Hillary Clinton’s surprise win against all odds and all poll data is raising some questions. The peculiar part is the polls were correct on pretty much all data except Hilary’s.
What’s most alarming is the discrepancy in results between locations that used an electronic scanning machine (that’s has shown to be easily hacked) vs. hand counting. The counted ballots, Obama won over Clinton, and where optical scanners were used Clinton won.
I am not trying to be alarmist or conspiratorial but,
it’s awfully strange when there is a reversal of voting pattern between (machines that can be hacked) vs. hand counted ballots.
The data analysis is available here: http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php?party=DEMOCRATS
This is an actual hack on an official ballot that took less than 5 min,:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-353592780…
There are some fixes to reduce the vulnerability of these machines but as I understand NH machines had not been fixed.
Deja vu anyone?
