سال ۱۳۵۸ - مناظره سید ابوالحسن بنی صدر و بابک زهرائی

Tapesh
by Tapesh
16-Mar-2012
 

مناظره سید ابوالحسن بنی صدر از اعضای شورای انقلاب و اولین رئیس جمهور منتخب ایران با بابک زهرائی از اعضای حزب کارگران سوسیالیست ایران که حزبی تروتسکیستی در ایران بود و راه و روش مائوئیست ها را در ایران دنبال میکرد.این مناظره پیرامون مسائل اقتصادی در سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران انجام شد/سال ۱۳۵۸ .

 


Share/Save/Bookmark

more from Tapesh
 
maziar 58

.............

by maziar 58 on

help .

no audio here.

Maziar


Oon Yaroo

Happy Noruz Siamak Jaan. I do agree with you! But, the

by Oon Yaroo on

universal rule of the chicken or egg being first also applies to the Iranians in their being "prepared" to handle "freedom" versus being "free" to be able to be "prepared!! Too many passive voices here! :-)))

But I do agree that, we have to start somewhere.

BTW, last night, when I looked at myself in the mirror I realized I have seen this guy somewhere before.

It was only a few minutes later when I saw your handsome photo in IC, when I was convinced that I am indeed you or better yet you are indeed me!

Noruz Shoma Shad.


Siamak Asadian

OY,if your beloved shah had allowed for simple political debate

by Siamak Asadian on

within Iran, (instead of starting a single-party state "Hezb Rastakhiz") and Iranian people like every other civilized nation were able to hear these idiots through a healthy open process then it would not have led to here.

But that was not the case, and here we are.

Why simple historical facts are so hard to accept for you monarchists?

And a happy Noroz to you.

P.S. BTW aren't you suppose to be me, and I'm suppose to be you?!?!?


Oon Yaroo

Siamak Jaan, What happened to Babok Zahraie?

by Oon Yaroo on

No wonder Iran is so vayron now!

When you have a Gaav on the left and a Goosfand on the right moderated by a Khar in between, we have the situation at our hand today (e.g., IRR)!?


Siamak Asadian

حزبی تروتسکیستی در ایران بود و روش مائوئیست ها را دنبال میکرد?!؟

Siamak Asadian


Tapesh jaan, your brief description makes no sense.

"Trotskyists" were all about organizing Industrial workers in the industrial centers of cities.

"Maoists" were all about organizing peasants and farm-workers in the countryside.

The Iranian SWP itself (belive it or not) had three different factions.

Ali P. is justified in his confusion. All these sectarian debates were worthless and confusing to begin with. When one only sees a portion of the entire debate, it just gets more confusing and WORTHLESS. Cheers 


Ali P.

???

by Ali P. on

What the hell were they talking about???

It doesn't make any sense today.

Did it back then?