مناظره سید ابوالحسن بنی صدر از اعضای شورای انقلاب و اولین رئیس جمهور منتخب ایران با بابک زهرائی از اعضای حزب کارگران سوسیالیست ایران که حزبی تروتسکیستی در ایران بود و راه و روش مائوئیست ها را در ایران دنبال میکرد.این مناظره پیرامون مسائل اقتصادی در سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران انجام شد/سال ۱۳۵۸ .
Recently by Tapesh | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
A Conversation between a Bahai and a former member of Hojjatieh Association | 2 | Dec 04, 2012 |
ماهیت اوباش و لاتهای ۲۸ مرداد ۳۲ - علی امینی | 7 | Dec 01, 2012 |
رضا شاه چگونه مردم را فریب میداد ؟ | 3 | Nov 29, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
.............
by maziar 58 on Sat Mar 17, 2012 08:52 PM PDThelp .
no audio here.
Maziar
Happy Noruz Siamak Jaan. I do agree with you! But, the
by Oon Yaroo on Sat Mar 17, 2012 08:20 AM PDTuniversal rule of the chicken or egg being first also applies to the Iranians in their being "prepared" to handle "freedom" versus being "free" to be able to be "prepared!! Too many passive voices here! :-)))
But I do agree that, we have to start somewhere.
BTW, last night, when I looked at myself in the mirror I realized I have seen this guy somewhere before.
It was only a few minutes later when I saw your handsome photo in IC, when I was convinced that I am indeed you or better yet you are indeed me!
Noruz Shoma Shad.
OY,if your beloved shah had allowed for simple political debate
by Siamak Asadian on Fri Mar 16, 2012 08:09 PM PDTwithin Iran, (instead of starting a single-party state "Hezb Rastakhiz") and Iranian people like every other civilized nation were able to hear these idiots through a healthy open process then it would not have led to here.
But that was not the case, and here we are.
Why simple historical facts are so hard to accept for you monarchists?
And a happy Noroz to you.
P.S. BTW aren't you suppose to be me, and I'm suppose to be you?!?!?
Siamak Jaan, What happened to Babok Zahraie?
by Oon Yaroo on Fri Mar 16, 2012 04:29 PM PDTNo wonder Iran is so vayron now!
When you have a Gaav on the left and a Goosfand on the right moderated by a Khar in between, we have the situation at our hand today (e.g., IRR)!?
حزبی تروتسکیستی در ایران بود و روش مائوئیست ها را دنبال میکرد?!؟
Siamak AsadianFri Mar 16, 2012 04:13 PM PDT
Tapesh jaan, your brief description makes no sense.
"Trotskyists" were all about organizing Industrial workers in the industrial centers of cities.
"Maoists" were all about organizing peasants and farm-workers in the countryside.
The Iranian SWP itself (belive it or not) had three different factions.
Ali P. is justified in his confusion. All these sectarian debates were worthless and confusing to begin with. When one only sees a portion of the entire debate, it just gets more confusing and WORTHLESS. Cheers
???
by Ali P. on Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:55 AM PDTWhat the hell were they talking about???
It doesn't make any sense today.
Did it back then?