Focus Visually On Iran

Anglophile, my old chap - here is an easy pol-sci 101 quiz

I will even give you the answers underneath each question, if you promise not to peek.

Q. who is ruling Iran now?

A. Blood-sucking Mollahs.

Q. Why are the Mollahs ruling Iran?

A. Because Iranians were yearning for democracy under MRP.

Q. What is RP(II) doing now?

A. He is promising Iranians to do what his father, MRP, should have done 60 years ago, if Iranians gave monarchy a chance, again.

Chill off MM - you need to retake your 101s :))

sorry buddy - Shah should have ruled than decreed

If the 1906 constitution was based on the European monarchies, even your current Queen in England would say that it was a dicatorship.  Your Queen learned that lesson when Washingtonophiles kicked the old Georgiboy out of the new world for taxation without representation.

The actions you mentioned were based on a collective of thoughts from inside of Iran to change monarchy for the better.  On the other hand, if the Shah would have listened to his heart rather than foreign agents, his son would be ruling Iran rather than these blood-sucking Mollahs.

Is this supposed to be a rebuttal?

• He started off when he meddled in the legislaative affairs to get the Razmara's assassin off the hook as token of his appreciation for the vital assistance he received from Kashani and Co in having an obstacle called Razamara cleared off.
•  
• He he unlawfully brought the Majles to a state of dissolution by getting his supporters in Majles to resign. The he unlawfully staged an illegal and uncostitutonal referundum to legitimise the dissolution.
•  
• He did not protect the institution of monarchy against the unconstitutional speeches, provocations and actions of his own cabinet members, e.g. Fatemi and Shayegan among others.
•  
• He disobeyed the Shah's decree that  removed him from office (received on 25 Mordad), He kept that decree secret from his own cabinet members until after he was removed.

regarding this video, and Anglophile's question

This video sounds like the type of weekly half-truths that another not-so-well-known Iranian puts together, and adds his own version of truth in between the sentences. 

Personally, I do not think that joining the Mason's lodge is a crime, and as a matter of fact, some Masons that I know here are very horoable folks.  The main question that needs to be answered is whether an Iranian like Mosaddegh (Mason or not) disregarded/betrayed his oath of office.  And, compare that to the other not so honorable Iranian Masons from, e.g., All-Iranian's blog (//iranian.com/main/blog/all-iranians-58).

تهمت فراماسون بودن دکتر مصدق

for a rebuttal, see //naghddrmosadegh.blogfa.com/post-16.aspx

اگه فراماسونری بده پس چرا مصدق فراماسون شد؟