookings Institute also...I even shied away from the more critical view points to be perfectly frank...a Putlizer prize winning journalist called Chris Hedges has written a book called 'American Facists' about the movement and it was an American bestseller...
SO TO REPEAT - GUYS LIKE HAGEE DO NOT REPRESENT AMERICANS, JUST LIKE MESBAH-YAZDI DOES NOT REPRESENT IRANIANS. THEY ARE AN EXTREME, ORGANIZED AND HIGHLY MOTIVATED GROUP WHO INFLUENCE AND IMPACT DECISION MAKERS - THOUGH AS I POINT OUT THERE IS A POWERFUL COUNTERARGUMENT WHICH CHALLENGES THIS CONTENTION. AMERICA'S TRADITION OF SECULARISM IS FOR THE MOST PART IN TACT AND IT CONTINUES TO BE THE WRIT OF THE LAND (AS I CLEARLY SAID). AND TO REPEAT FOR THE LAST TIME FK: I WAS LOOKING AT FOREIGN POLICY NOT DOMESTIC AFFAIRS SO PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE NEXT TIME BEFORE YOU COMMENT. IT WOULD SAVE US BOTH A GREAT DEAL OF TIME AND MAKE YOU LOOK A LOT LESS SILLY.
Ba Arezu-ye Movafaghiat, Sadegh
This isn't some "leftist
by skatermom (not verified) on Sat Aug 16, 2008 11:45 PM PDTThis isn't some "leftist propaganda". No our secular rights haven't been too violated...yet. thanks to our constitution. That line is starting to blur however. I have a child in the public school system. Believe me there are some crazy parents at our school who are very vocal. Instead of forking out some dough and sending their kids to a religious school they try and push policy to make our lives miserable. Unfortunately where we live the religious ones are the vocal ones and they do make changes in our city. These changes start from the cities and will expand to the federal level, if we're not careful. I've lived in my town for over 30 years and I can tell you that people here have become much more religious. DDE put god back in the pledge in the 50's. If he made that constitutional god knows what can happen. No pun intended.
I do agree with Farhad
by darius on Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:34 PM PDTI do agree with Farhad ,this is very much true .The Christian right doesnot constitute the majority of the American Christian's mind set .My wife is an American and practices her religion but she and many like her hardly believe or mind any of those Christian right .For many like her such groups are considered distorting the word of Bible .The truth about Farhad argument is that for every single American ,America comes first .That is not a false statement .But there is also a tendency of American policy to demand any one else in the world to abandon their patriotism and turn back to all their beliefs ,when America is asking for it. America because or her might and her status is demanding every one else to listen .
Farhad is also right about one's right to practice their faith.I sincerely
beleive that this country has done it, but also demands your commit ment as a good citizen .
When comes to Christian and Jewish ,youbetter beleive me they have nothing in common . Two different Theology .It is the Christianity ,who needs the Old Testamnet to prove The Jesus Christ .Judaism consider itself unicque independent and exclusive .For a true Christian right beleiver ,any Jew ultimately has to accept Jesus Christ .There is no way around it.The Christian right soon or late after they are done with Muslim willgo after The Son's of Abraham .
Maybe if you get out of the
by Farhad Kashani on Sat Aug 16, 2008 08:27 PM PDTMaybe if you get out of the bubble and explore the spirit of this country, you would realize how out of tuch with reality you have been. Even if religious Americans (Estimated at 30%) claim that religion is important to them, which they have all the right to, the same way Muslims, Jews, Atheists and others in America do, that doesn't mean they are not for separation of religion and state. You can be a religious person, but if youre raised in a democraic society like America, and at the same time be tolerant. Like I said, you have no idea how out of tuch you are.
I heard Fallwell, who is the face of religious America, said himself to Amanpour in a CNN interview, that he would vote for an atheist president if he is tough on national security. Is that how "religious Americans want religion in politics"? By voting for an atheist?
Who are you trying to fool?
America always inspired
by Farhad Kashani on Sat Aug 16, 2008 08:02 PM PDTAmerica always inspired the world for separation of church and state. None of these figures and claims mentined in this article is true. This is a clear attemt by leftist activists to twist the truth.
This country doesn't have an official religion, non religious concepts such as abortion and sex outside wedlock is allowed, all religions have the same rights as Christians do, and most, if not all, laws guarantee separation of religion and state.
Tell me as a non Christian Iranian living in America, which one of your religious rights have been violated by Christian Americans? Are you prohibited from practicing your religion? Are you prohibited from criticizing Christianity? The answer is clearly NO.
Who are you trying to fool?