As Trump administration officials rushed to blame Iran for the reported attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman on Thursday, the timing and apparent target of the explosions immediately prompted warnings that they may have been part of a deliberate effort to provoke a war between the U.S. and Iran.
“The fact that the sabotage occurred amid Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s state visit to Iran underscores that the likely motive of the attackers is to prevent any easing of tensions.”
—Jamal Abdi, National Iranian American Council
The alleged attacks, which set a Japanese-owned tanker ablaze, came as Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe met with Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in an attempt to reduce dangerous military tensions between the Iran and the U.S.
Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), said in a statement that Thursday’s attacks could have been carried out by “actors in the region and beyond who want to maneuver the U.S. into a war.”
“With [national security adviser] John Bolton seeking to maneuver the U.S. into a war with Iran,” said Abdi, “the sabotage of more oil tankers underscores the increasingly dangerous situation in the Middle East as the Trump administration pursues its maximum pressure approach toward Iran.”
“The fact that the sabotage occurred amid Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s state visit to Iran—where he is believed to have communicated a message from Trump to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei—underscores that the likely motive of the attackers is to prevent any easing of tensions,” Abdi added. “For Congress, these attacks are yet another warning sign that Trump and his team are leaning into a disastrous war in the Middle East.”
On Twitter, NIAC founder Trita Parsi echoed Abdi’s concerns about the timing of the incident in the Gulf of Oman.
“Sounds like some are afraid Japan may succeed in starting diplomacy,” Parsi said. “The message appears to be: Don’t you dare stand in the way of my war plans.”
While the Trump White House has not yet publicly assigned blame for the alleged attacks, one anonymous Defense Department official toldCBS News—without citing any evidence—that it is “highly likely Iran caused these attacks.”
According to the Washington Post, “U.S. military officials have assessed that the attacks were carried out by Iran or forces under its influence.” The officials have not provided any proof to support their claim.
“Whoever is behind the attacks is no friend of Iran.”
—Julian Lee, Bloomberg
The effort to blame Iran for the tanker attacks on Thursday is reminiscent of the unsubstantiated accusations in May from Bolton and the U.S. intelligence community that Iran was behind separate attacks on Saudi and UAE vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
As the New York Timesreported, it continues to be unclear who was behind last month’s tanker attacks, despite Bolton’s assertion at the time that Iran was “almost certainly” responsible.
Following Thursday’s alleged attacks, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said “suspicious doesn’t begin to describe what likely transpired this morning” and expressed the urgent need for diplomacy.
Another Iranian official told BBC Newsthat Iran “had nothing to do with today’s apparent attacks” and said “someone is trying to destabilize relations between Iran and the [international] community.
#Iran official tells me it had nothing to do with today’s apparent attacks on oil tankers in #Gulf of #Oman. Says someone is trying to destabilise relations between Iran and the Intl community.
According to Iran’s Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), an Iranian rescue vessel picked up 44 sailors and brought them to safety following the tanker explosions.
It is unclear how much damage was done to the tankers or whether anyone was harmed by the reported attacks.
In a column on Thursday, Bloomberg oil strategist Julian Lee argued that while Iran would have “little to gain” from attacking tankers in the Gulf of Oman, it will likely “still get the blame—and suffer the fallout.”
The “group that will benefit from the incident,” Lee wrote, is “the people who want to see the U.S. step up its campaign against Iran and move from an economic war to a military one.”
“There are plenty of those, both in the U.S. and among its allies in the Persian Gulf and wider Middle East regions,” Lee added.
The alleged attacks, Lee concluded, are “absolutely understandable if you’re someone whose ultimate goal is to derail any easing of tensions between the two nations, and to effect regime change in Tehran. Whoever is behind the attacks is no friend of Iran.”