It is interesting to see that the mouthpieces of Western neo-colonial powers talk from both sides of their mouths. On one hand, they call such medieval regimes in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Jordan and Egypt moderate states and on the other hand, when there is an international outcry on abuses, they shed crocodile tears on lack of basic human rights in these satellite states. These regimes are the creation of the Western powers.
If the West hadn’t brought to life such bloodsuckers and was not arming them to their teeth with the most sophisticated arms and was not training their secret service with the latest techniques of torture, would there be a Saudi regime? You think the Saudi masses and the intellectuals are incapable of grasping modern and liberating views and do not wish to free their society from the tentacles of these sheiks, the Western lackeys and the medieval parasites.
You think the democratic Saudi groups do not wish to free their people from stone age conditions. (At least in the stone age, the women were highly regarded and were not treated like animals.)
Throughout years, the West has been the main defender and the backbone of the clergy and the sheiks in these societies. They are the ones who created the Taliban and the Saudis. They have nothing against Taliban/Saudi views but rather against those who are not in compliance. In Iran, they (headed by the English and Tsarist forces) allied with the clergy (Mashru-e Khahan) and the dictatorial lackeys against the Constitutionalists (Mashrute Khahan) in the 1906 democratic revolution and bombed the parliament.
They allied with the clergy headed by Ayatollah Kashani in 1953 against the democratic government of Dr. Mossadegh and overthrew his democratically elected government. (Kermit Roosevelt, one of the engineers of the 1953 coup, writes in his diary that they spread rumors that Mossadegh was a communist when they were passing out dollars bills to street gangs and hoodlums to chant “Down with Mossagegh”.)
