In the aftermath of the show president of IRR, the Islamist Rapist Republic’s bald-faced lies he told–among others about 9/11 mass murders, Holocaust and stoning–during his annual trip to UN, some interesting development have taken place.
Aside the public outing of the Islamist Rapists’ friends in America, some of its other known partisans have had to try to cover their tracks.
One, Hooman Majd who is described in his published articles as “an adviser and translator for two Iranian presidents, Mohammad Khatami and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, on their trips to the U.S. and the U.N.” has had to write a scathing article condemning his presumably now former employer’s antics in NY.
Another, Stephen Kinzer, a favorite of the NIAC lobby and a proponent of making nice with IRR, who was a dinner guest of the show president in NY, has also somewhat rebuked his dinner host.
There are others in the same league as well like the IRR’s nuke lobbyist who in a longish write up enumerated the lies told by the show president.
My question is:
How these chaps and their likeminded could on the one hand call the show president a liar and on the other hand believe what the same “liar” says about the “peaceful intent” of the vast and illegal nuke program?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-09-23/my-dinner-with-irans-mahmoud-ahmadinejad/
