VIOLENCE

that is why

the Iranians should arm themselves to the teeth to destroy all British interest in Iran. Destroy their embassy, expel their diplomats and ban entry of any British to Iran. If we close their embassy for 30 years we can see a modest progress in our society, short of that you will end up dealing with what you are going through now.

Vote for closing the British embassy as soon as possible.

Great piece

This is a thought-provoking and logical piece. The West has been playing this game of double-standard since the beginning of the Imperial Age. The same is true for the West's insistence on nuclear non-proliferation, while at the same time U.S., Britain, and France stock up on atom bombs. What hypocrisy! One more thing: why do people who can't understand Persian (or English) feel the need to post a comment everywhere on this site and make a fool of themselves?

Read Joseph Massad's article

It's an excellent piece and very thought provoking.

Oh God hoder...

I am sorry, but you got my time and I read what you had written Mr Hossein. God... you'd be okay and acceptable to me if your name was a Jewish-Christian one from America, Britain or whatever, but no, that's not the case. You're sitting in the comfort the same West you're lamenting about has provided you with, and you're defending a regime and it's so-called 'rights' who is abusing and mistreating your countrymen in a country you have left. Hoder, this reality destroys any argument you may ever bring toward defending the IRI. Go back to the IRI, then defend them! Okay, I'd say then that you are a principled man! But, you are nothing but an obnoxious Iranian... let's say, parasite, to be nice! Mr Hossein, the Iranian regime first needs to respect its own people and let them choose their leaders freely, then accuse America, Europe or Israel, who are democratic countries, regions, regime etc! None of them (US, EU etc) are perfect, but they are far more humane than the IRI or Hamas, Hezbollah, Assad regime, Saudi regime etc who are trampling the Islamic world with no mercy.

What's the point?

What is this, an intro to a sociology course? Wouldn't it be better if Hoder took the time and presented an argument rather than refer to half dozen other writers? Where is the value in this post?

The real advocate

The real advocate of non violence are islamo facists! why, because they know as long as you act non violnet you will never get any where and they for be sure be nasty and violent to you!
Of course the writer and his ilks always, always, will bring, jews and isreal in everything. I wonder if one day if Isreal will sease to exist what will they use then?

Perhaps a good suggestion

To use violence against arab invadors of Iran or in other words the fanatic islamists who take Iran's naturanl resources and pass it on to thier kin in Lebanon, or to Hamas, etc.

Islam is based on violence, one can not expect anything more from its followers.

Justifying the unjustifiable

The second generation rabid Islamist says

هروقت آمریکا و اسراییل و اروپایی‌ها، یعنی استعمار قدیم و تازه، بمب‌های اتمی‌شان را نابود کردند و پایگاه‌های نظامی‌شان را از کشورهای دیگر جمع کردند و بودجه‌‌های ارتش‌شان را به اندازه‌ی بودجه‌ی بهداشت و تامین اجتماعی‌شان رساندند، ما هم عدم خشونت را قبول می‌کنیم.

Aside from the lame excuse justifying Islamists’ homicidal violence mostly against the innocent Moslems and advocating their favorite wished for scenario, Nuke armed Islamist republic--in referring to his likeminded violence-prone Islamists the extremist Islamist uses the plural pronoun “we”.  As “we” he is answerable to all that is being done by his likeminded Islamists in the Islamist republic and beyond 

His Farsi is confusing

He cannot wrtie properly. Isrealis and Americans come from India (Hend)????????????

I am confused...

Who is advocating non-violence?

Americans and Israelis advocate non-violence resistance? When? Where? Against whom?

 What are you talking about?