Iran: Before and After 1979

Forget it

Forget it. Misunderstood.

More interesting data...

Pre- vs. Post revolution:

(1) $174 = iranian per capita income in 1953 when shah returned and took over the country.

(2) $2400 ($7200 in 2008 dollars) = iranian per capita income in 1979 when shah left.

(3) $1000 - $1800 = Iranian estimated per capita income in 2008.

(4) 13 = ranking of Iran on wealthiest countries list in 1974 according to IMF.

(5) 16 fold = Iranian GNP increase from 1963 to 1977 (from 340B rials to 5682B rials).

(6) 14% = Iranian savings compound growth rate from 1963 to 1977.

(7) $110B ($330b in 2008 dollars) = Total accumulated oil revenue for all years prior to 1979.

(8) $1T = Estimated total accumulated oil revenue from 1979 through 2008 (= $1000B).

(9) 14% = percent of Iranians that are better off under IRI in 2008 than under shah’s regime according to recent phone poll in iran taken from turkey.

Now you be the judge!

About revolution...

A. Milani was talking about few recently declassified docs on iranian revolution. He mentioned a heavily redacted corrspondence between khomeini and carter in which khomeini asks for cease of support for shah and allowing revolution to succeed in exchange for post-revolution iran to: (1) allow continued flow of oil to west, and (2) iran would act as a security buffer against soviets. In response, carter praises khomeini and welcomes him to iran.

You be the judge of what followed!

Some people here (the kids)

Some people here (the kids) need to grow up!
This is no babay-e man az babay-r tou bozorg-tareh, ghavi-tareh game!
LOOK AT THE HERE AND NOW.

The Henley Visa Restrictions Index

The Henley Visa Restrictions Index is a global ranking of countries according to travel freedom their citizens enjoy. This is another impressive contribution of IR to their respective citizens in today's world:

The Henley Visa Restrictions Index is a a global ranking of countries according to travel freedom their citizens enjoy. Henley & Partners has analyzed the visa regulations of all the countries and territories in the world. It has created an index which ranks countries according to the visa-free access its citizens enjoy to other countries. For the first time, a global ranking shows the international travel freedom of the citizens of the various countries as well as the international relations and status of individual countries cirelative to others.

The top rank is held by Finland, Denmark and the United States, with a score of 130 each (a score of 130 means that a citizen of, say, Finland, may enter 130 countries and territories without a visa).

They are followed by other European nations and Japan. Canada and New Zealand are joint 6 th together with Luxembourg and Austria. Singapore (8 th) ranks before Malaysia, which is ranked 9 th together with Iceland, Greece and Australia. Further down the scale one will find Turkey (46 th), Russia (62 nd, together with the United Arab Emirates), India (71 st ), and China (78 th).

Not surprisingly, Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan score lowest, i.e. their citizens have the least travel freedom.

Iraq's rank is 81 with 15 countries to travel without a visa requirement.

Iran's rank is 82 with 14 countries to travel without a Visa requirement.

Afghanistan's rank is 83 at the bottom of the list with 12 countries to travel without a visa requirement.

To KURDISH WARRIOR

Perhaps you misunderstood.

1. You are as much Iranian as me...I do not have any extra rights too and DO NOT WANT AND SHOULD AND EXPECT TO HAVE. That's the beauty of a real nation.

2. I also expressed my opinion

3. When I support a SECULAR TECHNOCRATIC SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT I must imply what you also looking for rather than a really outdated minset of thinking in tribal levels... WE ARE STRONG AS WE HHAVE BEEN WEAVON WITHIN EACHOTHER... This provides us a privilage like the USA has.

4. When you confront a secularist it is expected you as a person supportign the same system to know the fundamental of it is based on nothing like religion or the tribal background but eligibility and capabality to serve the most and the best to ONE NATION under the FLAG of ONE NATION STATE carrying over A COMMON HISTORICAL MEMORY for Thousands of Years Since the stablishment of the First Iraniand State Nation, be MEDEANS 2716 ago which is actually stablished by KURDS...

5. MEDEANS and Parthians been the first two tribles that established the state nation of IRAN so You as a KURD supposed to be a son of those MEDIANS, should be at least among the ones who never propose a federalism( I do respect your personal opinion and dotn et me wrong as if I am dictatign you what to do and how to think but liked to clarigy my point of view )

If we get to a SECULAR PARLIMENTARY SYSTEM, WE WILL BE ALL SET AND EVERY BODY WOULD BE SATISFIED... THE MOST ELIGIBLE ONE REGARDLESS OF ITS LOCAL ORIGINATION WOULD BE THE ONE WHO LEAD THE COUNTRY WHERE ALL IRANIANS HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS TO COMPETE TO BE THE LEADER OF THE NATION.

THIS IS WHAT WE NEED...

here I am jamish

I see you dont know who you hate the most?, I make it easy for you 'hate me', after all if somebody with your kind of brain hates me , I must be doing something right.

quote 'let them be mad at us and die of their madness'

I come from southern tehran to be exact charaheh Navab(azerbajan&navab)there is saying between guys, if somebody says quote;you are a traitor!!!the other one replies, check the mirror if you are looking for one. now you are looking for iri agent blogging on her behalf.... here check link below you may find your employer name in there.

www.iht.com/articles/2007/09/22/america/blog.1-138816.php

Responses ...

jamshid:
Hahaha.. Thank you buddy.

Abarmard:
I am ready to fight against US together with Islamic Republic if they attack my country, IRAN. I do not agree with US getting rid of these mullahs. If they rid of them, they will just put in someone even worse to continue keeping Iran weak and puppet.

They will kill our youth. Destroy our historical places. Destroy Iran basically.

Anyway.. Shah.. Shah kept the country stable. He fought and defended our country. He didn't take shit from west. Come on, all you people who go against the Shah.. you can't put up ONE SINGLE EVIDENCE.. but it's ok.. I don't want evidence.. atleast put some examples or dates, or times, or sayings so I can see your point. But I guess you don't have any.

You know.. I hate Shah for one of the things he didn't do.. kill all these bastard mullahs and he should of ordered the military to open fire killing all these bastards revolting against him .. (although, paid by CIA for instance.. Aqvahnnol Moslemin was a group who burnt builidgs, killed people etc.. funded by CIA)

Are you "nokare" Israel?!

I mean tell us the truth.
I am no fan of Mullas. As a matter of fact I think it's high time they leave Iran alone.

But this kind of propaganda specially the first two slides are Israeli propaganda!

Can "Shah"ies, Mullas and Zionist leave
Iranian people alone for a while?!!

We are seek of Dictotarship (shah),
Dogmatism (Mullas) and racist criminals (Zionists)! Can people of Iran live a free life away from foreign interference and domestic despots and Zionist threats for a change?

H'mmmm; I'm thinking: WHo's

H'mmmm; I'm thinking: WHo's more Iranian? Ahmadinejad with balls of steal or coward shah who would bend to big powers. Remember that shah would not be in power even one day without western help. The west had a big Dik behind shah to keep him up and standing.

Analyze that!

Millionaire Mullahs' Service!

Millionaire Mullahs
By Paul Klebnikov, July 2003
(A MUST READ ONE, even though a bit old and done with the data available up to 2003 but still betrays what lies beneath the IR's corrupted system)
www.forbes.com/forbes/2003/0721/056.html

Shah was good for Iran

But he is gone! Now what? Iranians got tricked, no doubt in my mind about it, but I am puzzled to what to do next.

I don't want to go back and build Iran so when it's riped they would change it again.

I don't want a war.

what to do next?

I don't want the US or the rest of the world bully Iran, even with IR being there. I want us to do the job. I want Iran to be a super power and respected.

What to do next? revolt? bomb? wait?

It's not easyt to answer and everone seem to have their own method. So what is next? Based on the history books, I don't have much hope. IR, Shah, Mojahedin are basically it. Which one? none are democratic, progressive enough. None are a true representative of the Iranian society. So what to do next? Mojahedin? Reza Shah? For the short term they might answer our quick desires, but in the long run Iranians want to be the power that they always were. Are we that power? That depends from the angle that you are looking at,

I think the most important thing to do as an Iranian is to have any ideology that you feel and think best fits Iran today, but be smart. Know where we are located, what we have and what games are being played to control our resources. That would be a great boost to our future. I am not sure what else is there to say.

How naive

Really naive. Two ways to think:
1-Iranians revolted themselves: Proves that things weren't the way you say they were. People were done with all the shit.

2-West help bringing khomaini and revolution in: means that they will do it again and won't let Iran succeed. So what's your point here? to go back to the west and ask them to bring Shah back?
What is your point. Just say that so we have a base for an argument? Which argument do you agree with, and how do you see the west leaving us alone to have a good country? wasn't it the west that was frightened of Shah? According to you?
What is the opposition arguments here? I have never got it. I have heard bitching about the problems, but never really and truely seen anyone who is pro Shah or secularism talk about how they are going to overcome the western influence that has cause Iran this great sufferings. Enough is enough, there should be a limit to your none sense. don't be idiots, look to see what we got and where we can go with this. We are a power system that looks towards the region rather than just Iran. Iran is a powerful country. didn't you want that? If we don't have a good economy is not because of IRI, it's because we had wars and continuous sanctions.
Why do you think the western world is against Iran today? Is it possible that Iran has a say?
You don't see it is because you are bunch of illiterate and stupid bunch, those who gave our country to the west many times during our history. Now you are doing it again.
What a shame. Go read and learn, enough is enough. Seriously. get a brain and realize things in a deeper level than what you hear on the western news. For Gods sake, you are living in a democracy, use the resources. Don't be like a Joe eshmo here God damn it.
Iran is reaching the east and creating a new pole for the west. We are something to cope with, not a nobody. Things are on the move. the system is not set to be what it is. Have patience and intelligence. enough is enough. When Shah was good, he was gone. That should tell you something.
We are rich of oil and America won't leave us alone. You think that anyone would give a shit about you? We need to do this by ourselves. How can you be like this? how can you be so stupid? how can you not see that we can't go back. They took it from us, now we can't go to the source that is the cause of our pain and want them to FREE US!!! Are you insane?
Politically backwards, acting like modern men and women you LA crowds are...
Go watch your OPPOSITION TV and continue your none sense and see if we get somewhere.
With all the idiots like you, who needs an enemy.

Re: SarbazIran

Take it easy and clam down! You must be new in this site! With time you will learn that the pro-IRI supporters are many in this site and that they fall in three categories:

1 The "agha zadeh" category (the majority) whose livelihood and comfortable lives (moft khori) depends on the the survival of the IRI. These "bi ghyerats" will defend the IRI more than their own wife or children.

2. The "paid" category (the minority) who are paid directly by IRI's "vezarate etele'aat" to write articles in support of the IRI. The pay is probably not much, but for some it is good a supplement.

3. The "oghdei" category (also a minority) who are still stucked in the ideas and ways of thinking of 1970s.

It is easy to distinguish between them:

The "agha zadeh" category usually are haji bazari types with not much of an education nor upbringing. They are mostly among the "amaleh/akareh/nokar/kolfat" and "bacheh akhoond/bazari" of the 1970s who overnight became influential.

The "paid" types are always registered users and are very intelligent and write very well. They don't cause much damage though as nobody pays attention to their writings. When they do get attention, they usually end up being slammed by others.

The "oghdei" types are driven by pure hate. They are the "smartest" of these cateogires. They do a better job than even the "paid" type. Their strength comes from their hatred which in turn fuels their thinking process which in turn allows them to wirte some of the most deceptive and misleading writings in this site.

However, they all share some attributes:

Unquestionable loyalty to the IRI,

Complete disregard for the well being of Iranians.

Their simple and primitive minds perceive "Iranian" as those who are just like themselves and everyone else as "anti-Iranian", and therefore disposable.

The arrogant and shameless repetition of the 1970 lies.

And lastly their other name is "lie". Lying is deeply ingrained in their ideology which goes back to "taghieh". To them, lying is just part of life, and even a "duty" towards a higher goal. They have mastered the art of lying and use it well. They lie as easily as drinking a glass of water.

So there! I hope this helps you get introduced to the type of IRI supporters you will have to deal with in this site.

SAVAK was evidently

SAVAK was evidently incompetent to allow Khomeini the leader of Islamic fundamentalist lunatic fringe to set foot in Iran. Savak and the Shah failed to educate Iranians about these violent religious fantics. Savak should have gotten a hold of Khomeini's book and should have monitored his subversive activities of Khomeini in Egypt with the Islamic Brotherhood (Khomeini's mentors), Najaf, and Karbabala. Savak and the Shah were inept in defending IRan from her Islamic extremists, period. Shah and SAVAK failed miserbly unlike VEVAK and SAVAMA who spend millions of dollars in Iran and abroad to keep an eye on their opposition. VEVAK and SAVAMA are also made up of most immoral and violent and vile human beings who will have no qualms to torture, rape, maim, and muder and justify their butchery in the name of God! *SPIT*

In Memory of My

In Memory of My Brother

July 27, 2006 marks the 26th anniversary of the passing of my beloved brother Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the late Shahanshah of Iran. As a sister, I miss him for the kind and loving brother he was and for the humanity that defined his person. As an Iranian, I miss him for the promise of progress, development, individual freedom and peace his vision and policy offered our nation—a promise now sadly out of reach. Sister or citizen, the loss grieves me. But grief alone a worthy response to either his memory or the vision or progress he offered for our future.

My brother celebrated life. His nationalism did not confuse the sound and fury of hatred with hard, patient work of gaining the practical capability needed to contend politically, economically, scientifically, and technologically. By the end of his reign, Iran was taking off in every arena of modernization: science, technology, economy, culture, environment, and especially women’s rights. Internationally, Iran was at peace with all countries, east to west and north to south, despite the tensions inherent in a bipolar world.

The Islamism revolution destroyed all this and scared away the valuable human and material assets that had made possible Iran’s progress in so many different fields. Instead, it invited violence and war. To take a true measure of the calamity that befell our nation, we must consider the opportunity cost of the Islamic Republic: What Iran would now be if the revolution had no occurred compared to what it is now. In the last 15 years of my brother’s reign our annual industrial growth exceeded 20 percent, our industrial plants and work force doubled, our GNP increased 13 times from $4 billion to $53 billion, per capita income eight times, passing $2400 in 1978. Today, after 27 years of Islamist rule, our per capita income is less than what it was in 1978. But this is not all.

The Islamists introduced murder as politics by other means. As one of their most notorious judges said, Khomeini, their leader, considered those who had served under the Shah guilty; all that was needed to execute them was to ascertain their identity. This callous disregard of the law was soon extended even to groups that had been instrumental in the Islamist’s victory. As agents of terror and assassination, the Islamists did not discriminate. Even now, they incarcerate and torture innocent people for no reason at all in order to scare others into submission by reminding them of the boundaries they have set beyond which no one may tread.

After 27 years of (mis)rule, the Islamic Republic has now offered Iranians a fanatic named Ahamdinejad as president. This is an affront to our history. Some have suggested the new president appeals to masses. He does not. Nor is baseness to be justified on the pretext that some people at some time may be deceived. Iranians may not always correctly identify the foundations of their own or their nation’s felicity in a complex global world. A leader, however; may not be excused for intellectual vacuity or moral depravity. Ahmadinejad represents a leadership awash in both. The effect is that the regime fails in economic, social and cultural fields. I also routinely places the country and the people in harm’s way, even when it may be in the right otherwise, as when the regime argues that Iranians may master nuclear technology for peaceful use.

Clearly, the future is not reassuring for our people. The regime has placed Iran at odds with the world’s major powers. At the moment, these powers are confused about how to deal with the Islamic Republic. There is talk of accommodating the Islamists. This only whets their appetite. There is talk of bombing Iran. This is wrong not only morally, but also because it will likely strengthen the regime. The truth is that the future Iran, and consequently the prospect of peace in the Middle East, is in the hands of Iranian people. The world must support their right to freedom and dignity. That is the most constructive thing it can do.

The Iranian opposition leaders, however, must do more. They must learn to address the people’s everyday needs, especially the excruciatingly difficult hurdles the young men and women face. Appeals to democracy and human rights must be supported by politics that address the nitty-gritty of the people’s everyday life or they depreciate to bland and insipid slogans. To win, the opposition must give the people options they can relate to, offer alternative policies, tell people clearly why the policies it offers will improve their condition and why the present regime is structurally unable to devise and implement such policies eve if it so desires. More important, the opposition must learn to take risks and tell Iranians honestly that unless they are prepared to take risks, all else will likely prove ineffectual.

That is what my brother would have advised
God bless his soul."

To Anonym

First of all you make it sound like you are more Iranian and I'm. Some of my long distance family fought for Iran so don't accuse me for being a separatist. As Iranian I have the right to express my opinion. if we are going to be unified then we all need to discuss our needs. When I see a secular Iran without being federal, that respects all the Iranians then I have no interest in federalism. Unfortunately we haven’t seen any of that since fall of Achamenid Dynasty. You can accuse me as much as you want, but I'm just expressing my opinion that a lot of Iranians support. Again I'm against separatists and as Iranian Kurd I respect our country's integrity but we have to be realistic.

Anonymouss:

And then people call Shah murderer.. if he truly was a murderer Iran would today be under his control. If SAVAK really was a terrifying secret police, then truly they would be able to control this. If SAVAK was keeping everyone under watch, then.. how the HELL did this revolution happen?

If Shah and SAVAK killed, murdered, tortured people.. then where did all these people come from? If Shah and SAVAK did that, how come people didn't stop? Don't tell me they weren't afraid of dying, almost every human is afraid of dying.

In a book by some american it says that SAVAK had 1 SAVAK agent in every bus station in Tehran.. not to mention that it's not enough for 1 SAVAK agent because you need a few to change shifts, few to write logs, few to take care of information etc etc. For that only it would require 5000 SAVAK agents.. YET.. YET.. the revolution happened.

the Shah ordered the military NOT TO OPEN FIRE and NOT TO KILL ANYONE, yet he is the bad guy.

the Shah left the country peacefully to avoid bloodbath, still he is the bad guy.

the Shah invited Human Right organisations to examine and investigate the countries prisons etc etc.. yet he is the bad guy.

I will repeat this to all anti-Shah people: Grow up. If you are going against His Imperial Majesty then use your brain and come up with something and DISCUSS. Avoid insulting like you all do, insulting gets you insults back. Although you can't discuss with IR-supporters because they can't come up with anything good against His Imperial Majesty Shahanshah.

Persian Gulf:

Iran was NEVER a colony of ANY COUTRY. NEVER. It's a shame that you mention this, perhaps you are not even Iranian trying to make us look bad.

Shah was NOT weak nor a puppet. He stood up, made the oil prices higher, bought arms to protect Iran etc etc and was independant. This is exactly what caused his downfall. USA wanted to have him as a puppet but he refused to.

Bankrupt economy? Fake industry? Primitive agriculture? LOL! You talk as if Iran was some kind of african country. You forgot that Iran was one of the top countries in the world in everything good. Our economy was the greatest so that we could give loans to other countries, we had huge industries and weapon industries that were supposed to start 1980 etc.

Now that I see that you are just a IR-supporting kid who can't debate using logic and all that, instead you bring up the WORST POINTS as desperate action against His Imperial Majesty Shahanshah Aryamehr.

Now go back into your hole.

Anyone that can discuss Iran before and after 1979 using sense, facts, information, without insulting, fighting or anything are feel free to discuss with me.

And no, I don't mean some of the people here who take up the WORST POINTS since they are so desperate! They refuse to think for a second.

When people go against the Shah they bring up Bahrain each time, it proves that they don't have anything else against him so they take the VERY FEW mistakes, problems or bad parts against him (and of course, each one of them can be answered at)

Since I feel sorry for you, about Bahrain. Bahrain was not ours. Bahrain was under British control. We could not afford fighting the British at that time since the Shah was just starting to build the country. It was about Bahrain or Iran, so of course.. he picked Iran. It also made us look good in the international community and not showing us as barbaric people.

If Shahanshah attacked and took Bahrain by force and then the British screwed over Iran, you would go against him .. now that he didn't do that.. you still go against him. Make up your mind idiot.

This only proves that you are a IR-supporter and you know what, you can NEVER make a Shah-supporter to IR-supporter or vica versa in Iranian culture.

Now if you can discuss in a nice and gentle way, I will gladly discuss with you (not you Persian Gulf, you don't know shit).

Iran: After 1979 :Occupied colony of Ommat' alArab

Shah with all his shortcoming was an Iranian citizen.

Not from Najaf,Karbala,Jabal amel, or trained in Arab guerilla camps like the founders of this regime eshghalgareh Arabi.

SarbazIran:

You have failed to mention that before 1979, Iran was a colony of the US, and Shah was a weak servant/puppet of the west. Iran was not under international sanctions but still had a bankrupt economy, a fake industry, and a primitive agriculture thanks to the corruption and incompetence of the Shah's regime. Like today, Iran of pre-1979 had no democracy and no political freedom. Dissidents were treated with an iron fist; Evin was full of political prisoners; the dreadful SAVAK was the center of the shah's power; many intellectuals including college kids were prosecuted, tortured, and executed for their political views.

You forgot to say that Iran lost part of its soil (Bahrain) to Arabs during Shah's reign thanks to his incompetence and dependency to the foreign powers (the British masters dictated the surrender of Bahrain to the Shah - shame on him!). This loss was even more humiliating than the Qajar's shameful treaties with Russians.

In summary, the situation was not much rosier back then than what we have now unlike what you think (or want others to believe). I'm not trying to defend mullahs or justify the present terrible conditions, but won't accept your propaganda (lies) of portraying Iran of pre-1979 as a heaven.

Thanks, but no thanks!

TO DARIUSH(hoder)

LAJANE NEZAME ESTEBDADIYE FASCISTIYE BEH ESTELAH DINIYE IRAN, ANGHADR DAR ZENDEGIYE RUZANEH, ROSHAN VA ASHKAR HAST KEH CHON "GHAZAYAYE PISHINIAN" DAR HENDESEH-RIAZIAT, BARAYE BAVARE AAN NIAZ BEH ESBAT NIST:

ESBATE BIKEFAYATI, SARKUB VA NA-MARDOMIYE IN HUKUMATE GHORUNE VOSTAIYE ZEDDE-MELLI, MESLE LUZUME ESBATE 3-GUSH BUDANE MOSALAS MIBASHAD - HAGHIGHATI ENKARNASHODANI DAR MIANE TUDEYE MARDOME IRAN

WHO needs a geometric proof to accept every TRIANGLE has THREE ANGLES...

nice video

couldn't say it better myself. Thanks for posting it.

Children of khomeini are dying in numbers.

Taa mard sokhan nagofteh baashad,
Eib-o honarash nahofteh baashad.

I am so glad when IRI supporters act, talk, and argue like children. That is more telling of their nature than any counter-argument.

Fortunately, their numbers are diminishing faster than can be replaced with IRI bribery. And the remaining ones will be placed on tight leash by people of iran, specially the youth.

Alas that shah was too soft on those few percent who cared about nothing but their ideology and control of power and wealth. For them, iran and iranians were slaves and second to islam or marx, as we see today. Thee rest were excuses and tools of propaganda.

Stop whining

You ask for evidence? Have you been sleep all these years? Or Are you just born? There has been tons of articles and evidences just on this site. Or the peace of pie doesn't let you accept the truth? Shah was better, IRI is better. They both had and have some good and some bad. What brought shah down was his actions! Stop whining like a baby! Get over it! Pahlavis had their chance and they screwed up. You keep talking about democracy and yet are for Monarchy. That itself is undemocratic. Ruling a nation must be earned not inherited. No wonder you Pahlavi lovers were so weak and literally gave the country away! You sound like the Jews who were following Moses and whining every minute.

فرق دریاچه و

فرق دریاچه و مرداب !

دریاچه ساکتی بود به نام ایران زمین که کسی در
آبهایش به دنبال کشفی نمیرفت زیرا سرکوب سیاسی
بود و همه صغیر فکری
فروغ فرخزاد که خوب شد مرد و این روزها را ندید و یورش
دوباره اسلام متعفن را به خاک ما شاهد نبود

به اشتباه و
کوری تاریخی ما ایرانیان و نشناختن مدرنیزم و هی گه غلت
زدن در اسلام و علم و دانش و مانند قارچ امثال آل الاغ و
دکتر الاغ شریعتی ها همه گه مال به گه اسلام و باقی هم
گه مال به گه لنین و مائو

این دریاچه آرام را (( مرداب ))
مینامید

برای زمان خود حق داشت ولی اکنون اگر زنده بود با تمامی
وجود دنبال همان (( مرداب )) میگشت تا در آن خودش هم
خر غلت بزند والسلام

تصمیم گرفتم استعداد بی نهایت شعری خود را با آوردن شعر
معروف تولدی دیگر او به امروزه روز ....کمی به رختان بکشم

به شاعران حرفه ای بخصوص شبح میگویم که ممکن است که
من شاعر نباشم ولی بار بدن همه جا میبرم قارداش

تهاجمی دیگر

همه هستی من کفر روشنی است
که مرا تکرار کنان
به سحرگاه مانند انسان زندگی کردن
خواهد برد
من برای تو
هم این را آه کشیده ام
آه آه ّاه

زندگی شاید
همان خیابانیست که پاسدار جاکشی جلویت را میگیرد
زندگی شاید همان شلاقی است که با آن کونت را کبود میکنند
زندگی شاید همان عمامه ایست که از آن عقت مینشیند

زندگی شاید رد و بدل کردن پول صیغه ای باشد که در خانه
عفاف گائیده ای
و بینش سیگار هم کشیده ای

!!!!!)

زندگی شاید اون لحظه ترسناکی است که چشم سید علی
چلاق به یک مرد آزاده می افتد و فوری دستش به طرف
بطری کوکا و پپسی میرود !!!!!!

در اتاقی که خیلی هم بزرگ است
من دارم به تو فکر میکنم ( سید علی را میگم )
به مرگت
به تیکه تیکه شدنت
به پودر شدنت
به سوختن
از همه بدتر زنده ماندن و بی تریاک گذاردنت

آه که

سهم تو این است که به دست مردم کشته شوی
سهم تو ریدن به سرت است
سهم تو اردنگی است

در عوض
سهم من گردش در باغ و گلستان واقعی
و ریدن به خاطره ها است !!!!!

از انگشتانم کنار باغچه اسلحه ای مثل صمد
میسازم
و به جنگ سید علی چلاق میرم به به ....به به

گوشواره از گیلاس میخواهم چه کنم خاک بر سر
فوری و فوتی گیلاس ها را میخورم
زیرا در جهان داره قحطی میاد

از تمامی کوچه های بن بست عقم میشنه بوی شاش میدادن
تمامشون بی استثنا

(تمامی کاسب های محل میرفتند
در کوچه های بن بست که رفت و آمد نبود فقط یا رفت بود یا آمد
یه دستی به آب میرساندند ...وقایع نگار از گذشته ها نانا )

کجای شعر بودم خاک برسر ها ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟

آهان

منم یه پری کوچولوئی را میشناختم
که جانیان اسلامی
گرفته و خفه اش کردند
یه پری دیگه ای هم بود
که رفت دم در زندان
ببینه چه خبره
گرفتند یه کمی کشتندش
البته زیر کتک

او از روزی که مرده با هیچ نی لبکی دیگر به دنیا نیامده ولی میل
انتقام مرگ او مانند آتشی در قلب من شاعر میسوزد .......نانازولا

How true

I don't know which to hate more. The IRI leaders in charge, or its traitor supporters prolonging IRI's life and Iran's misery.

TO Kurdish Warrior's SO CALLED Federal IRAN!!!

WE DO NEED A SECULAR SYSTEM BUT NOT A FEDERAL ONE.

IRAN DOES NOT NEED TO GET FEDERALIZED. PLEASE STOP PLOTTING THIS NONSENSE PROPAGANDA.

WE ARE ALL ONE NATION WITH ONE NATIONALITY AS IRANIANS UNDER ONE FLAG AND SHOULD BE UNDER ONE SECULAR TECHNOCRAT GOVERNTMENT.

THERE SHOULDN'T BE SUCH THING AS FEDERAL STATES IN A COUNTRY LIKE IRAN...

IN THE ERA WHEN THE STATE NATIONS ARE GETTING MERGED TO UNIFY THEIR ALL TYPES OF INTERESTS TO OPTIMIZE THEIR PRODUCTIVITY, IRAN AS A KEY COUNTRY WHICH HAS SUSTAINED THIS TERRITORY FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS WOULD NOT NEED GUYS LIKE YOU TO PROPAGATE FEDERALISM FOR US.

BUT THANK YOU!!!

It's lovely how people..

come up with all these lies.

None of them can back them up in any way.. well, if you don't have any good evidence.. atleast some some examples.. atleast give some dates, some time, some names. Nothing! "Shah did this, but sorry.. I have no proof, no examples, nothing.. it's just something I heard from my parents who hate the Shah for not giving them money"

Was he a dictator? Yes. He was a dictator to a LEVEL, and a GOOD DICTATOR who wanted the best for his country. Most of the things were done in a democratical way.. the senate, the majles (parliament), referandums etc etc.

Grow up.

"ISLAMIC REPUBLIC " = "GHAZAYAYE PISHINIAN"

LAJANE NEZAME ESTEBDADE FASCISTIYE BEH ESTELAH DINIYE IRAN, ANGHADR DAR ZENDEGIYE RUZANEH, ROSHAN VA ASHKAR HAST KEH CHON "GHAZAYAYE PISHINIAN" DAR HENDESEH-RIAZIAT, BARAYE BAVARE AAN NIAZ BEH ESBAT NIST:

ESBATE BIKEFAYATI, SARKUB VA NA-MARDOMIYE IN HUKUMATE GHORUNE VOSTAIYE ZEDDE-MELLI, MESLE LUZUME ESBATE 3-GUSH BUDANE MOSALAS MIBASHAD - HAGHIGHATI ENKARNASHODANI DAR MIANE TUDEYE MARDOME IRAN

WHO needs a geometric proof to accept every TRIANGLE has THREE ANGLES?!

بر پايه گزارش روز پنجشنبه سازمان تجارت جهانی، ايران در سال ۲۰۰۷ ميلادی با صدور ۸۳ ميليارد دلار کالای نفتی و غير نفتی، ۰/۸ در صد صادرات جهان را تامين کرده است که همين جايگاه ناچيز هم به برکت افزايش نجومی بهای نفت به دست آمده است.

در همان جدول، وزنه عربستان سعودی در بازرگانی بين المللی ۳/۲ برابر و وزنه امارات متحده عربی ۸/۱ برابر ايران است.

اين گزارش نشان می دهد که صادرات نفتی و غير نفتی ايران کمتر از نصف صادرات مالزی است. ترکيه نيز، بدون قطره ای نفت، ۲۴ ميليارد دلار بيش از کل صادرات نفتی و غير نفتی ايران، به دنيا کالا می فروشد.

اين گزارش نشان می دهد که صادرات نفتی و غير نفتی ايران کمتر از نصف صادرات مالزی است. ترکيه نيز، بدون قطره ای نفت، ۲۴ ميليارد دلار بيش از کل صادرات نفتی و غير نفتی ايران، به دنيا کالا می فروشد.

گزارش سالانه سازمان تجارت جهانی می گويد ايران در سال ۲۰۰۷ ميلادی با ۴۵ ميليارد دلار واردات، ۴/۰ درصد بازارهای وارداتی جهان را در اختيار داشته است.

ايران عضو سازمان تجارت جهانی نيست و فرآيند الحاقش به اين سازمان عملا به حالت تعليق در آمده است.

بيست و ششم ماه مه سال ۲۰۰۵ ميلادی، پس از بيست و يک بار تلاش نافرجام از سوی جمهوری اسلامی، شورای عمومی سازمان تجارت جهانی سر انجام با تشکيل «گروه کاری الحاق» برای بررسی تقاضای عضويت تهران موافقت کرد و از همان روز نام ايران در فهرست اعضای ناظر اين سازمان قرار گرفت.

سخن بر سر کشور هايی است که عضويتشان مورد بررسی است و اگر مذاکرات در مورد آنها به خوبی و خوشی بگذرد، پس از پشت سر گذاشتن دورانی نسبتا طولانی – معمولا هشت تا ده سال- به عنوان عضو تمام و کمال وارد سازمان می شوند.

با آغاز دوران زمامداری محمود احمدی نژاد، فرآيند الحاق ايران به سازمان تجارت جهانی در نخستين گام های خود متوقف شد.

با توجه به روابط بسيار تيره جمهوری اسلامی با بخش بزرگی از قدرت های بزرگ اقتصادی، بعيد به نظر می رسد گفت وگو بر سر الحاق ايران به سازمان تجارت بين المللی در آينده نزديک از سر گرفته شود.

در مقابل، هر شش کشور عضو «شورای همکاری خليج فارس»، به سازمان تجارت جهانی راه يافته اند و در ميان ديگر همسايگان ايران، ترکيه و پاکستان و ارمنستان نيز عضو اين سازمانند.