محمد رضا پهلوی برخلاف پدرش فردی عیاش بود

Tapesh
by Tapesh
07-Sep-2012
 

رضا شاه پهلوی پسرش محمد رضا را برای ادامه سلطنت آماده می ساخت

محمد رضا پهلوی بر خلاف پدرش فردی عیاش بود و اقتدار خاصی هم در اداره حکومت نداشت.


Share/Save/Bookmark

more from Tapesh
 
omeedvar

These are facts

by omeedvar on

The father and son, both loved Iran, and history will show what a great job they did for Iran.

Both were forced to leave Iran. Reza shah was exiled to South Africa during WW2, after about fifteen years as shah. His son brought back from Switzerland, at the age of 19, when he was a student. He may have made some mistakes at young age, as did prince Harry of England and President Clinton. However, he never had haramsara, and was  mono-gomus.

I think they were forced to leave the country, because they were doing good for Iran. People who trash Pahlavies at this time, are the ones who try to take the attension away from the tyranny of the current regime in Iran.

 


MRX

what is wrong with that

by MRX on

who cares if he was? at the end of the day he was a patriot. by all accounts he worked 12 to 16 hiours a day (work not smoking opium!) to build a better Iran. is it me or islamo communists are pretty much out of  ideas and best they can do is to constantly pick on the dead shah and blog in here about him. When will see a blog about how many times a day  shah farted ?


Rebecca

Who Cares?

by Rebecca on

Who cares if Shah was "ayash". The important thing was that he loved Iran much more than these brutal mollahs.

We overthrew him and he is gone (RIP). Let's concentrate on current miserable situation in Iran. Mollahs are even more "ayash."


First Amendment

.

by First Amendment on

No one can deny the fact that Iran has always been the land of "good dead kings"......