The US has already increased its military presence in the region amid growing tensions with Iran, sending an aircraft carrier strike group to the Persian Gulf. However, a recent New York Times report suggested that the military presence could expand to the level at the time of the Iraq invasion.
US President Donald Trump slammed the report about a possible deployment of 120,000 troops to the Middle East in order to counter Iran as “fake news” and expressed hope that such a plan won’t be needed. At the same time, he said that he would “absolutely” send 120,000 troops more to the Middle East, or even more, if necessary.
“Would I do that? Absolutely. But we have not planned for that. Hopefully we’re not going to have to plan for that. And if we did that, we’d send a hell of a lot more troops than that”, Trump said.
Earlier the same day, Iranian envoy to the UN Majid Takht Ravanchi accused the US of waging “psychological warfare” against Tehran, while commenting to CNN on a recent report that the Pentagon had allegedly presented a plan to deploy 120,000 additional troops to the Middle East if Iran decides to develop nuclear weapons.
Ravanchi pointed out that Iran was not interested in creating tensions in the region, unlike certain other countries.
“We are not in the business of trying to create conflict in our neighbourhood, because nobody is going to have benefit from such a conflict in our region except for a few […]some people in Washington and some countries in our neighbourhood”, he said.
The Iranian ambassador said he failed to comprehend the threats issued earlier by US President Trump, who claimed that it would be “a very bad mistake” if Iran “do[es] anything” to US forces stationed in the region. Ravanchi stressed that it was the Americans who were deployed in “the Persian Gulf area”, far away from their homeland, while Iran has never approached US borders with weapons.
The UN envoy further argued that Washington’s current approach to communicating with Iran would bear no fruit and would not result in any change to its policies.
“The policy of maximum pressure and the offer of a dialogue are mutually exclusive. They cannot expect Iran to accept an offer under pressure. […] We cannot accept a dialogue based on coercion, based on intimidation and threats”, Ravanchi said.
