We have a lot of Khomeini's! But where are 'our' Newton's and Voltaire's?

Share/Save/Bookmark

We have a lot of Khomeini's! But where are 'our' Newton's and Voltaire's?
by Iqbal Latif
10-Oct-2012
 

This world of ours is going through 'a war of ideas,' the war between the "defenders of Gods" and the "defenders of reason" i.e. predestination (jabr) and free will (ikhtiyar). We have lot of icons of 'jabr' like Mawdudi's/Khomeini's /Qutub's! But where are our icons of 'ikhtiyar' Locke's, Newton's and Voltaire's? If freewill has to survive the hypocrisies of the 'icons of the predestination (jabr)' will have to be exposed to the rank and file. No words need to be reserved. Religious dogma and apparatus of state when they combine together, the populace cannot survive the brunt.

When a society demands a transformation they should chuck their archaic pious impracticality; look into the mirror and try to find where are their Spinoza's, Locke's, Newton's and Voltaire's? Culture that spews terrorists and misfits is also a society that promotes fanatical bigoted attitudes as a ingredient of the ideological menu proscribed by the unquestionable divine clout of clergy.

For a society to develop; the prevalent religious inclinations and thought needs to be subject to human reason. Places where religious thought reign supreme will always remain debauched and hesitant infested with internecine wars and disasters. Terrorism is a state of mind, it is reflection of inflexible ideological absolutist will and puritanical romanticism that becomes a part of a nation cerebral curriculum instead of broad-mindedness, forbearance, rationalism and reason.

Enlightened minds will challenge narrow-mindedness bigotry and fanaticism. Any change should be sparked by the two lines of thought that buttress 'Age of Enlightenment' or 'Age of Reason' termed initially as the radical enlightenment, inspired by philosophy of Spinoza, "Democracy; racial and sexual equality; individual liberty of lifestyle; full freedom of thought, expression, and the press; eradication of religious authority from the legislative process and education; and full separation of church and state". Secondly the moderate enlightenment, which in a number of different philosophical systems, in the writings of Descartes, John Locke, Isaac Newton or Christian Wolff, who expressed and sought reform and accommodation with the old systems of power and faith .

The cornerstone of the 'Age of Enlightenment' or 'Age of Reason' was a civilizing progress of intellectuals in 18th century Europe and the United States, the aim was to restructuring of society and knowledge, in Age of Reason religion was subject to human reason, and not a source of knowledge. It promoted science and rational substitution and opposed superstition, intolerance and abuses by church and state. Enlightenment culminated in the great Encyclopédie (1751–72) edited by Denis Diderot (1713–1784) with contributions by hundreds of leading philosophers(intellectuals) such as Voltaire (1694–1778), Rousseau (1712–1778) and Montesquieu (1689–1755). Historian Robert Darnton argued that the categorization of religion was subject to human reason, and not a source of knowledge. Theology therefore was ordered under 'Philosophy' 'Knowledge of God' was placed only a few nodes away from 'Divination' and 'Black Magic'.

The tree of Diderot and d'Alembert, is the source of the "figurative system of human knowledge." Encyclopédie attempted to bring together all the information sprinkled on the surface of the globe.The goal of our living is that the works of past is does not remain unproductive for the centuries that follow, our descendants by becoming more learned, may become more virtuous and happier, that we do not die without having merited being part of the human race. The tree was a taxonomy of human knowledge, inspired by Francis Bacon's The Advancement of Learning the three main branches of knowledge in the tree are: "Memory"/History, "Reason"/Philosophy, and "Imagination"/Poetry.

Enlightenment origins are traced to Descartes' Discourse on Method, published in 1637. Others define Enlightenment with the publication of Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica in 1687. Jonathan Israel makes the detailed case that, from 1650 to 1750, Spinoza was "the chief challenger of the fundamentals of revealed religion, received ideas, tradition, morality, and what was everywhere regarded, in absolutist and non-absolutist states alike, as divinely constituted political authority."

We look for change, a great change does not appear in emptiness; it were the political ideals of the Enlightenment that influenced the American Declaration of Independence, the United States Bill of Rights, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. It was sparked by philosophers Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677), John Locke (1632–1704), physicist Isaac Newton (1643–1727), and philosopher Voltaire (1694–1778) originating about 1650 to 1700. When a culture demands a change they should look into the mirror and try to find where are their Spinoza's, Locke's, Newton's and Voltaire's? A civilisation that considers Syed Mawdudi/ Syed Khomieni /Syed Qutub as their Spinoza's and their mainstay philosophies, there is no chance in hell of any illumination? Dark ages shall continue to harness the minds!

Peace is all about building the notion of love in hearts, souls and minds of people. I think it is sad to see that we don't teach enough 'history and culture of nations' to each other's children, we don't know much about each other, we should know each other well, we are bound with thousands of years of love and benevolence, this connection has a resonance of history and genes in it.

The children of 'cradle of civilisations' should be taught their past very well. This will avoid them falling in the traps set by ideological demagogues. The bond of common human attributes and evolving human consciousness is the only bond that will create global oneness. Once you go down the root of my 'avatar' is better than yours it never ends, and once you start mixing the prescription and menu of your avatar with how the state has to be run the cauldron is ready with a tinder to explode.

We are humans and we should connect at that level of one humanity , we should see earth as an astronaut 'sans boundaries' and our existence as the pinnacle of the supreme sentient configuration of 'star dust' leading to a sentient being. Nothing else evokes pride in me but the pride of being a part of sentient star dust that will always be around until the next singularity.

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from Iqbal Latif
 
anglophile

"What is lacking is a comprehensive knoweledge of our past. "

by anglophile on

And this is precisely what our pseudo-leftists lacked since the beginning of their existence till now.

Now go figure :))


Zendanian

No: as in Rushdie doesn't qualify for you: or no as in, what???

by Zendanian on

Not sure if you have read Satanic Verses, or Rushdie's latest memoire "Joseph Anton."

In any instance  the epic struggle over that novel, which is still going on, is a clear indication that we don't lack enlightened capable writers in the Muslim world.

We just have a hard time remembering who they are.

And most often lack the courage to defend them. That's all.

In Joseph Anton, Rushdie amply mentions Ibn-Rushd's  (Averroes) Rationalist approach to Islam. And a Rational, Secularized, this-worldly religion is what is needed and missing in the Muslim world.

P.S. Ibn-Rush was a Rationalist thinker influenced by Aristotel a few centuries before Descart, Liebnitz and Spinoza. It's amusing we how we utilize Western Rationalist but forget Islamic Rationalists such as Ibn-Rushd, Ibn-Khaldon,... As such we in the Muslim world don't lack the historical, cultural, philosophical resources. What is lacking  is a comprehensive knoweledge of our past.

 


Iqbal Latif

No, Lucretius-religious fear, the gods and death!

by Iqbal Latif on

Must read 'On the Nature of Things, by Lucretius': Nearly six hundred years ago, a short, genial, cannily alert man in his late thirties took a very old manuscript off a library shelf, saw with excitement what he had discovered, and ordered that it be copied. That book was the last surviving manuscript of an ancient Roman philosophical epic, 'On the Nature of Things, by Lucretius'—a beautiful poem of the most dangerous ideas: that the universe functioned without the aid of gods, that religious fear was damaging to human life, and that matter was made up of very small particles in eternal motion, colliding and swerving in new directions. 


His aim was to free the Roman world from its two great terrors – the gods and death. Lucretius argues that the gods are not actively involved in life, so need not be appeased; and that death is the end of everything human – body and soul – and therefore should not be feared. On the Nature of Things is a long celebration of the philosophy of Epicurus, a view of life which claims that all natural phenomena are to be understood in terms of the movements and combinations of material atoms. From this it flows that gods play no role in natural events or human affairs and have nothing to do with creating or sustaining the world, that the immortality of the soul is a myth fabricated by traditional religions for their own absurd and cruel purposes, and that the highest goal of life is the avoidance of unnecessary pain and the pursuit of appropriate pleasure, especially through contemplation. The poem is thus a long, impassioned plea for what we would now call classical humanism.

The copying and translation of this ancient book-the greatest discovery of the greatest book-hunter of his age-fuelled the Renaissance, inspiring artists such as Botticelli and thinkers such as Giordano Bruno; shaped the thought of Galileo and Freud, Darwin and Einstein; and had a revolutionary influence on writers such as Montaigne and Shakespeare and even Thomas Jefferson. Lucretius was born in 99 BC, and 'On the Nature of Things' is his only surviving work. Lucretius may not rank among those who have contributed important theories to science, he ranks in the forefront of those who have encouraged later thinkers to adopt a materialistic vision of the world and to base their lives on the values of classical humanism.


Zendanian

Would Salman Rushdie qualify as a significant writer, fighting

by Zendanian on

Against intolerance in the Islamic world, ( ands as the president of PEN Association USA, George Bush and War,...).

Besdies Rushdie himself, there were tens and hundreds and thousands of writers and readers in the Muslim world that publicly and privately supported him.


Iqbal Latif

Who Speaks For Islam?

by Iqbal Latif on

Iqbal Latif - 2/5/2009 The irreducible folly of terrorism has shown itself in the latest news streaming in from the troubled corner of the world; North Western Frontier Province. In Dera Ismail Khan there was a hand grenade lobbed at a local mosque, resulting in the injury of 6 worshippers. Islam is being held hostage by its own lunatics who want to avenge their losing battle ground on the blood of innocents. This is the age of making new schools for girls not destroying schools by invoking writ of Allah. "We Ask Taliban To Spare Our Schools" Now the holy name of "Allah" is invoked to perpetuate all sorts of inhuman atrocities against their fellow Muslims. How come "Muslim blood" is being targeted, becoming collateral damage in the jihad against 'infidels?' The present set of suicide bombings are aimed at maiming terrorists own ideological next of kin; Muslims, killed by their own Muslim brothers in the name of Jihad! What kind of Jihad is this?

anglophile

The point that is being missed here is this:

by anglophile on

Ikhtyar itself is Jabri otherwise there would have been no equilibrium (2nd law of thermodynamics).

 


Mehrban

"But where are 'our' Newton's and Voltaire's?"

by Mehrban on

They were assassinated somewhere along the line.


Iqbal Latif

Does Khamenei wants iron clad guarantees for lifting sanctions?

by Iqbal Latif on

 

Rumours are rampant that Khamenei is saying the 'West will not lift sanctions if Iran freezes nuclear project.' Is this an opening gambit to start negotiations towards a freeze, if some form of international guarantees to remove sanctions are offered?