ونداد زمانی

The facts of Islam

A scientific fact: the Prophet Mohammed was nothing but a delusional fantasist with delusions of grandeur. He was an epileptic and had mental problems. Furthermore, he was a mass murderer whose preferred method of execution was decapitation before enslaving the women and children of those he assailed. He was also a thief that raded caravans and stole their loot. To top it off the prophet Mohammed was a paedophile who had sexual intercourse with a nine year old and the ripe old age of 55. What makes it worse it was the daughter of one of his ardent followers. Islamic has to be one of the most evil phenomena in last two thousand years and its evil yoke has destroyed our beloved Iran. There is a scientific fact for you. 

A fifth grade science question...

Actually your question is more scientific than what this Dr. Nelson in claiming here.

Having said that, I don't fully understand your question. It sounds very hypothetical. I think if, and that is a big if, science proved the existence of God, it would follow that that science would also prove which religion is right or wrong and to what degree, etc. 

But I find it a better approach to break down the concept of God into smaller parts. For example: creator of physical universe or parts of it; fully or partially responsible and in charge of what happens in this world, and similar smaller parts. Then it becomes easier and more meaningful to try to understand.

For example, you can decided whether there is some sort of intelligence behind the creation of this universe or not. That does not put you into any religion. It does not explain who that creator is or what he may be like. It simply discusses whether there is some sort of intelligence behind it or is it a dumb thing.

One thing you can get out of it for example, is that if it is a dumb thing then you and I discussing it loses all its meaning. It is like saying you and I are two bricks discussing this. Then we have to wonder if bricks are aware of anything. We really can't say it is a dumb thing because then the person saying that cannot defend himself as to why he is here discussing it. Why should it matter? If we are not aware and we are no different than a dumb object then we are not actually here understanding anything - it is all an illusion to a brick that is us! You can't even really finish such a thought - it is that stupid. So I think those who are "materialist" have already defeated themselves!

But that does NOT mean that any religion out there is necessarily correct on everything they say. Maybe some of what they say in some way has some truth in it. After all, there must be a reason why so many people seek religious beliefs. It is not all because we are uneducated and un-scientific, as Dr. Nelson here would want us to believe. Only a very uneducated person with very superficial understanding of his surrounding could say such a thing. Also keep in mind that materialism promises to some the possibility of making slaves. Although slaves have been made through fake religions too, but materialism is probably the ultimate in slavery where people accept and surrender to the falsehood that they are just objects and therefore nothing means anything anyway. If person A turns the body of person B into pulp, why should that be right or wrong? It is just matter changing shape. Who is to say one shape or form is better or worse than the other. But such materialists sometimes then come back and say, "Well, it is wrong because person B would feel pain." but that doesn't make sense because matter does not sense anything. The whole point of materialism is that there is nothing truly conscious. It is really just a "hat trick" otherwise materialism is dead right at the start, before it even finishes a sentence!

ونداد عزیز

A fifth grade science question...

This is my question: "Would a scientific proof of God's existence, necessarily prove the divine nature of any religion?"

I know it's an off-topic question, but that's the way my brain works even outside of the tunnel! 

Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.

مهدی جان

ونداد عزیز

بنده کجا از یقین و ایمان صحبت کردم؟ اینجانب کشفیات علمی را که ظاهراّ این آقای نلسون بی شعور ازش بی خبره مطره کردم بابا.

حالا به فارسی

من شوخی نمی کردم. از خودم هم در نیاوردم. بیشتر از ۹۹ درصد اتم از فضای خالی تشکیل شده. این دو ویدئو که متاّسفانه به انگلیسی است توضیح می دهند.

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypne21A0R4 

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=45KGS1Ro-sc&feature=related 

Sorry for multiple posts in a row - I am just excited

This is the quantum part I was talking about: 

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=45KGS1Ro-sc&feature=related

Vandad

MM Brought up a very good, important and valid point and you just brushed it off and gave an answer that is not answer - with all due respect. How can a person hearing precise, exact words, action and even his own body from a distant location while unconscious, have those words, images and actions in his "contemporary" archive? Can you explain please?

Also - I am not here talking about religious superstitious and mumbo-jumbo. But I am also not willing to accept "scientific" mumbo-jumbo. And so far what this "respected" guy is saying is scientific nonsense - no disrespect to you. 

Non-believers pay attention

An atom is more than 99% empty space, and the protons and neutrons make up a very small amount of the volume of an atom.

This is a SCIENTIFIC FACT observed under electronic microscope. Just Google it. You will find more than enough scientific sites and scientists telling you. If you can afford an electronic microscope or use someone's you can see it for yourself - you don't need to rely on some "respected" moron.

Joking aside, for those who actually have a scientific inclination and not hocus-pocus, this is a real and serious.

Short of having access to an electronic microscope (if you don't trust any scientific institution) I can only find you more authority by simply Googling the phrase "100% empty space" or something similar.

You trust YouTube as a very reliable scientific source, right? (this was a joke) Here it is - this video explains it very well (forgot how to embed it here - sorry):

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypne21A0R4

hey mehdi

I bet that's your Friday Prayer topic. At least you apparently read and write persian.

Are you people for real?

____________

IRAN FIRST

____________

مهدی عزیز

قرن هاست که دلائل به یقین و ایمان تکیه داده شده در تبیین جهانی که ما می شناسیم نقش داشتند، بد نیست نمونه های از تلاش انسانی و به دور از ایمان و اعتقاد نیز فرصت تبیین و توجیه پدیده ها را داشته باشند. جای نگرانی برای شما نباید باشد وقتی که یقین دارید به تفسیر قطعی و ازلی!

Thanks Mehdi, that was very educational

I didn't know that real scientist have proved that 99% of the world does not exist. I hope there were at least 100 of them or with that theory there would be less than 1 real scientist with such proofs.

Dear MM

Dr Nelson briefly menioned the fact that we know  and we saw many aspects of what we racall during Near Death expreience including the images of operations in hospitals. In fact there are many movies and TV shows that remade those kind of scenes in the fictional  locations. Therefore seeing those images is part of contemperoary archive in people's mind...

مادی گراها و علم دروغیشان

I saw the program. Nice translation.

Most of the technical explanations make sense.  However, one thing that you did not go into much is regarding the out of body experience.  This is, e.g., where the patient on an operating table with eyes shut, under anesthetics and a curtain between the operating area would recall what was said, what the surgeon's shoes looked like or describe the operation in laymen terms!!!!

Dear Monda

I'm glad that you found it intresting

Cheers

vandad

Very Interesting information

Thanks for sharing Vandad, in Persian, what I once experienced. Now I have some familiar words to connect to that experience of mine.